The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2121  
Old 07-22-2013, 11:42 PM
PrincePatrick's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 145
Gotchya! Thanks :) I suppose Prince William was never known as the Earl of Chester or Earl of Carrick... Silly me :)
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2122  
Old 07-22-2013, 11:50 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,261
Princes do not use courtesy titles. For example neither William or Richard of Gloucester were ever known as HRH Earl of Ulster, likewise Edward of Kent was never HRH Earl of St Andrews.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2123  
Old 07-23-2013, 01:51 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincePatrick View Post
I'm sure this has been discussed/covered already, but is the baby technically/granted by courtesy the title HRH The Earl of Strathearn?

As a Prince of the Realm he wouldn't use his father's second title. That is for non-royal heirs e.g. the current Duke of Kent, when heir to his father, was known as HRH Prince Edward of Kent and the Duke of Gloucester's older brother was HRH Prince William of Gloucester even though they were the heirs to their father's titles and the present Duke of Gloucester was also known as Prince Richard of Gloucester from birth and 2nd in line to the Dukedom, to heir apparent to the Dukedom only changing when he became the Duke and thus a peer of the realm. Their sons use the courtesy titles because they aren't Princes and James, Viscount Severn also uses the courtesy title because he isn't using the HRH Prince - had Edward allowed his son to use HRH Prince then young James wouldn't use Viscount Severn but would be HRH Prince James of Wessex.

This little one will be HRH Prince xxx of Cambridge for the rest of the Queen's reign when he will become HRH Prince xxxx of Cornwall and Cambridge. He will then become HRH Prince xxxx of Wales, if Charles creates William as Prince of Wales and then the little one will become a peer of the realm when William becomes King unless he is so old that he is given a title in his own right e.g. on marriage.

Let's get him a name though first as that will be interesting to see what they come up with.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2124  
Old 07-23-2013, 10:58 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 1,041
When William becomes King, the baby is automatically the Duke of Cornwall. He doesn't have to be created a peer. That is assuming that William becomes King before the baby gets married. If not,then he would get a peerage like his dad did.

After becoming King, William would then have to name his son Prince of Wales.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2125  
Old 07-23-2013, 11:55 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
When William becomes King, the baby is automatically the Duke of Cornwall. He doesn't have to be created a peer. That is assuming that William becomes King before the baby gets married. If not,then he would get a peerage like his dad did.

After becoming King, William would then have to name his son Prince of Wales.
Duke of Cornwall is a peerage.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2126  
Old 07-23-2013, 03:49 PM
Princess Robijn's Avatar
Super Moderator
Blog Editor
Picture of the Month Representative - Denmark
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,557


Correct, but he wouldn't have to be created Duke of Cornwall. It is an automatic title for the oldest son of the Monarch who is also the heir to the throne. Therefor, as soon as Prince William becomes King, the Prince will be the (new) Duke of Cornwall.
Reply With Quote
  #2127  
Old 07-23-2013, 03:52 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Robijn View Post


Correct, but he wouldn't have to be created Duke of Cornwall. It is an automatic title for the oldest son of the Monarch who is also the heir to the throne. Therefor, as soon as Prince William becomes King, the Prince will be the (new) Duke of Cornwall.
True. I just wanted to point it out that Duke of Cornwall is a peerage. I probably could have done it better - Baby Watch has screwed with my sleep schedule.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2128  
Old 07-28-2013, 05:42 PM
Archduchess Zelia's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,975
This might be an immensely stupid question, but does the title "Prince and Great Steward of Scotland" that Prince Charles hold as heir apparent, have a female counterpart? You know, if little Prince George had been a girl, would she one day have become Princess and Great Stewardess of Scotland or is that title reserved for the wife of a male heir apparent only?
__________________
"In spite of the many initiatives our society offers to help and support, recovery can be such a monumental task that some give up.
They withdraw into themselves. Not least during Christmas and New Year is it hard to feel left out. Tonight my thoughts are with them."

— Queen Margrethe II of Denmark directly addressing people suffering from depression and loneliness in her 2011 New Years address.

Reply With Quote
  #2129  
Old 07-29-2013, 10:46 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
The Scottish titles of the heir are for the eldest son and heir to The Sovereign, just like the English titles. There is no provision for a female heir holding those titles in her own right. The wife of the heir is styled "The Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Carrick, Baroness Renfrew and Princess of Scotland".

The Sovereign could create a female heir "Princess of Wales and Countess of Chester" in her own right as those titles are granted at-will.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2130  
Old 08-05-2013, 12:40 AM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,654
Palace inquest after Prince William names Kate as his Princess-
Palace inquest after Prince William names Kate as his Princess | Royal | News | Daily Express
__________________
"If you are always trying to be normal you will never know how amazing you can be."

Dr. Maya Angelou
Reply With Quote
  #2131  
Old 08-05-2013, 01:11 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,443
It seems that different 'spokemen' for BP said different things in 2011 e.g. the Express had an expert say:

“The Duchess of Cambridge would have been Her Royal Highness Princess William if she had not been given her new title, but it is not correct to say she is a Princess now.”

while the Guardian had the following statement:

Explaining the slightly confusing picture, a palace spokesman said: "She is not a princess in her own right. That title has not been conferred on her. Her title is that of duchess. So she is not Princess Catherine. And to call her Princess William of Wales is misleading."


Hence we have one spokesman saying 'it is not correct' and another saying 'to call her Princess William... is misleading'. Two different things:

1. - not a princess at all - so a morganatic marriage

2. she is a princess but has a higher title and so it would be misleading to use her lower title.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2132  
Old 08-05-2013, 01:33 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,119
Is William still "of Wales"? I always thought that the "of wherever" was more of a courtesy title in relation to one's father's titles and that when one got his/her own titles they ceased to be "of whatever Dad is."
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2133  
Old 08-05-2013, 01:44 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 665
Simple soulution let all wives of Princes be called Princess and keep their own name for example, Princess Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. It would so much easier.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2134  
Old 08-05-2013, 02:00 AM
Jacknch's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Grundisburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Is William still "of Wales"? I always thought that the "of wherever" was more of a courtesy title in relation to one's father's titles and that when one got his/her own titles they ceased to be "of whatever Dad is."
Except William is still known as William Wales in the forces - how many names and titles can one have?!

I am shocked the palace need to double check on whether Catherine is a princess or not! If she is a Princess of the United Kingdom, then...erm...she is a princess, unless the term "princess" is no longer a title and is now simply a job description!
__________________
J
Reply With Quote
  #2135  
Old 08-05-2013, 02:05 AM
wbenson's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacknch View Post
I am shocked the palace need to double check on whether Catherine is a princess or not!
They had to in 1923 as well. Lord Stamfordham (the King's private secretary) didn't think that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon would become a princess on marriage.

http://www.heraldica.org/topics/brit..._144_22945.htm

" Though late in the day to do so, I write to ask whether it is correct to assume that by the fact of Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon marrying the Duke of York she becomes legally ipso facto "Her Royal Highness the Duchess of York" - also, that although her husband is a Prince she is not a Princess and could not become so except were the King to create her a Princess under an Order in Council ?"

The response was:

"In reply to your letter of yesterday as to the style, title and,signature of Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon after her marriage, I am desired by the Home Secretary to say that in his view there is no question that, under the settled general rule of a wife taking the status of her husband, Lady Elisabeth will, on her marriage, automatically become "Her Royal Highness", and will acquire the status of a Princess. She will not, of course, use that style any more than the Duke of York uses the style of Prince, and will become "Her Royal Highness The Duchess of York"."
__________________
TRF rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #2136  
Old 08-05-2013, 02:27 AM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 2,629
I find this most amusing. If William can get it wrong, or at least be confused by it, no wonder the rest of us do.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2137  
Old 08-05-2013, 03:53 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Is William still "of Wales"? I always thought that the "of wherever" was more of a courtesy title in relation to one's father's titles and that when one got his/her own titles they ceased to be "of whatever Dad is."

Correct. He ceased to be 'of Wales' when he was created The Duke of Cambridge.

He continued to use 'Wales' in the military for convenience, in the same way that many women continue to use their maiden names after they marriage e.g. Zara still uses Philips when competing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2138  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:47 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,443
The interesting thing is the use of words:

The Guardian says that last word was 'misleading' while The Royalist (which has everything else the same) has the last word as 'incorrect'. The Express says that the spokeperson said that 'it is not correct to say that she is a Princess now'.

The use of the words is significant.

Which BP spokeperson said anything? None is named. Exactly what did they say? Was it 'incorrect' or 'misleading' or something else? Are the reports interpreting that last word rather than reporting it verbatim? How many spokespeople were asked that day - is that why there are different words used?

If verbatim then there were at least two different versions put out or is it that The Guardian's report from 29th April, 2011 is the one that was stated at the time and that it has been changed/interpreted differently ever since? Other reports I have seen from 29th April use the word misleading - but are they just copying The Guardian or did they also get that work independently on the day?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2139  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:06 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 323
Kate Middleton listed as a Princess on Prince George's birth certificate - hellomagazine.com
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2140  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:15 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,443
Yes Marie-Christine is a Princess - Princess Michael of Kent.

The interesting one is The Duchess of Gloucester - after she married she was known officially as HRH Princess Richard of Gloucester but now, of course, is The Duchess of Gloucester.

If Kate isn't a princess then Brigitte actually stopped being a Princess when she became a Duchess.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, consort, spouse, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titles and Styles of Harry, his Future Wife and Children Aussie Princess Prince Harry and Prince William 1110 07-12-2014 10:00 PM
Questions About [non-British] Styles and Titles Lord Sosnowitz Royal Ceremony and Protocol 717 05-17-2014 05:44 PM
Diana's Styles and Titles florawindsor Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 573 11-14-2013 11:59 AM
Styles and Titles Nahla10 Ruling Family of Dubai 36 08-08-2013 12:05 PM
Abdication Beatrix and Inauguration WA: Titles, Names, Succession, Precedence Princess Robijn Abdication & Inauguration 2013 67 05-24-2013 03:14 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events diana fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri habsburg hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympics ottoman palace pom pregnancy president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary princess of asturias queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit wedding william



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]