The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2081  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:00 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal-blue View Post
The fact she would have to curtsey to her husband and even children shows she did not keep the same precedence she had when married.
Diana was not expected to curtsey to her former husband, her children or any other HRH in the family. She was still the mother of the future King and an important person in her own right.

Being granted precedence didn't mean she wasn't expected to continue to curtsey to The Queen, The Queen Mother and Prince Philip, as she did throughout her marriage.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2082  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:10 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,666
Frankly, does this matter any more?
__________________

__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2083  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:14 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 1,455
It seems that the only people that the royal bows and curtesy to is the Queen, DoE and Queen Mum when alive. Imagine how much time it would take for all the royals to greet each other at big family events.

The title situation would be so much easier if a person marrying a prince just becomes princess name. How many times do we see Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge which is the style of divorced peeress. It's just hrh duchess of Cambridge. But if it was prince William and princess Catherine it would be easier and maybe the press would stop it with Kate Middleton.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2084  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:18 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 347
Or they could keep their maiden name and not take any title - as happens when men marry a Princess.
.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2085  
Old 07-08-2013, 08:16 AM
Kotroman's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: -, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 464
Has it occurred to anyone that, if the Queen were to live long enough to see the Duke of Cambridge's hypothetical second son get divorced, that ex-wife would remain a Royal Highness?

Only the ex-wife of a son of a sovereign, of a son of a son of a sovereign and of the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales would cease being a Royal Highness according to the 1996 letters patent. The Queen probably did not bother to include ex-wives of the younger sons of the Prince of Wales's eldest son because until the last day of 2012, younger sons of the Prince of Wales's eldest son were not entitled to the princely title or the style Royal Highness.

The chances of seeing that happen are very remote. Even if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were to have a son now and then conceive another son within a month, that second son would have to be at least 16 to contract a marriage. By that time (2030), the Queen would be 105. Nevertheless, it's an interesting oversight
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2086  
Old 07-08-2013, 09:12 AM
KittyAtlanta's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,025
They profess to be a modern couple, so I see nothing wrong with calling Kate, Kate Middleton.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2087  
Old 07-08-2013, 10:04 AM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta View Post
They profess to be a modern couple, so I see nothing wrong with calling Kate, Kate Middleton.
I don't think they have ever professed to be modern - that is media spin.

However, I think that it is" modern" to call an individual what they wish to be called and not imposed one's own view onto others.

If she wants to be called Kate Middleton, then that is fine. But the Palace have said, on behalf of them both that she be called Catherine, and her title is Duchess of Cambridge. I think people should respect that.

But the real issue is targeting hits on the web - that's what drives this.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2088  
Old 07-08-2013, 10:32 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
I don't think they have ever professed to be modern - that is media spin.

But the real issue is targeting hits on the web - that's what drives this.
I agree. As anyone who has done a search on Zimbio for either of the Duchesses of Cornwall or Cambridge can attest, Kate Middleton and Camilla Parker Bowles remain very active.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2089  
Old 07-08-2013, 11:07 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kotroman View Post
Only the ex-wife of a son of a sovereign, of a son of a son of a sovereign and of the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales would cease being a Royal Highness according to the 1996 letters patent. The Queen probably did not bother to include ex-wives of the younger sons of the Prince of Wales's eldest son because until the last day of 2012, younger sons of the Prince of Wales's eldest son were not entitled to the princely title or the style Royal Highness.
Yes, but the 1996 Letters Patent make it clear that a former wife of a Prince of the UK is not entitled to the rank of HRH upon divorce. Since the style and rank is entirely within the gift of The Sovereign, Letters Patent are not necessary in any case to withhold or confer it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2090  
Old 07-08-2013, 11:26 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictoriaB View Post
Or they could keep their maiden name and not take any title - as happens when men marry a Princess.
Something we will likely see changing, with the change in gender laws. Look at Sweden, Daniel is Prince Daniel, Duke of....... Maddie's husband didn't, but because he refused to become a Swedish citizen and give up his business work, for a royal life.

In Spain it was done even earlier. Both Cristina and Elena were granted a peerage when they married, though only for life, not their husbands like would have been case in the UK. Inaki is entitled to be Duke of Mallorca, and while he did not say Borbon as a last name, their kids hold both last names. Jamie was allowed to use the courtesy title of Duke of Lugo during his marriage to Elena, but no longer since they divorced in 2010.

In Belgium we have Astrid's husband. Lorenz was already an Archduke in his own right, but he was made a Prince of Belgium in his own right, by his father in law in 1995.

It is believed that Mark was offered a title when he and Anne married, but they turned it down. Margrat's husband accepted a title when they wed. I would hope with the change in gender laws, the UK would follow Swedish and Spanish examples, and bestow the title on the royal, whether female or male, not the spouse. Like Bea and Eugenie, not their husbands.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2091  
Old 07-08-2013, 11:38 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,776
Prince/ess Cambridge

This is badly written. However, the source seems to be the mayor of Cambridge. Kate Middleton's baby 'will be the first ever Prince or Princess of Cambridge' | Mail Online
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2092  
Old 07-08-2013, 11:50 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
In Spain it was done even earlier. Both Cristina and Elena were granted a peerage when they married, though only for life, not their husbands like would have been case in the UK. Inaki is entitled to be Duke of Mallorca, and while he did not say Borbon as a last name, their kids hold both last names. Jamie was allowed to use the courtesy title of Duke of Lugo during his marriage to Elena, but no longer since they divorced in 2010.
Their children have both last names because that is the way surnames are for evrryone in Spain. Juan was Bourbon y Battenberg, Juan Carlos is Bourbon y Bourbon, his children are Bourbon y Grecia, etc. If Mr Sanchez marries Senorita Salcido their children will be Sanchez y Salcido.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2093  
Old 07-08-2013, 12:16 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS View Post
Prince/ess Cambridge

This is badly written. However, the source seems to be the mayor of Cambridge. Kate Middleton's baby 'will be the first ever Prince or Princess of Cambridge' | Mail Online
This is horribly written, but I will say that at least the DM (if not the mayor of Cambridge) realized at some point that Baby Cambridge is not the first Prince(ss) of Cambridge. That honour went to the children of Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2094  
Old 07-08-2013, 12:54 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro and Petrópolis, Brazil
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
This is horribly written, but I will say that at least the DM (if not the mayor of Cambridge) realized at some point that Baby Cambridge is not the first Prince(ss) of Cambridge. That honour went to the children of Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge.
1. Prince George of Cambridge, later the Duke of Cambridge (1819-1904).

2. Princess Augusta of Cambridge, later the Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (1822-1916).

3. Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge, later the Duchess of Teck (1833-1897).

Interestingly, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge is a descendant of Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge:

Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge (1774-1850) - Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge (1833-1897) - Princess Mary of Teck (1867-1953) - King George VI of the United Kingdom (1895-1952) - Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom (b. 1926) - Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (b. 1948) - Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (b. 1982).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2095  
Old 07-08-2013, 02:16 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
...Both Cristina and Elena were granted a peerage when they married, though only for life, not their husbands like would have been case in the UK. Inaki is entitled to be Duke of Mallorca...Jamie was allowed to use the courtesy title of Duke of Lugo during his marriage to Elena...
The husbands of the Spanish Infantas still did not become princes. Neither did any of the following men who married princesses:-

Mark Phillips ; Timothy Lawrence ; Sir Angus Ogilvy ; Ari Behn ; Philippe Junot ; Stefano Casiraghi ; Daniel Ducruet ; none of the husbands of Monaco's Princesse Antoinette , none of the husbands of the sisters of the kings of Sweden or Spain etc etc

IMO only the husbands of future queens became princes. ( Claus, Henrik, Daniel etc)

The "modern" women want to keep their own names but are more than willing to accept their husbands titles and poisitions
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2096  
Old 07-08-2013, 02:27 PM
vkrish's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
Hey regarding this new title..Why is this so much sensationalised..I just saw a new blog on the home page about the title..
The baby will automatically be "HRH Prince X of Cambridge" or "HRH Princess Y of Cambridge", right?
So whats new about it?
Will the baby exclusively be "Prince X, Prince of Cambridge"? Just like Prince Charles, Prince of Wales? Will he/she be referred to as "HRH The Prince(ss) of Cambridge", rather than the conventional "HRH Prince(ss) X of Cambridge"?
I dont understand any special provision exists like that.. And I dont see any necessity for that..
__________________
The only word I hate in the Royal Dictionary - ABDICATION
Reply With Quote
  #2097  
Old 07-08-2013, 02:38 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,666
This story started, IMO, with the MAyor of Cambridge making some statement about the baby being the first Prince/Princess of Cambridge; this was picked up by the DM and then reprinted in the Telegraph. No one seems to have checked the facts.

IT is an incorrect report and should be ignored and the information that we have all had for a long time is that the baby will be HRH Prince/Princess < Baby Name> of Cambridge.

Twitter has been full of known commentators criticising both papers for not checking facts.

http://www.royalcentral.co.uk/royalb...ys-title-11116

fairly reliable blog.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2098  
Old 07-08-2013, 04:21 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Springfield, United States
Posts: 84
I apologize for being dense, but I still don't understand why the great grand child of a monarch will be a prince or princess, but the grandchildren - Louise and James - are not. Is it because Edward is not a Duke? Do only Duke's children get to be princes or princesses? I know this has been discussed, it's just my stupidity at work here.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2099  
Old 07-08-2013, 04:26 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,260
Edward asked that his children not be known as Prince or Princess but styled as the children of an earl. It is debated as to whether they do or do not actually hold such titles and simply do not use them.
Williams children will all be HRH Prince/Princess X of Cambridge because HM issued new Letters Patent making it so. Under the 1917 Letters Patent of George V only Williams eldest son would have been HRH and Prince X of Cambridge while his other children would have been Lord or Lady X Mountbatten Windsor.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2100  
Old 07-08-2013, 04:31 PM
Molly2101's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,692
I think legally Louise and James are a Princess and a Prince, but Edward and Sophie just chose for them to not be styled as this as they want to lead private lives. We rarely see their children, and their choice is for them to be hidden from the public and lead private lives. They will not be that well known as they grow up. They will especially be less well known than Peter or Zara, who aren't that famous. I think Edward and Sophie did well with this choice to be honest as Louise and James can lead normal lives. They aren't know as Lord and Lady at school - simply Louise and James Mountbatten-Windsor. They are essentially like any other normal child, though I imagine most people who attend the school know who their grandmother is! Well, the children's parents will of course know.
__________________

__________________
"I am yours, you are mine, of that be sure. You are locked in my heart, the little key is lost and now you must stay there forever."
Written by Princess Alix of Hesse and by Rhine in the diary of her fiance, Tsarevich Nicholas.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, consort, spouse, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titles and Styles of Harry, his Future Wife and Children Aussie Princess Prince Harry and Prince William 1111 Today 11:11 PM
Questions About [non-British] Styles and Titles Lord Sosnowitz Royal Ceremony and Protocol 729 10-09-2014 04:24 PM
Diana's Styles and Titles florawindsor Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 573 11-14-2013 11:59 AM
Styles and Titles Nahla10 Ruling Family of Dubai 36 08-08-2013 12:05 PM
Abdication Beatrix and Inauguration WA: Titles, Names, Succession, Precedence Princess Robijn Major Royal Events 67 05-24-2013 03:14 PM




Popular Tags
belgium brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion genealogy germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king constantine ii king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympic games ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince daniel prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess ariane princess astrid princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen anne-marie queen fabiola queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]