The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 01-04-2011, 11:01 PM
Lady Claire's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasumi
British politicians are launching a new bid this month to rewrite the rules of succession, a move aimed at giving Catholics and female members of the Royal Family equal status with men and Protestants under the 310-year-old legislation governing the order of those in line to the throne. - Vancouver Sun
http://www.canada.com/news/successio...#ixzz1A32EqVUR
I hope they succeed. It's not like the monarch has much power anyways and Queen Elizabeth has done a magnificent job, IMO.
__________________

__________________
"I can resist everything except temptation." - Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:27 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasumi View Post
British politicians are launching a new bid this month to rewrite the rules of succession, a move aimed at giving Catholics and female members of the Royal Family equal status with men and Protestants under the 310-year-old legislation governing the order of those in line to the throne. - Vancouver Sun
That's strange, that they have a story about it over there, but no one has heard anything about it in our own country?
__________________

__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 01-07-2011, 02:36 PM
NotAPretender's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WPB FL/Muttontown NY, United States
Posts: 853
I think this is an excellent initiative. I'm glad that it is being addressed now, when the succession is quite safe - rather than at some potential/mythical future point in which the succession might be in "crisis."
__________________
"Me, your Highness? On the whole, I wish I'd stayed in Tunbridge Wells"
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 01-07-2011, 05:14 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotAPretender View Post
I think this is an excellent initiative. I'm glad that it is being addressed now, when the succession is quite safe - rather than at some potential/mythical future point in which the succession might be in "crisis."

This issue has been raised regularly with the comment that the government is going to do something and nothing is ever done.

I don't think there is a need to change anything at the moment so why do so - but they will when the time comes.

If Kate's first child is a boy then they can put it off for another generation.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 01-07-2011, 05:30 PM
Leslie2006's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 445
I think they should change it. Britain needs to come out of the dark ages and into the 21st Century already. Enough of this sexist crap.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 01-07-2011, 05:41 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie2006 View Post
I think they should change it. Britain needs to come out of the dark ages and into the 21st Century already. Enough of this sexist crap.

It isn't as simple as changing the line of succession as there are so many other ways that women are treated differently to men within the royal structure e.g. the wife of a prince becomes a princess but the husband of a princess doesn't become a prince, the children of princes becomes HRH but not the children of princesses.

The government could also find itself with a debate that moves beyond the simple change in line of succession and the RF and government tend not to want to go that way.

The government will deal with the situation when it needs to - that is when a son is born who is younger than his sister but until then why open a can of worms?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 01-07-2011, 05:48 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie2006 View Post
Enough of this sexist crap.
It has nothing to do with sexism, it's tradition.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 01-07-2011, 07:21 PM
HM Queen Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rendsburg, Germany
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
It has nothing to do with sexism, it's tradition.
And those kinds of traditions go way beyond the British system.. I mean, even in America's not-so-distant past it was the tradition to leave the plantation to the eldest son. And those principles continue even today in the South, to some extent.

Personally, I hope the BRF leaves things as they are.

Part of the mystique of the royal family is their dynasty.. their living history.. and preserving those traditions is more important, IMO, than "modernizing" the succession.

Just my two cents.
__________________
Ú i vethed...nâ i onnad. Minlû pedich nin i aur hen telitha. - Arwen & Aragorn, The Lord of the Rings
(English translation: "This is not the end... it is the beginning. You told me once, this day would come.")
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 01-07-2011, 08:00 PM
Maura724's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis, United States
Posts: 772
I agree. Incidentally, since you mentioned the eldest son tradition, I have always wondered why there is/has been a push in so many countries against women having less equal succession rights and no push against younger children having less equal succession rights. Perhaps one could argue that it is not fair in Norway for Martha Louise to be passed over in favor of Haakon simply because he's male, but why doesn't anyone ever argue that it is not fair in Denmark for Joachim to be passed over in favor of Fred simply because Fred's 13 months older?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 01-07-2011, 08:27 PM
Leslie2006's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maura724 View Post
but why doesn't anyone ever argue that it is not fair in Denmark for Joachim to be passed over in favor of Fred simply because Fred's 13 months older?
Good point, Maura, and I understand what everyone is saying about it being tradition, but this tradition has been broken several times, as someone previously mentioned Norway and Sweden (?), why not do it in Britain as well? It would be a good new start for them, not to mention, does the being Catholic thing even really apply these days? I don't understand why that still stands, especially nowadays.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 01-07-2011, 09:44 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie2006 View Post
Good point, Maura, and I understand what everyone is saying about it being tradition, but this tradition has been broken several times, as someone previously mentioned Norway and Sweden (?), why not do it in Britain as well? It would be a good new start for them, not to mention, does the being Catholic thing even really apply these days? I don't understand why that still stands, especially nowadays.

The reason for the Catholic ban is the same - it is the existing law and would open a can of worms to repeal it as well as allowing the parliament the chance to debate issues around the royal family best left alone.

Again - until the need arises it won't happen. Simple - let sleeping dogs lie.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 01-08-2011, 12:02 AM
HM Queen Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rendsburg, Germany
Posts: 303
As far as the Catholic ban goes.. though it stretches back to the Stuarts, you also have the added complication that the monarch is Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

Given this fact, it simply cannot be that the monarch, the consort or anyone in line to the succession is Catholic. So yes, it applies even today. And I doubt any religion other than Anglican would really be acceptable.. certainly not for the sovereign, who holds the title of Supreme Governor.

Traditions being broken in Norway and Sweden are one thing.. the UK is another matter entirely. The Queen is the head of state for all the countries in the Commonwealth. To change the rules of succession, it would have to be approved in every country that belonged to the Commonwealth.. not just England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

To get all those countries to agree would be a task in itself, and one I'm sure no one wants to tackle unless or until its absolutely necessary.
__________________
Ú i vethed...nâ i onnad. Minlû pedich nin i aur hen telitha. - Arwen & Aragorn, The Lord of the Rings
(English translation: "This is not the end... it is the beginning. You told me once, this day would come.")
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 01-08-2011, 01:50 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,545
As the vast majority of countries in the Commonwealth have their own Heads of State, and are republics, they wouldn't care less about what was happening to the monarch in Britain - it wouldn't affect them.

As for most of the rest - their constitutions have clauses that make it clear that the monarch of the UK is their monarch. There would be no need for them to even be consulted (that doesn't mean that they wouldn't be consulted but there is no real need). They couldn't do anything about it anyway. It certainly woudn't require legislation in all of them based on the precedent set in 1936 when only the British government passed the Abdication Act and none of the other governments were required to do so.

This is another argument for the republicans in these countries to use of course - the fact that legislation in Britain can change who it the expected Head of State of another country and they can't do anything about it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 01-11-2011, 05:51 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,533
So...what happens then if the monarch married a Jew, or a Hindu? The thought process is the same. We are over-complicating it. It could simply state the Monarch must remain in the Church of England, regardless of who they marry. Also, why not have equal rights succession? Again, just do like the other countries and state it starts at such and such time, with such and such person in line to the throne, like William and Catherine's children. My goodness, I am sure the government can do this and not topple over......
__________________
Lady M
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 01-11-2011, 06:17 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Posts: 25
This is quite simple Really.

Parliament passes a law that only Prince Charles and his descendents are in the line of succession. This would be similar to the law passed in the 1700s to allow only The electress Sophia and her descendents to inherit the throne.

Next they scrap the rule that males preceed females.

That wouldnt effect anyone that was then in line but would allow future female eldest children to come before any brothers.

Changing the law on marriage to catholics or being a catholic might be a little more difficult but I dont see it as insurmountable.

I personally dont see why they couldnt then go the whole hog and also allow some future illigitimate heirs to inherit. ie where patternity is not in doubt.

Kate and wills have decided to marry and their children will be legitimate but in an age where so many do not marry I could see a time when the someone high in the line of succession might make a choice not to marry but still have children.

If we are not going to be fair and not have any discrimination, Why should they be discriminated against?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 01-11-2011, 06:35 PM
rob2008's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 124
It is preferable to retain male primogeniture because a woman takes her title and status from her husband and a man cannot take his status or title from his wife.

Putting daughters at the end of the inheritance queue is a suitable compromise because it protects the small number of cases where there are no male heirs in the direct line of succession to a title.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 01-11-2011, 06:57 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,545
The whole system is discriminatory as the only person who can be Head of State is decided by an act of chance - based on who a person's parents are.
Why should it be the eldest child/son etc who inherits? Doesn't that discriminate against the younger children?
The problem with allowing illegitimate inheritance, even if acknowledged, is what happens if child A is acknowledged but child B, who is older isn't but is able to prove via DNA that they are the child of the monarch.
Personally I don't see any reason to change succession laws.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 01-12-2011, 11:44 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, United States
Posts: 2,324
its fine as is
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 01-12-2011, 11:52 PM
ThePrincessRoyal's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 122
I honestly don't see anything wrong with the current inheritance laws.... (and because according to some here I am a "wannabe") was the male favoured primogeniture introduced with common law in the UK?
__________________
There is no sense in running to something if you are running away from something else
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 01-13-2011, 12:03 AM
Leslie2006's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 445
The only problem I have with the current laws is that it favors the men - which is based of an age-old assumption dating back several hundred years that women were only around to make babies to continue the family line; nothing more. So the way the line of succession is set up now, it reflects this sexist view. Equal primogeniture is better.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Act of Settlement 1701 and the Line of Succession Elise,LadyofLancaster British Royals 926 04-15-2014 11:41 PM
Succession Issues ladybelline Imperial Family of Japan 918 11-02-2013 12:14 PM
Rules of Succession CrownPrinceLorenzo Royalty Past, Present, and Future 95 10-25-2012 01:55 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events duchess of cambridge dutch royal history fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg nobility olympics ottoman poland pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess mabel princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]