The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #921  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:28 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosana View Post
I had to look up "hamper" because I was not sure, and I can´t believe it. Almost seems like a joke.
I'm not a native speaker either, but I understand "hamper" to be a basket filled with gifts? What is the joke?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #922  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:47 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkittybaby View Post
"New laws to ensure William and Kate’s first child accedes to the throne even if it is a girl will be rushed out within weeks and fast-tracked through Parliament in two days, the Standard reveals today." Fast-track vote for Duchess of Cambridge's baby law - UK - News - London Evening Standard
Somehow I doubt it's going to be rushed through 13 parliaments in two days.
__________________

__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #923  
Old 01-07-2013, 01:29 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkittybaby View Post
"New laws to ensure William and Kate’s first child accedes to the throne even if it is a girl will be rushed out within weeks and fast-tracked through Parliament in two days, the Standard reveals today."
Fast-track vote for Duchess of Cambridge's baby law - UK - News - London Evening Standard
It's not the "Duchess" of Cambridge's baby that needs a new law, well, it does, but shouldn't it say: "William's" baby when it comes to a potetial inheritance of the throne? For whoever William's duchess would be, as long as she is married to him and it's his child said child needs the new law.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #924  
Old 01-07-2013, 01:39 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn View Post

It's not the "Duchess" of Cambridge's baby that needs a new law, well, it does, but shouldn't it say: "William's" baby when it comes to a potetial inheritance of the throne? For whoever William's duchess would be, as long as she is married to him and it's his child said child needs the new law.
Don't you know this is Catherine and the worlds baby? William's just the dad and future King.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #925  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:48 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 785
Order or birth determines priority.
Exactly as it should be. If a father has 6 sons the eldest son rightly so, should inherit the title estates. If he has only daughters the title should pass to his 2nd brother. Makes perfect sense to me.

Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice the Estate was entailed away from the daughters because there were no sons. That is how it is done. That is how it should be left.

I love the 1700's it was my favourite time period. Before anyone says go back there. I only wish I could. Time machine anyone?
I am perfectly content with the Male Hereditary Rules. Have no problem with it whatsoever. If I am alone here, then so be it. Please feel free to move this to the correct thread? I won't change my mind and would not expect you to change yours.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #926  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:50 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
For those who have accepted the statements that a woman having Hyperemesis Gravidus is more likely to have a female baby, I doubt that this is based un unassailable medical facts. If this statement goes unchallenged, some people might rush to the assumption that Catherine's baby is female.

I read on the Royal Forum thread on the Japanese monarchy that doctors tinkered with the pregnancy of Princess Kiko to achieve a male baby. I was surprised at this. I had not heard this was possible. If it IS possible, it is possible the British also tinkered with this pregnancy through InVitro. I am not at all saying this happened, it would be a very far out rumor. I am not spreading a rumor, just saying this is the only way I can conceive (ha) of there being anything but guessing possible at this stage.

I had HG and I had a boy. Others here on RF had the same outcome.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #927  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:54 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by angieuk View Post
Order or birth determines priority.
Exactly as it should be
Well by your statement, If a girl arrives first before 3 brothers, she should be Queen. That's the order of birth?
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #928  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:03 PM
Elenath's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nuth, Netherlands
Posts: 299
Funny how people say they would love to live in a certain century and how the things were done so much better back then. I always wonder if they would still feel that way after a few years in that time. We women are used to so much freedom and rights we often take it for granted. Having a job, getting married to whom ever we wanted, going wherever we want, owning property and money, the right to vote (or not), etc, etc. Women didn't have those things in the 1700...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #929  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:20 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 2,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
I read on the Royal Forum thread on the Japanese monarchy that doctors tinkered with the pregnancy of Princess Kiko to achieve a male baby. I was surprised at this. I had not heard this was possible. If it IS possible, it is possible the British also tinkered with this pregnancy through InVitro. I am not at all saying this happened, it would be a very far out rumor. I am not spreading a rumor, just saying this is the only way I can conceive (ha) of there being anything but guessing possible at this stage.
Maybe it's like sea turtles, and cooler temperatures produces males. Perhaps that's what was going on in that swimming pool in France. William was saying, "Stop sunbathing. Get in that pool and keep cool. We need a boy!" EDIT: Or maybe it was Kate saying the same thing to William, which is probably more relevant, if any of it is relevant.

Seriously though, wouldn't embryo screening be required, meaning IVF? I cannot, for one fraction of a second, imagine William and Kate consenting to that sort of invasive procedure to satisfy someone else's crazy desire for their first born to be a boy.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #930  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:33 PM
hkittybaby's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: london, United Kingdom
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
For those who have accepted the statements that a woman having Hyperemesis Gravidus is more likely to have a female baby, I doubt that this is based un unassailable medical facts. If this statement goes unchallenged, some people might rush to the assumption that Catherine's baby is female.

I read on the Royal Forum thread on the Japanese monarchy that doctors tinkered with the pregnancy of Princess Kiko to achieve a male baby. I was surprised at this. I had not heard this was possible. If it IS possible, it is possible the British also tinkered with this pregnancy through InVitro. I am not at all saying this happened, it would be a very far out rumor. I am not spreading a rumor, just saying this is the only way I can conceive (ha) of there being anything but guessing possible at this stage.

I had HG and I had a boy. Others here on RF had the same outcome.
I had HG and had girls
__________________
“Yes, well, I really hope I can make a difference, even in the smallest way. I am looking forward to helping as much as I can.”
Catherine Middleton
Reply With Quote
  #931  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:35 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
Don't you know this is Catherine and the worlds baby? William's just the dad and future King.
No, I didn't want to know, but you are soooo right. Okay, I rest my case.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #932  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:14 PM
Nice Nofret's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 395
mhh, I doubt very much angieUK would relish to be the scullery-maid in the 1700th - *lol*
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #933  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:15 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,261
I think when people imagine they would like to live in another age they imagine they would be wealthy and priviledged not working as a scullery maid or in the fields or cleaning out stables or lucky enough to make it into their 30s. The reality of such a life would be a very rude awakening.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #934  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:27 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 3,886
For starters, I do have to commend each and every one of our fellow posters who are active on here yet English is their second language or perhaps even third. I cannot imagine faring very well should I be in the same situation and on a forum where the primary language is French, Spanish or otherwise.

English words so often have multiple meanings. A hamper could be a laundry hamper in the bathroom, a picnic hamper or a gift hamper. if it was wet and muddy, it would hamper my trek uphill. With the donation by the Duchess of Cambridge, its easy for most of us to figure out its a large container filled with things that one would need for a baby. I really do hope the auction goes very well and if I'm not mistaken, isn't there a place on EACH's website for it?

I so often too have thought I'd like to time travel back to the Jane Austen days and also the medieval period but after watching some programs where people actually did go and live that life as it would have really been, I don't think I would like it much. Things like running hot and cold water, flush toilets and food that's kept nicely in a refrigerator would be unheard of for starters.
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
Reply With Quote
  #935  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:35 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 2,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by angieuk View Post
Prince Charles: Shake-up to let a daughter succeed to the throne 'has not been thought through' | Mail Online

As far as I am concerned the Sons' should always be given precedence over older sisters. Don't care if it is old fashioned that is how it should be left.

Sweden can keep its Queen's. Kings and Queens in a pack of card - King wins every time. That is how it should be.

A woman sovereign will never have the status of a male sovereign. On paper maybe, but that's it. My views won't change on this. I think they should leave well alone. If there are no male children born then fair enough, but if a male child comes along later, he should inherit the throne above his older sister, no question about it!
All European royal families will have a multitude of challenges in the years ahead as the reigning Kings and Queens pass on and the new generations ascend the thrones. To become more relevant and in line with the social and political landscape will be the biggest issue for them to deal with. To not modernize the succession and have the first-born inherit the throne would make the monarchy even more irrelevant and out of touch with reality. At least the succession issue can be changed and leave one less issue that will put the whole monarchy into question.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #936  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:47 PM
EIIR's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Somewhere, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,624
The idea that a Queen regnant is always inferior to a King is just absurd. QEII towers over every monarch in Europe, if not the world, in my opinion, despite being female and rather diminutive in physical stature. I know she's got longevity on her side, but there's probably only one monarch in the world who could get all the other monarchs in one room - Queen Elizabeth II.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #937  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:57 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Campbelltown, Australia
Posts: 97
I don't know about HG, but I had far worse morning sickness with my daughter than I had with my 3 sons......make if that what you will.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #938  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:34 PM
GracieGiraffe's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Giraffe Land, United States
Posts: 1,638
Statistically speaking, it is more likely to suffer morning sickness, including the extreme HG, during a pregnancy with a girl - I think due to more hormones secreted by the female fetus.

However, while it's "more likely" it's not such a significant difference that it really tips the balance. It's just like saying that more boys are born than girls (which there are), but it's something like for every 100 girls, 101 boys are born.

I'm guessing that because Kate suffered HG, it's perhaps a few percentage points more likely that she is carrying a girl. But I certainly would not start painting nurseries pink based on that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #939  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:48 PM
GracieGiraffe's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Giraffe Land, United States
Posts: 1,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine View Post
I think when people imagine they would like to live in another age they imagine they would be wealthy and priveledged not working as a scullery made or in the fields or cleaning out stables or lucky enough to make it into their 30s. The reality of such a life would be a very rude awakening.
The reality of the life of the wealthy and privileged would be a rude awakening as well.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #940  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:54 PM
hkittybaby's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: london, United Kingdom
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by EIIR View Post
The idea that a Queen regnant is always inferior to a King is just absurd. QEII towers over every monarch in Europe, if not the world, in my opinion, despite being female and rather diminutive in physical stature. I know she's got longevity on her side, but there's probably only one monarch in the world who could get all the other monarchs in one room - Queen Elizabeth II.
So so true!
__________________

__________________
“Yes, well, I really hope I can make a difference, even in the smallest way. I am looking forward to helping as much as I can.”
Catherine Middleton
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Act of Settlement 1701 and the Line of Succession Elise,LadyofLancaster British Royals 926 04-15-2014 11:41 PM
Succession Issues ladybelline Imperial Family of Japan 918 11-02-2013 12:14 PM
Rules of Succession CrownPrinceLorenzo Royalty Past, Present, and Future 95 10-25-2012 01:55 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge dutch royal history engagement fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri habsburg hohenzollern infanta sofia jewellery jordan kate middleton king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg nobility olympic games ottoman picture of the month pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince felipe prince felix prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]