The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #801  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:25 PM
Artemisia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinrit View Post
The wife of a King is a Queen Consort, without exception, just as the Queen Mother was, all the way back to medieval times. Should Charles predecease Camilla, and should he have been King at that time, Camilla would probably be known as something like Dowager Queen Consort. Princess Alice was known as Princess in her own right because the Queen allowed her to keep the title rather than taking the title of Dowager Duchess, but I don't remember why.
If Charles predeceases Camilla after his accession to the Throne, she will be known as Her Majesty Queen Camilla and will be The Dowager Queen Consort.
If Charles predeceases Camilla before his accession to the Throne, she will be the Dowager Duchess of Cornwall (although she'll probably continue to be known simply as The Duchess of Cornwall, especially since there will be no new Duchess of Cornwall for decades).

Princess Alice didn't want to be known as the Dowager Duchess simply because she disliked the styling; she thus asked the Queen to be known "Princess Alice", rather like the Dowager Duchess of Kent was styled simply as Princess Marina (the difference was of course that Marina was born a Princess, whereas Alice hadn't been). The Queen granting the wish since she considered that Alice was a British Princess (by marriage) anyway.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #802  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:38 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,350
Queen Alexandra and Queen Mary continued to be known as Queen Alexandra and Queen Mary in the reigns of their sons and granddaughter in the latters case.

Camilla would be HM The Queen during Charles' reign and then Queen Camilla.

The main reason why The Queen Mum used that title was that she would have been Queen Elizabeth as well as her daughter.

Queen Adelaide remained as Queen Adelaide into Queen Victoria's reign.

No need for Camilla to be called 'dowager'.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #803  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:40 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia View Post
If Charles predeceases Camilla after his accession to the Throne, she will be known as Her Majesty Queen Camilla and will be The Dowager Queen Consort.
If Charles predeceases Camilla before his accession to the Throne, she will be the Dowager Duchess of Cornwall (although she'll probably continue to be known simply as The Duchess of Cornwall, especially since there will be no new Duchess of Cornwall for decades).

We don't know how long it will be before there is another Duke of Cornwall. It Kate's baby is a boy he will instantly be Duke of Cornwall the moment his father becomes King.

Now if Charles were to predecease his mother there would be a new Duke of Cornwall not too long afterwards - certainly not decades (I don't see The Queen living another 20+ years).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #804  
Old 01-01-2013, 05:05 PM
Artemisia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
We don't know how long it will be before there is another Duke of Cornwall. It Kate's baby is a boy he will instantly be Duke of Cornwall the moment his father becomes King.

Now if Charles were to predecease his mother there would be a new Duke of Cornwall not too long afterwards - certainly not decades (I don't see The Queen living another 20+ years).
Firstly, what with Equal Primogeniture laws (granted, they still need to be accepted), William's eldest son will not automatically become The Duke of Cornwall upon his father's accession to the Throne. If he has an elder siste, the title will either be vacant, or the rules of inheriting the title will be changed from "the heir apparent who is also the eldest son of the Sovereign" to "the heir(ess) apparent who is also the eldest child of the Sovereign".

And secondly, I wasn't talking about the next Duke of Cornwall - I mentioned the next Duchess of Cornwall. If Charles predeceases the Queen, then regardless of when William's son becomes The Duke of Cornwall (if he does), it will be at least a couple of decades until there is a new Duchess, unless someone reinstates the medieval practice among monarchies of child marriages. And if Charles doesn't predecease the Queen, than the issue of "uniqueness" of Camilla's title (the comment I was responding to) won't even arise since Camilla will be the Dowager Queen Consort and will be known as Her Majesty Queen Camilla, while William's wife will be the new Duchess of Cornwall.
Reply With Quote
  #805  
Old 01-01-2013, 06:53 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 2,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia View Post
The only way Camilla will legally be The Princess Consort is if the Parliaments of all countries of the Realm pass legislations specifically depriving Camilla of a title that would otherwise be rightfully and automatically hers the moment Charles ascends to the Throne - and chances of that happening are virtually non-existent.
I can understand why the consent of the realms is required to change the laws regarding the succession, but I don't understand why our consent would be required to legislation regarding the spouse of the monarch.

The (UK) Statute of Westminster, 1931, provides that:

"No Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that that Dominion has requested, and consented to, the enactment thereof."

The (Australian) Statute of Westminster Adoption Act, 1942, provides that Statute provided that laws made by the UK Parliament would only have effect on a Dominion at the request of the government of that Dominion.

The Australian Constitution provides a role for the Queen of the UK - at the relevant time Queen Victoria - and her heirs and successors. The UK sovereign from time to time is our monarch, so legislation changing the laws regarding the succession by making it by equal primogeniture does have effect on us. However there is no role for any member of the UK Royal Family other than the sovereign, so legislation relating to the sovereign's spouse is irrelevant to us and has no effect on us so there is no reason for us to have to consent.

Am I missing something?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #806  
Old 01-01-2013, 08:59 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Campbelltown, Australia
Posts: 97
Further to Roslyn's post above, is this affected and how, by the "Royal Styles and Titles Act ", Commonwealth of Australia 1973?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #807  
Old 01-01-2013, 09:38 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
Thanks everyone for clarifying this incredibly complex title issue. I'm relieved that Queen Camilla would not have to be Dowager or Queen Mother.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #808  
Old 01-01-2013, 09:52 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 2,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trillian View Post
Further to Roslyn's post above, is this affected and how, by the "Royal Styles and Titles Act ", Commonwealth of Australia 1973?
I'm not sure what you have in mind here. This is that Act: Royal Style and Titles Act 1973
It's a piece of Australian Federal Government legislation, relating to how HM is titled and styled in relation to Australia and its territories.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #809  
Old 01-01-2013, 11:07 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 3,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
Phillip was Prince since his marriage. Camilla would be following precedent to become Princess rather than queen. This is a nicer title than Queen Consort, which sounds like she is nothing except for Charles consorting with her. Of course she would not be following precedent of the Queen Mother Elizabeth. Camilla could then remain a Princess if Charles predeceases her. She would have a nice title belonging to her alone, like Princess Alice of Gloucester, who chose this title with the queen's permission after her son married and there was another Duchess of Gloucester in her family. Alice didn't like the title Dowager Duchess, and I don't blame her. It's awkward for Camilla if she becomes a widow, as she can't be called Queen Mother; she is not William's mother. As Princess she can go on indefinitely even with a new Queen. That's all speculation, of course, as to who will pass on first, Charles or Camilla.
I thought Philip became the Duke of Edinburgh on his marriage. It wasn't till 1957 that his wife, the Queen, made him a Prince of the UK.

OK.. question. When Charles becomes King, he will also become the Duke of Lancaster correct? Couldn't Camilla then be styled as The Duchess of Lancaster if she chose?
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
Reply With Quote
  #810  
Old 01-02-2013, 04:14 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post

I thought Philip became the Duke of Edinburgh on his marriage. It wasn't till 1957 that his wife, the Queen, made him a Prince of the UK.

OK.. question. When Charles becomes King, he will also become the Duke of Lancaster correct? Couldn't Camilla then be styled as The Duchess of Lancaster if she chose?
You're right with the DOE thing, but Camilla cannot be the Duchess of Lancaster. Philip isn't the Duke of Lancaster, his wife is.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #811  
Old 01-02-2013, 04:40 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 3,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
You're right with the DOE thing, but Camilla cannot be the Duchess of Lancaster. Philip isn't the Duke of Lancaster, his wife is.
Thanks. Just wondered if it'd be a go. Even though his wife was queen, he couldn't be a king but I thought that if Charles held the Duke of Lancaster title, it might be possible for Camilla to use the feminine version of it.
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
Reply With Quote
  #812  
Old 01-02-2013, 04:51 AM
wbenson's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,231
The title of "Duke of Lancaster" is sort of a fiction anyways. There's a Duchy of Lancaster held by the monarch, but there isn't really a duke anymore since the sovereign can't also be a peer. The Queen has approved its use in toasts, though, so it's not entirely dead.
__________________
TRF rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #813  
Old 01-02-2013, 05:54 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,350
The Queen is referred to as The Duke of Lancaster in the CC when she attends meeting of the Duchy, just as Charles is referred to as The Duke of Cornwall when he attends meetings of the Duchy of Cornwall.

Queen Victoria would use Duchess of Lancaster when she travelled 'incognito' as well.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #814  
Old 01-02-2013, 06:38 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
She is "duchess of Normandy" as well, as there is a rest of Normandy under her reign - the Channel Islands. They came under the English rule when their duke became king of England in 1066 and have stayed so, but AFAIK they are still considered part of the old "Normandy", thus they are covered by the rule that the souverain can't be a peer, as here she is the souverain of another realm. But I'm not sure how they dealt with that when they formed the Uk in the 1700s. They included Wales in England, what happened to Normandy's rest?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #815  
Old 01-02-2013, 07:25 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 50
I think the idea of replacing the title of "Queen" with "Princess Consort" is just a suggestion by a maverick MP who isn't keen on royalty full stop: I can't see any way it'll become law.

As far as Camilla's concerned, the whole "Princess Consort" thing, like being known as "the Duchess of Cornwall" when legally she's the Princess of Wales, is a sop to people who're obsessive about Diana. What happened to Diana was tragic, but hopefully by the time Charles becomes king people will have moved on from it and Camilla will have the title of queen.


It's not even just a royal issue. If Lady Diana Spencer had married Mr Bloggs, he would still have been plain Mr Bloggs. However, when Lord X marries, his wife becomes Lady X. If Sir John Smith gets married, his wife becomes Lady Smith. If Dame Jane Smith gets married, her husband remains plain Mr Whatever. & so on. No-one seems to be suggesting messing with all that: this MP probably just wants to get his name in the press!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #816  
Old 01-02-2013, 07:32 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbenson View Post
The title of "Duke of Lancaster" is sort of a fiction anyways. There's a Duchy of Lancaster held by the monarch, but there isn't really a duke anymore since the sovereign can't also be a peer. The Queen has approved its use in toasts, though, so it's not entirely dead.

I live in Manchester, Lancashire, and toasts in Lancashire are always to "The Queen, Duke of Lancaster" ... but in the rest of the country they just say "The Queen" - so it's our bit of local pride ! I'd never thought of Camilla being referred to as the Duchess of Lancaster, but I rather like that ... although as far as I'm concerned the king's wife is the queen, end of.

In historical records for Lancashire, Queen Victoria is sometimes referred to as "Queen Victoria, Duchess of Lancaster," but that's incorrect - Queens Regnant are Dukes of Lancaster.

The Queen's also the Duke of Normandy, as someone else said, and Lord of Mann (i.e. the Isle of Man).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #817  
Old 01-02-2013, 07:41 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westmeath, Ireland
Posts: 8,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
Thanks everyone for clarifying this incredibly complex title issue. I'm relieved that Queen Camilla would not have to be Dowager or Queen Mother.
Camilla would never be the Queen Mother as she has no children with the Prince of Wales.

Queen mother - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
30th of July 1936-Birth of HRH The Infanta Pilar of Spain, Duchess of Badajoz, Dowager Viscountess de la Torre
Reply With Quote
  #818  
Old 01-02-2013, 08:00 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by An Ard Ri View Post
Camilla would never be the Queen Mother as she has no children with the Prince of Wales.

Queen mother - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm not convinced Wikipedia's right there. As I understand it, Queen Mother is just a "nicer" term for Queen Dowager as in the widow of a king, rather than meaning the mother of the current monarch. I think Queen Victoria's mother was keen to use something similar, but couldn't as she'd never been queen.

Queen Alexandra and Queen Mary were never known as "the Queen Mother". I think it was used for the late Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother mainly because her daughter was also called Elizabeth and having two people known as "Queen Elizabeth" as the same time would have been too confusing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #819  
Old 01-02-2013, 08:15 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H View Post

As far as Camilla's concerned, the whole "Princess Consort" thing, like being known as "the Duchess of Cornwall" when legally she's the Princess of Wales, is a sop to people who're obsessive about Diana.
It was Camilla who chose to be known as The Duchess of Cornwall after her marriage, she's extremely mindful of the world she came into in 2005. Diana carried a lot of weight in this world and Camilla needed to show she wasn't about the come in step on everyones toes. It was a great choice. It was Charles and the BRF press wheel that mentioned The Princess Consort issue first, that was to keep Diana fans at bay.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H View Post
Queen Victoria is sometimes referred to as "Queen Victoria, Duchess of Lancaster," but that's incorrect - Queens Regnant are Dukes of Lancaster..
Someone earlier posted the fact Victoria used the Duchess of Lancaster when she wished to travel without anyone knowing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H View Post
I'm not convinced Wikipedia's right there. As I understand it, Queen Mother is just a "nicer" term for Queen Dowager as in the widow of a king, rather than meaning the mother of the current monarch. I think Queen Victoria's mother was keen to use something similar, but couldn't as she'd never been queen.

Queen Alexandra and Queen Mary were never known as "the Queen Mother". I think it was used for the late Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother mainly because her daughter was also called Elizabeth and having two people known as "Queen Elizabeth" as the same time would have been too confusing.

You're right in that it was used for QM because her daughter was named Elizabeth. But if you look at Wikipedia's Queen Dowager page, you'll see Queen Mother listed alongside Queen Dowager and Dowager Queen. Wikipedia has a separate page for Queen Mother's because it lists Queen Mothers not just Dowager Queens. Difference being you can be a Dowager Queen and not a Queen's Mother.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #820  
Old 01-02-2013, 08:23 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 3,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H View Post
As far as Camilla's concerned, the whole "Princess Consort" thing, like being known as "the Duchess of Cornwall" when legally she's the Princess of Wales, is a sop to people who're obsessive about Diana. What happened to Diana was tragic, but hopefully by the time Charles becomes king people will have moved on from it and Camilla will have the title of queen.
Yes, Camilla is legally The Princess of Wales but she's also legally The Duchess of Cornwall and The Duchess of Rothesay in Scotland. When Camilla married Charles, she became entitled to use the feminine version of any of Charles' titles as her style.

This is what got me thinking on perhaps the Duchess of Lancaster. Its been stated that as Charles would no longer be a prince, Princess Consort would be something that would have to involve legislature. If he is King Charles, Duke of Lancaster, then perhaps she'd be legally the Duchess of Lancaster as the roles are written now.

I really do think though after watching and reading all the discussions and in and outs about equal primogeniture, they'll probably just pass it for the line of succession to the Crown. Everything else will go by the book and tradition as far as titles and styles go. Parliament has much more pressing matters to deal with than debate what Camilla should or should not be called.
__________________

__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Act of Settlement 1701 and the Line of Succession Elise,LadyofLancaster British Royals 926 04-15-2014 11:41 PM
Succession Issues ladybelline Imperial Family of Japan 918 11-02-2013 12:14 PM
Rules of Succession CrownPrinceLorenzo Royalty Past, Present, and Future 95 10-25-2012 01:55 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events duchess of cambridge style fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta cristina infanta elena infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg ottoman pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince laurent prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess claire princess elisabeth princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess marie princess mary princess of asturias queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia spain state visit wedding william


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]