The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #41  
Old 11-07-2007, 04:26 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,843
Indeed. But if it does, and it does show what they say it does, does it really matter aside from the drugs thing?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:05 PM
wbenson's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,248
Not at all
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:14 PM
TheTruth's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,682
May I just say that the video might be a hoax ? It's easy to make someone look like a member of the royal family. Here's an example : CNN - 'Conned by cunning fraudsters' - Oct. 9, 1996
__________________

Please, help find a cure for ALS

Because it matters...
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:21 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,843
Could be but if it was a hoax why not go for the seniors?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:53 PM
TheTruth's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan View Post
Could be but if it was a hoax why not go for the seniors?
Good question. Perhaps they thought it would be less risky to attack a non-senior... I do hope it's a hoax for the people concerned.
__________________

Please, help find a cure for ALS

Because it matters...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:50 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan View Post
I think you've got that slightly wrong. The video is footage of a Royal and an aide engaging in a sexual act. The aide also takes cocaine with the help of a Harrods card.
I think we need to clarify what is being claimed (my bolding)...

From BBC News 29 October:
According to the Sunday Times, the caller then claimed that he had a video tape showing the aide performing oral sex on someone, whom the alleged blackmailer indicated was the Royal Family member. During further calls, one of the men said that he had footage of an aide snorting cocaine, the paper adds.

From the Telegraph.co.uk 30 October:
Immediate doubt was thrown on the claims when the lawyer representing the 30-year-old suspect said: "I wish to state that there is no tape of a sex act in existence.
What there is in existence are tapes, both audio and visual, of an assistant to a member of the Royal Family boasting of how he received a sex act from this [member of the] royal family — whether that act took place or not I don't know."
[the tape] allegedly shows cocaine being cut up on a coffee table with a Harrods charge card before being sniffed by the aide.

So, based on what has been reported, there is no smoking gun but a video and audio tape of the aide "boasting", "making claims", and snorting a substance.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-08-2007, 08:17 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas Fort Worth, United States
Posts: 211
Then WHY would there have been even an attempt at blackmail of a member of the Royal Family? An AIDE is videotaped/recorded making an allegation and cutting up coke on a table top and that is it? If I was that Royal family member it would have taken me a month to stop laughing so hard at the absolute STUPIDITY of the moron making the attempt, that I would have been able to use the phone to call the Police.

Sorry, that doesn't even pass the stupid grin test.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-08-2007, 08:25 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondBrg View Post
Then WHY would there have been even an attempt at blackmail of a member of the Royal Family? An AIDE is videotaped/recorded making an allegation and cutting up coke on a table top and that is it? If I was that Royal family member it would have taken me a month to stop laughing so hard at the absolute STUPIDITY of the moron making the attempt, that I would have been able to use the phone to call the Police.

Sorry, that doesn't even pass the stupid grin test.
Yes, but I think it was the right decision to let such a criminal attempt at blackmail not go unpunished. Lord Voldemort could have told the guys to try it with a better story next time and p*** off, but he decided to do the right thing on informing the police, even though he must have known what these allegations could mean for him personally. So in my eyes he has earned respect for this!
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-08-2007, 09:36 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas Fort Worth, United States
Posts: 211
I think you missed my point, there is obviously a great deal more to this and there is obviously a cover up underway. One does not blackmail someone over what an employee does or alleges unless the person is an idiot.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-08-2007, 10:45 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,843
No Royal sex tape? How dissapointing...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:40 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington, D.C., United States
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondBrg View Post
I think you missed my point, there is obviously a great deal more to this and there is obviously a cover up underway. One does not blackmail someone over what an employee does or alleges unless the person is an idiot.
I disagree on both points.

First of all, I don't see any signs that there's a cover up underway at all. Lord Voldemort reported the crime to the police, the court is shielding the identity of the victims as they might any victim of a high-profile case, and the Palace has said that the Queen stands behind her relative. That's all on the public record, just as "Lord Voldemort's" identity will be (presumably) as the court proceedings continue.

Second, I think it's very clear why the alleged blackmailer did what he supposedly did -- he believed he could extort money from a member of the royal family in order to avoid even the *hint* of scandal that might come from having some aide make these claims.

If Lord Voldemort were concerned about suggestions that he might be gay, or that he has some connection to drugs, maybe he would have paid up.

But, since he didn't, we have to assume that he's secure enough in who he is -- whether he's gay or not -- that he's not going to be victimized. It must be a very tough decision to chose between submitting to blackmail or risking your reputation. I say, good for him!

Incidentally, we really ought to all be careful about throwing "guilt" around when talking about this. Not only is Lord Voldemort not on trial and not "guilty" of anything in this, but the alleged blackmailer is, I believe, also innocent until proven guilty.

kal
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-08-2007, 02:12 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas Fort Worth, United States
Posts: 211
I have never suggested that anyone is guilty of anything, much less an alleged victim.

I do not know and could care even less if a member of the Royal Family has gay, straight or animal sex, if it does not involve me, it is none of my business and from everything that has been posted here that I have read, no one has even suggested that the alleged sexual activity was illegal.

As to the alleged drug use, I understand that it was someone other than a member of the Royal Family that supposedly indulged.

There is no "hint" of scandal or anything else IF it does not involve a member of the Royal Family, rather just a common aide.

If even the so called "hint" of scandal was to be avoided, not only would the alleged incident not have been reported, it would have been totally ignored like the Royal Family does everything else they rather not be involved with. I don't know so much about paying up, if the allegations are true, how long does it take to make several hundred copies?

Once again, we have British appearances and "what will people think" to deal with as the primary consideration?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:57 PM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondBrg View Post
Once again, we have British appearances and "what will people think" to deal with as the primary consideration?
Huh? The primary consideration is a blackmail attempt whch has been reported to the police and is now being dealt with by a court in criminal proceedings.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-09-2007, 12:32 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas Fort Worth, United States
Posts: 211
Warren

IF the unnamed Royal is not in the alleged video either involved in a sex act or doing drugs, can you please explain to me why said Royal would react at all, in anyway to a blackmail attempt because some servant is cutting cocaine on a table or is speaking an allegation regarding said Royal? I just do not understand that. Without some direct link to the Royal, how is the Royal involved in anyway and why would any blackmailer think for a moment that said Royal would be forthcoming with any kind of monetary payment?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-09-2007, 03:19 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondBrg View Post
... can you please explain to me why said Royal would react at all, in anyway to a blackmail attempt
Not being privvy to the thought processes of said semi-Royal, but I'd imagine he did what most people would do if faced with a blackmail threat... go to the police. That course of action is neither surprising nor suspicious.

Why would they have thought he would pay up? Maybe they had snorted too much coke, maybe they aren't very bright, maybe there is an element of truth in there somewhere. We can speculate all day, but until (or if) the proceedings are made public we won't know what was going on, and even then, the blackmailers will be on trial, not M'Lord.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-09-2007, 12:51 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas Fort Worth, United States
Posts: 211
In the past Royals have gone to some lengths not to become involved in police and other legal matters.

It is well established that the media will make something up, if need be, to sell their papers, much less have something concrete to work with. The Royal involved had to know that would attract international attention and being international whatever a British Judge/Court had to say would be meaningless as far as that Royal's identity was concerned.

With the above being the case, no, I don't agree that most people would go to the Police at all, especially if they were not involved at all.

IF however they were involved and their bright and happy face was in full view on a videotape, that would be a completely different matter.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
abdication, fleet street, scandals, tabloid press


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
King George VI (1895-1952) gaoshan1021 British Royal History 146 11-26-2014 06:34 PM
King George V (1865-1936) elenaris British Royal History 93 10-07-2014 02:19 AM
The Windsors, the Media, and tell-all Books ysbel British Royals 27 05-24-2012 01:07 PM
The Monarchy And The Media Alexandria Royal House of Norway 12 04-08-2004 04:06 PM




Popular Tags
abdication belgium birth brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events fashion germany grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king constantine ii king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympic games ottoman pieter van vollenhoven pregnancy president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince daniel prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess ariane princess astrid princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen anne-marie queen fabiola queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]