The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:14 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Asheville, United States
Posts: 2
Marion Crawford, Governess of Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret

I have just finished rereading The Little Princesses by Marion Crawford, and cant find anything in the book that could have upset the Queen Mother so I am wondering if the story that she dropped Ms. Crawford is true ?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:22 PM
norwegianne's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 5,998
I don't think it was as much the actual content of the book as it was the fact that someone they trusted went out and told stories from their private lives. At least that is how I thought it was.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:24 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,899
Yes, apparently it's true.

I think the reason the Queen Mother reacted the way she did was simply that one of the trusted staff had written a book about the royal family that hadn't been authorised or otherwise controlled by the royal family and household. It wasn't so much the content (athough I did read that the Queen Mother was upset that Miss Crawford had mentioned about Princess Margaret not being particularly physically strong) as the principle of the thing.

I think they figured that if other people saw that there had been severe consequences from the royal family for Miss Crawford as a result of writing her book, they'd be less likely to be tempted to do likewise.

That sort of thing doesn't work nowadays, though! People don't care as much what the royal family think, papers are offering a lot of money for revelations, and the public seems to be avid to read any tidbits about the private lives of celebrities and other famous people.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:24 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Asheville, United States
Posts: 2
now that I can understand, they do have to protect their privacy.I just felt there was a lot of love for the family from Ms. Crawford.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:26 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,899
Well, they probably felt rather betrayed and closed ranks against her.

It's not unknown for members of the British upper classes to freeze out people who are considered unwelcome in their circle. They can be very good at it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2005, 01:47 AM
sara1981's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,451
I never heard that before! how she did trick to Royal Family they wont given to change as circle as Royal Family that not right! need to respect by HM Queen Mother and HM Queen 2 she is member of Royal Family? or she have title?

Sara Boyce
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2005, 03:45 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,899
Sara, Marion Crawford was the governess hired by Elizabeth Duchess of York to look after and teach Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret in the early 1930s, and she stayed until Princess Elizabeth was married, so she was with the family during the abdication, the second world war, and Princess Elizabeth's courtship with Prince Philip. She was an employee, not a family friend. She finally left royal service after her own marriage, which she'd put off several times because Queen Elizabeth never thought it was convenient to let her leave earlier; she was somewhere around 40 when she finally got married.

It seems to have been her husband who persuaded her to write this book because she was being offered quite a lot of money to do so; some people had already written about the royal family, but their articles and books were always either invited by the royal family or at least pretty heavily controlled so that the message going out was the one the royal family wanted to project. In contrast, Marion Crawford's book was her own work with no input from the royal family. She'd previously asked permission from Queen Elizabeth (the Queen Mum, not the present sovereign) to contribute some articles to a magazine and been refused, so Queen Elizabeth was very annoyed that she went ahead with this book.

And, just as with the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, when Queen Elizabeth took against someone, she never, ever let it drop. Marion Crawford was made to leave her grace and favour residence, and the royal family behaved as though she didn't exist, except that acts of personal betrayal toward the family were known from then on as "doing a Crawfie."

Interestingly, it seems as though Queen Elizabeth was prepared to let Miss Crawford contribute to articles about the royal family in American magazines as long as she didn't put her name to them, according to this article:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/monarchy/s...336142,00.html
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2005, 08:07 PM
sara1981's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
Sara, Marion Crawford was the governess hired by Elizabeth Duchess of York to look after and teach Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret in the early 1930s...,
thanks for answer! i never knew about her
Sara Boyce
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-08-2005, 12:56 AM
tiaraprin's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,839
When Marion Crawford died, not one Royal sent condolences, flowers, or attended the funeral. I think their anger at her was unwarranted because she never said anything that was of substance or damaging. She was promoting them (and herself albeit) in a positive manner, not negative.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2006, 04:07 PM
Jim Jim is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiaraprin
When Marion Crawford died, not one Royal sent condolences, flowers, or attended the funeral. I think their anger at her was unwarranted because she never said anything that was of substance or damaging. She was promoting them (and herself albeit) in a positive manner, not negative.
I find it interesting how unforgiving the royals can be.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-16-2006, 07:48 PM
Esmeralda's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 28
The British upper classes make an art form out of being unforgiving to transgressors, but even in that context the Queen Mother was an absolute master. Marion Crawford might not have been treated quite as badly by some other royals.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-17-2006, 01:31 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,118
Marion Crawford was seen to have betrayed the trust placed in her by the King and Queen. No matter how innocuous the breach, the principles of confidentiality and absolute discretion remain paramount.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-17-2006, 06:20 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esmeralda
The British upper classes make an art form out of being unforgiving to transgressors, but even in that context the Queen Mother was an absolute master. Marion Crawford might not have been treated quite as badly by some other royals.
I have to admit to being puzzled, if someone has betrayed you by word or deed, why on earth should they be forgiven? If you were kind enough to forgive them, you certainly wouldn't let them back into your circle of friends.
The content of the book was immaterial, it was the fact that she did it!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-17-2006, 07:29 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
I read that the Queen Mum was most horrified at the fact that Crawford divulged details of the layout of the Princesses private quarters and the routines of the staff.

It may have seemed innocent enough but details of that nature in the wrong hands could have caused a security breach in the Palace.

I don't think Crawford realized this when she published her stories and it looks like the Queen communicated that she could divulge some things but there was a genuine cause for concern in these specific details getting out.

The Queen Mother though didn't distinguish from innocent yet misguided breaches of faith and a more willingness to harm someone. The first, IMHO, can be forgiven but the second never.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2006, 01:04 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,899
Well, there's not forgiving something, and then there's carrying on a vendetta. The Queen Mother was happy to let people publish stuff about the family as long as she had control of what was said; nobody (as far as I know) shut Mabell Airlie out in the cold for writing her book in the 1950s, which had some wonderful accounts of Queen Mary's life and thoughts.

Marion Crawford had devoted years to the princesses and had put off her own marriage until her 40s because it was never quite convenient for the royals that she should leave. I think I read somewhere that she was asked to write something for an American magazine and the Queen Mother was initially quite interested but then backed away.

That the Queen and Princess Margaret didn't even send flowers to her funeral was really sad.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:14 PM
selrahc4's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 760
In Hugo Vickers' biography "Elizabeth The Queen Mother" (copyright 2005), chapter 22 entitled "Crawfie" is quite an eye-opening read. It discusses the ins-and-outs and intrigues involved in getting The Little Princesses written and published. Crawfie is depicted as a somewhat unwilling pawn and possible dupe of Bruce and Beatrice Gould, publishers of the Ladies' Home Journal.

Given that the book is such a seminal and much-quoted source for the Queen's early life, it was disturbing for me to read the following (excepted from Vickers' book; bolding my own):

"The Goulds took a week off to alter Crawfie's prose 'word by word, line by line until we had it, finally to our liking'. ... Incidents were inserted which never happened and words put into the mouths of those who never said them. Crawfie feared 'serious innuendoes & implications, most especially as far as I am concerned'. The Goulds did not care. They would be neither the first nor the last editors to rewrite copy."

It is interesting, as well, to note that the copyright to The Little Princesses was never held by Marion Crawford, but by The Curtis Publishing Company...i.e. the Goulds.
__________________
aka Janet on some other forums
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-05-2006, 09:25 PM
Feberin's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore, United States
Posts: 68
I love The Little Princesses it was the book that sparked an interest for me in the royal family and I even own my own copy of it! I hope most of it is in fact accurate. I heard the Queen Mother was furious when she read the part that described Princess Margaret as looking like a sausage when she was wearing her bathing suit. I wish I could have seen that program on Crawfie.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-13-2010, 01:22 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 39
What angered the RF more than anything was that Crawfie had undertaken in writing never to publish a book about her time with the family. She then sold out for money. She certainly lived to regret what she did.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-13-2010, 07:29 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richland Center, United States
Posts: 108
She wrote a few other Royal biographies about Queen Mary, Princess Margaret and The Queen and Prince Philip. The only thing I recall that might be considered "scandalous" is that Princess Margaret may have needed psychiatric help after the death of her father King George VI. Marion had a degree in psychology and according to her, The Queen Mother asked her to talk to Margaret on a regular basis in order to help her get over her grief.

Another story I read about her is that she was contracted to write an article about The Trooping of the Colour one year and turned in a beautifully descriptive story. The only problem was that it was canceled that year.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-14-2010, 01:18 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 39
The cancellation of the trooping of the color is what ended Crawfie's career. Her books on the other royals were just sentimental and often made up. I will say this, she adored them all and tried to put them in the best light. I personally became interested in the RF because I read her book, The Little Princesses." I understand why the RF was so angry, but she did a real favor to us all as far as royal history is concerned.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
education, marion crawford, princess elizabeth, princess margaret, queen elizabeth, queen elizabeth the queen mother, queen mother


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HM Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother (1900-2002) Josefine British Royals 408 03-29-2014 07:19 PM
Princess Margaret (1930-2002) part 1: to May 2007 Princess_Elizaveta British Royals 229 05-25-2007 03:37 AM
Summer 2006 Newsletter: Featuring Queen Elizabeth II & The Duchess of Cornwall GrandDuchess Picture of the Month, Special Features, Blogs & Articles 56 07-25-2006 09:46 AM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth birthday bourbon-parma camilla charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria danish royals engagement fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri habsburg hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hohenzollern infanta elena jordans king king abdullah king abdullah ii king albert ii king carl xvi gustav king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander palace picture thread pom pregnancy prince albert prince albert ii prince constantijn prince felipe prince felix prince frederik prince henrik prince joachim princess princess alexia (2005 -) princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess haya princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess marie princess mary princess maxima queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia state visit wedding willem-alexander william


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]