Duke and Duchess of Windsor (1894-1972) and (1895-1986)

[branchg]

The Duke was the one who always insisted on The Duchess being addressed as "Your Royal Highness" by staff and any guests. She herself never imposed this. However, The Duke was extremely irritated by anyone who refused to do so.

Indeed, when they were in the Bahamas as representatives of The Sovereign, she was always addressed as Your Grace (except perhaps by their personal staff when they were alone).

[Menarue]

Probably because in the Bahamas the people surrounding them were more mindful of official instructions.....
It was after their "official appointments" and were in other "climes" that it was insisted on. I believe you when you say that she never insisted on this herself, she didn´t need to, she had her husband insisting on it constantly for her....

[Zonk]

Originally Posted by Elspeth

It's sort of ironic that one of the excuses put forward for withholding the HRH was that it would be unacceptable for her to divorce Edward and still be HRH. They were fast enough to yank the HRH from Fergie when she divorced, which shows pretty well that the King (or the present Queen) could have removed Wallis's HRH if she divorced Edward, and no doubt there'd have been a lot of public sympathy. I think this was just another excuse, however plausible it sounded.

I think it's really unfortunate that the hypocrisy of keeping a mistress is considered acceptable but the honesty of wanting to marry is not.

Yes, I totally agree about the hypocrisy but it was the 1930's! But its wasn't just the English...didn't a couple of the Swedish Princes lose their titles when they married beneath them (and without the consent of the monarch it should be added).

And I think that both Fergie and Diana should have lost the HRH when they divorced but it was 50 years laters...times and attitudes have changed a great deal. Honestly....I think that each royal house has learned valuable lessons as a result of the Windsors. An excellent example was Princess Alexandra, who after her divorce became a HH.

[Jo of Palatine]

Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio

I It made what should have been a matter of course, a matter of protocol (wife of HRH Duke = HRH Duchess), into an excuse to give a personal insult. It should not have been personal. It was more than unprofessional. It was petty.

Yes, but I think I can understand George VI. He (and his womenfolk) was deeply shocked by the Abdication but felt still loyal to his brother, so wanted him (against the wishes of the politicians) to have the HRH. When you read the protocolls of the granting of the Letters Patent, you'll see that the king insisted on a HRH for his brother while the politicians thought the Abdication Act had reduced the former king to Mr. Edward Windsor, private citizen. So if it wasn't for the king and the RF, Wallis would have been Mrs. Wallis Windsor, nothing more as rank goes. So in a way I can understand that they accepted the Duchess, but not the HRH.

[Jo of Palatine]

Originally Posted by Zonk

Y
And I think that both Fergie and Diana should have lost the HRH when they divorced but it was 50 years laters...times and attitudes have changed a great deal. Honestly....I think that each royal house has learned valuable lessons as a result of the Windsors. An excellent example was Princess Alexandra, who after her divorce became a HH.

But Fergie and Diana lost their HRH after their divorce.
Here's the quote form the London Gazette:

Buckingham Palace
The Queen has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 21st August 1996, to declare that a former wife (other than a widow until she shall remarry) of a son of a Sovereign of these Realms, of a son of a son of a Sovereign and of the eldest living son of the eldest son of The Prince of Wales shall not be entitled to hold and enjoy the style, title or attribute of Royal Highness.

(London Gazette, issue 54510, Aug 30, 1996, p. 1/11603.)

And who's Princess Alexandra? The only Princess Alexandra I know is not divorced, but widowed and her official title since 2003 is: Her Royal Highness Princess Alexandra Helen Elizabeth Olga Christabel of Kent, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy, Royal Lady of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order.

[Elspeth]

I think Zonk is referring to Princess Alexandra of Denmark, Jo (Prince Joachim's ex-wife). She became a Highness rather than a Royal Highness after the divorce but before her remarriage. In Britain I'm pretty sure the Highness style isn't used any more.

[Empress]

I think that Zonk is referring to the former Princess Alexandra of Denmark, now Countess of Frederiksborg, the former wife of Prince Joachim. She was granted the title of Her Highness Princess Alexandra of Denmark, Countess of Frederiksborg until her remarriage, at which point she lost the right to HH and Princess.

She was created a Countess in her own right, however the title is banded to her, and will not pass to her children.

She will however continue to have quite a substantial apenage from the country until she dies, I suspect because she is popular, the mother of two princes, and she still carries out some duties for the Royal family.

[Jo of Palatine]

Originally Posted by Elspeth

I think Zonk is referring to Princess Alexandra of Denmark, Jo (Prince Joachim's ex-wife). She became a Highness rather than a Royal Highness after the divorce but before her remarriage. In Britain I'm pretty sure the Highness style isn't used any more.

Oh, I wasn't thinking of her, because Denmark has a different system of conferring titles than Britain. But thank you very much for the hint.

[branchg]

Originally Posted by Menarue

Probably because in the Bahamas the people surrounding them were more mindful of official instructions.....
It was after their "official appointments" and were in other "climes" that it was insisted on. I believe you when you say that she never insisted on this herself, she didn´t need to, she had her husband insisting on it constantly for her....

He stopped insisting on it after they settled permanently in France in the early 1950's. For one thing, it hardly mattered much since they were not considered to be members of the royal family nor where they living in England. Secondly, Wallis was usually granted the courtesy of being addressed as such, including a curtsey, as a matter of form.

Their life gradually become one of very wealthy socialites who traveled a lot. You don't need to be HRH for that.

[Al_bina]

Duke of Windsor recollected meeting Mrs.Wallis Simpson

YouTube - Duke of Windsor - discusses meeting Wallis

[Jeniann]

That accent has to be fake. I'm from Virginia and my father and all his family on his mother's side grew up in the Baltimore area, also as one of those "old" families like Wallis and none of them talk anything like that. She almost sounds like Katherine Hepburn. You think she was trying to make herself seem more pretentious?

[Russophile]

I don't know. I have been searching YouTube for more videos to compare but I haven't found anything else!

[MARG]

Originally Posted by Jeniann

That accent has to be fake. I'm from Virginia and my father and all his family on his mother's side grew up in the Baltimore area, also as one of those "old" families like Wallis and none of them talk anything like that. She almost sounds like Katherine Hepburn. You think she was trying to make herself seem more pretentious?

I think we have to remember that they lived pre-TV.

Since the advent of the dreaded box,accents all over the world have been subtley changing. In Britain real Cockney Rhyming Slang no longer exists. Just as the Yorkshire or Devonshire accent is a lot more blurred so too is the difference between a Scot from Glasgow or Edinborough. A Northern Ireland accent is no longer quite as distinct from Ireland anymore.

I am guessing that the same is also true of America. Do they really have people that talk like the Beverly Hillbillies anymore?

I was told that the world was becoming more cosmopolitan and the immediacy of communication reflects in the spoken word. That may well be true, but I think the world is a less gracious place and all the poorer for it.

[Menarue]

That is the very first time I have heard Wallis speaking and she does sound just like Katherine Hepburn. At the time of the wedding and after, people in England were saying that Edward had a slightly American accent. I can´t hear it, but perhaps someone can hear what they were talking about. I noticed that he pronounced Leicestershire slightly differently from anyone I have heard say it...I´ll have to listen to it again more carefully.

[Elspeth]

It's possible that her accent changed because of living with an Englishman for all those years, to say nothing of living in France and being around people who spoke English with a French accent.

[Russophile]

Originally Posted by MARG

I am guessing that the same is also true of America. Do they really have people that talk like the Beverly Hillbillies anymore?

Um, yes MARG, we do. . . .

[Mermaid1962]

To me, the Duke of Windsor sounds very much like any Royal British person from that era. The Duchess sounds slightly New England-ish as well as Southern, although she has a posh pronounciation of the word "danced." The "a" sounds more like "aaaaah".

Originally Posted by Menarue

That is the very first time I have heard Wallis speaking and she does sound just like Katherine Hepburn. At the time of the wedding and after, people in England were saying that Edward had a slightly American accent. I can´t hear it, but perhaps someone can hear what they were talking about. I noticed that he pronounced Leicestershire slightly differently from anyone I have heard say it...I´ll have to listen to it again more carefully.