The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #321  
Old 06-05-2016, 11:57 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,940
That is stunning, marinamaral! What a difference the colour makes! The scene is alive now. Wonderful!
__________________

__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #322  
Old 06-05-2016, 11:58 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 12,362
I have to agree with Cyril and Roslyn. You've done a marvelous job. Its hard to believe that photo was taken in 1953 as it looks like it could have been taken yesterday by some of the finest digital cameras available.
__________________

__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #323  
Old 06-06-2016, 12:08 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,558
I can't wait for the next Coronation. Westminster's Abbey will be turned into a majestic place. Just looking back at The Queen's Coronation, I'm amazed on how everything is put together. Today, it would be a sight out of this world.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #324  
Old 06-06-2016, 12:48 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
I can't wait for the next Coronation. Westminster's Abbey will be turned into a majestic place. Just looking back at The Queen's Coronation, I'm amazed on how everything is put together. Today, it would be a sight out of this world.

The Queen will not be very happy to hear you can't wait. I'm sure she's saying ' well you will just have to wait I'm not moving on anytime soon "😂😂


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #325  
Old 06-06-2016, 01:56 AM
ROYAL NORWAY's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere, United Kingdom, Norway
Posts: 3,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
I can't wait for the next Coronation. Westminster's Abbey will be turned into a majestic place. Just looking back at The Queen's Coronation, I'm amazed on how everything is put together. Today, it would be a sight out of this world.
I along with most people in the UK/world hope we have to wait for a long time before that happens.
__________________
The Queen is the most wonderful, forgiving, non judgmental person I know. Sarah Ferguson speaking in 2011.
Reply With Quote
  #326  
Old 06-06-2016, 11:08 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,410
On September 22, 1761, George III and Charlotte were carried to Westminster Hall separately in sedan chairs. They were escorted to Westminster Abbey on foot. When the crown was placed on George's head, a huge cheer went up from the boys of Westminster School and the congregation.
Reply With Quote
  #327  
Old 06-06-2016, 11:42 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,558
Lol, you guys know what I mean. I'm just expressing my excitement that I will (Gods willing) get a chance to see a live Coronation. I have seen videos and pictures of The Queen's Coronation, but seeing it Live will make all the difference.

Elizabeth II have all my love and respect.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #328  
Old 06-22-2016, 08:03 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 7,844
Westminster Abbey ‏@wabbey
George V was crowned at Westminster Abbey #onthisday in 1911. This is the coronation invite.

Westminster Abbey » George V
Reply With Quote
  #329  
Old 07-02-2016, 10:44 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,410
Peeresses robes at the coronation
Reply With Quote
  #330  
Old 07-06-2016, 07:19 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 7,844
Westminster Abbey ‏@wabbey
Richard III was crowned here at the Abbey #onthisday in 1483.

Westminster Abbey » Richard III
Reply With Quote
  #331  
Old 07-06-2016, 11:37 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,410
The coronation of Richard III was lost.
http://www.mattlewisauthor.wordpress.com/2013/07/06/the...
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 09-01-2016, 10:28 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,410
Should Elizabeth II's coronation be televised or not?
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 09-11-2016, 03:20 AM
eya eya is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 14,459
Operation Golden Orb: Codename given by officials for Charles's top secret coronation plans is revealed after Whitehall blunder* | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 09-11-2016, 04:07 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,588
Just brouhaha about essentially nothing. Everything that article mentioned is already known or speculative.
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 10-07-2016, 12:09 PM
eya eya is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 14,459
CHRISTOPHER WILSON explains why Charles's coronation will be one of the trickiest | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 10-07-2016, 01:51 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 4,219
Just as a side comment, chances are that the Human Rights Act 1998 might be repealed (at least, the Conservative Party supports repealing it). Using the HRA to override the Marriage Acts 1836 and 1949 may not work then.
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 10-07-2016, 02:24 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 12,362
Quite honestly, I don't think its going to be any big issue with Charles should he be the only one crowned on coronation day. I don't believe either that Camilla gives a hoot either whether or not she's crowned or what title she carries when Charles is king. She has shown time and time again that she's content to be Charles' support system. I think they're really twisting words to mean something else by stating that Charles really, really wants Camilla to be crowned as Queen. We'll just have to wait and see what happens when the time comes.

I also firmly think its a wonderful idea to change it from "defender of the faith" to "defender of faith". With listing The Supreme Governor of the Church of England first and foremost, it denotes where Charles' religious faith is prominent and with "defender of faith" after it, it denotes that Charles accepts, respects and defends the rights of all British citizens to practice their personal faiths. As the UK becomes more and more diverse, this would be a change that reflects and acknowledges that.

Just my two cents worth.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 10-07-2016, 02:34 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Quite honestly, I don't think its going to be any big issue with Charles should he be the only one crowned on coronation day. I don't believe either that Camilla gives a hoot either whether or not she's crowned or what title she carries when Charles is king. She has shown time and time again that she's content to be Charles' support system. I think they're really twisting words to mean something else by stating that Charles really, really wants Camilla to be crowned as Queen. We'll just have to wait and see what happens when the time comes.

I also firmly think its a wonderful idea to change it from "defender of the faith" to "defender of faith". With listing The Supreme Governor of the Church of England first and foremost, it denotes where Charles' religious faith is prominent and with "defender of faith" after it, it denotes that Charles accepts, respects and defends the rights of all British citizens to practice their personal faiths. As the UK becomes more and more diverse, this would be a change that reflects and acknowledges that.

Just my two cents worth.
I can assure you that, when the time comes, the Camilla situation will become a big deal. I'm only looking forward to the ceremonial events that will come the on the day of and days after when Charles ascends. Everything else will be a headache for the firm, governments, media and people.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 10-07-2016, 02:53 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 12,362
Oh I'm sure everything and everyone will be buzzing about the different issues surrounding the coronation but I don't see Charles and Camilla jumping into the fray and fighting one way or the other. I'd be willing to bet my last strudel that they've already pretty much come to grips with the situation and will accept whatever is deemed "correct" when the time comes.

We have to remember too that the moment Charles becomes king, it means that he's lost his mother.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #340  
Old 10-07-2016, 02:55 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 268
You'd have thought with wars, natural disasters and economic upheaval, social injustice and countless other worthwhile things to write about, the revolting rag that is the Daily Wail could find something more immediate to write about.

HM The Queen would appear to be in good health. It's quite possible that she'll even outdo her Mother and live for another decade plus. It's also not inconceivable that Charles and/or Camilla, both nudging 70 now, could pop their clogs before her.

"Defender of the Faith" was a title bestowed on Henry VIII by the Pope for, ironically, defending Roman Catholicism. You can (although probably shouldn't) reinterpret/stretch that definition to "defending Christianity". However, given its origin, there's no way you can rehash it to mean defending religious faith in general. That would be like receiving the title of "Duke of York" but calling yourself "Duke of England." If Charles isn't comfortable with the title, he should just drop it, resign as Head of the Church of England and let Parliament disestablish the Anglican Church.

Camilla doesn't have to be formally crowned to use the title of Queen (cf Henry VIII's last four wives, Catherine of Braganza, Caroline of Brunswick...) and if she is crowned, she can still be called "Princess Consort" if that is what Charles decrees (cf Mohammed VI of Morocco).
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british monarchs, ceremonies, coronation, king george vi, regalia


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unexpected Monarchs auntie Royalty Past, Present, and Future 86 08-25-2018 08:53 AM
Worst British Monarchs Kurenai British Royal History 171 08-15-2017 07:26 AM
What Would You Wear To Your Own Coronation?! constance Royal Chit Chat 25 12-09-2015 08:43 AM




Popular Tags
belgian book bracelets british royal family britishroyals camilla caracciolo clothes crown princess victoria current events current events thread daughters denmark documentary duchessofcambridge duchess of sussex duke of cambridge dutch royal family earl of snowdon fashion felipe vi forum genetics gordon hasnat khan helena iaki urdangarn juan carlos kate middleton king felipe and queen letizia current events king philippe king willem-alexander letizia lineage lord snowdon meghan markle member patron porphyria prince charles prince harry prince harry of wales princenapoleon prince of belgium princess beatrice princess claire princess diana princess eugenie queen elisabeth queen elizabeth queen mary of teck quizz remarriage royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding sarah duchess of york spain state visit surname sweden swedish royal family swedish royal registry tradition visit from sweden visit to spain wedding windsor castle windsor wedding



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises