The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #261  
Old 04-25-2016, 12:46 AM
LadyFinn's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest, Finland
Posts: 24,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Verseau View Post
This is pretty good timing for this poll, given the king's birthday celebrations coming up this week. Add in Silvia's anniversary as queen of Sweden, and two upcoming christenings there are plenty of feel-good moments.
That the results of the surveys would be comparable, the polls are made and surveys are published annually every year about the same time, the SOM Institute publishes their statistics in April, and the poll of Medieakademien's Confidence Barometer is done in late February-early March and published in April. And the celebrations mentioned may also cause more negative opinions among people who think that taxpayers' money should not be used to maintain or celebrate people who have inherited their position by birth.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 04-25-2016, 10:08 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Mclean, United States
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Claude View Post
I think that inertia/status quo plays a big part. For example had the monarchy been abolished in Denmark but kept in Romania, then I doubt if the Danish would want to re-instate the monarchy even if Margrethe and her family were popular and polls in Romanians would favor keeping the monarchy intact.
Well said! People are attached to the institution and not individual popularity of the royals.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 04-25-2016, 07:41 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 2,802
Could one base the popularity of the monarchy by the Swedes interest in the weddings of the King's three children and all the new royal grandchildren born?
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 04-30-2016, 01:40 AM
LadyFinn's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest, Finland
Posts: 24,573
Opinion in Expressen by members of the Parliament of the Christian Democrats:

Thanks to the king monarchy's future is bright
Often when events of the royal family have a high profile in the media, a discussion is started on our country's form of government. A loud but rather small establishment of opinion formers and the radicals are crying after republic. It can give the impression that the support for the monarchy is uncertain.
Nothing could be more wrong. Let's quickly look at how support for the monarchy's opposed - republic - looks: SOM institute's major survey presented earlier this month shows that only 16 % want Sweden to be a republic with an elected president. 66 % think that the idea of a Swedish republic is bad and the other 18 % think neither. What also can be gauged from the survey is that support for our current form of government grows.
Our belief that the monarchy is something worth preserving, is not about poll numbers. It's about continuity, stability and identity. For hundreds of years, Sweden has had a reigning king or queen as head of state. By the continuity is created a common identity, which is Sweden.
As Christian Democrats, we are proud of our form of government and what the royal family achieves for our country, both at home as on their travels around the world. The positive image of Sweden which the king and his family create in cities and countries they visit, is something unique for our country and Sweden would be poor without that.
The monarchy is engaged in a collective and unifying function in serious events and times of crisis. Many Swedes remember very well the way which the king stood up in connection with the tsunami disaster. Beyond the party politics and beyond the fast pace of society is something else as a symbol of the country.
Tack vare kungen är monarkins framtid ljus _ Debatt _ Expressen
Translation
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 04-30-2016, 02:18 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 7,011
This very week saw another poll in a celebrating monarchy, the Netherlands. Like in Sweden (and other monarchies) these polls pop up when there are royal events. While the Dutch King and especially Queen Máxima are very popular, get oustanding approvals, the support for the monarchy itself has dropped to one of the lowest levels ever. Popularity of persons is not neccessarily corresponding with the desire to keep an institution. All we all we can say that monarchies are not that rock-fast as they once were. Like people only two generations ago would not have believed that the all-powerful and dominating Church would virtually disappear out of our lives and become an irrelevance.
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 04-30-2016, 04:15 AM
Lee-Z's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands
Posts: 2,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
This very week saw another poll in a celebrating monarchy, the Netherlands. Like in Sweden (and other monarchies) these polls pop up when there are royal events. While the Dutch King and especially Queen Máxima are very popular, get oustanding approvals, the support for the monarchy itself has dropped to one of the lowest levels ever. Popularity of persons is not neccessarily corresponding with the desire to keep an institution. All we all we can say that monarchies are not that rock-fast as they once were. Like people only two generations ago would not have believed that the all-powerful and dominating Church would virtually disappear out of our lives and become an irrelevance.
Accompanying that dutch poll the articles state that "the popularity of a constitutional monarchy is inseparably linked to the popularity of the royal individuals", this is completely recognizable in this thread about the Swedish monarchy
__________________
Wisdom begins in wonder - Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 05-02-2016, 01:23 AM
LadyFinn's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest, Finland
Posts: 24,573
A new survey was published on 30th April. The survey was conducted by Sifo on behalf of Svenska Dagbladet.
1000 people were interviewed by telephone between 23 and 26 March.
The question asked was: "Do you want to retain or abolish monarchy?"
The survey from Sifo shows that 65 percent of Swedes want to retain monarchy. The strongest support is among women over 65, but support for the monarchy is fairly evenly among men and women of all ages. 24 percent of Swedes want to abolish the monarchy.
- A majority in all age groups want to retain monarchy, says Toivo Sjörén, head of the Sifo polling.
Ny SvD_Sifo_ Klar majoritet vill behålla monarkin _ SvD
Translation
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 05-02-2016, 02:47 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 7,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee-Z View Post
Accompanying that dutch poll the articles state that "the popularity of a constitutional monarchy is inseparably linked to the popularity of the royal individuals", this is completely recognizable in this thread about the Swedish monarchy
Well, the popularity of the individuals is bigger than the support for the monarchy so it is not one-on-one. One can have a popularity approval of 85% while the monarchy as an institution, worth to behold, scores 60% or lower. See Spain and Belgium.
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 05-02-2016, 06:12 AM
Madame Verseau's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 456
I think who is the head of state - or who's going to be the head of state - impacts the overall view of the monarchy. If the reigning sovereign is despised - or did something completely vile - there would be a call to end the monarchy. Or if a successor does something horribly wrong and the monarch does nothing about it, that could influence opinion about the Crown.
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 05-02-2016, 06:23 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
Well, the popularity of the individuals is bigger than the support for the monarchy so it is not one-on-one. One can have a popularity approval of 85% while the monarchy as an institution, worth to behold, scores 60% or lower. See Spain and Belgium.
I don't think Spain or Belgium are good examples because opposition to the monarchy there is parly driven by separatism, which is a factor that doesn't apply to Sweden or the Netherlands. Even in Spain though, opinion polls show that a majority still wants to retain the monarchy. I don't know about Belgium because i've never seen a Belgian poll on that topic.
Reply With Quote
  #271  
Old 09-27-2016, 11:55 AM
Blog Real's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 1,826
The Swedish Liberals intend to leave Madeleine and Carl Philip without pay.

The Sweden Liberal Popular Party, the fourth training in representation in the national Parliament, wants to put limits on economic allocations that members of the Royal family receive. They are in agreement with the King and the Princess charged heiress, but not the other two sons of Carl XVI Gustaf.

Los liberales suecos proponen dejar a Magdalena y a Carlos Felipe sin sueldo
__________________
Acclamation Manuel II of Portugal: 6 May 1908
Reply With Quote
  #272  
Old 09-28-2016, 04:16 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St Thomas, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Posts: 492


See this post: General News about the Swedish Royal Family, Part 1: April 2015-
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 10-05-2016, 01:35 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,605
Partiföreträdare vill avskaffa monarkin | Nyheter | Expressen

Does this report in Expressen mean that all Swedish political parties intend to rid Sweden of the monarchy? I hope not!
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 10-05-2016, 03:56 AM
WreathOfLaurels's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 435
Yeesh, the turnips have been going on about this for the last couple of decades - what I want to know is, if there is such unianamity on the subject than why don't they just go ahead and do it? As far as i know all it needs is one act of parliament and the king does not even sign the bill - the speaker does (although realistically there would probably need to be a referendum). Or is it (as I suspect) along with the transfer of the kings powers to the speaker of the house another crack at centralising power? Or more pretentious navel gazing? Keep in mind one of the traditional reasons behind swedish monarchism was the idea that the king was needed to keep the politicans in check vis-a-vis the people. Or maybe they're trying to distract people from Swedens other problems like the rise of the far right and questions over the refugee crisis?

Fact is is that CG and Vic will probably be the king and future queen for some time to come. The funding problem can be sorted out easily As a very general rule monarchies are only abolished after a major national disaster of some kind; normally loss in war and foreign invasion, but also major popular uprisings and loss of elite confidence. The politicans may not support the monarchy but a lot of swedish businesess do as its a very good soft power tool and a major part of brand sweden inc. despite the grand standing I don't see it going anywhere anytime soon. Sweden is more likely to exit the EU than knock over its monarchy at the present time. However that said, Sweden was also the first to do away with male primogeniture and the first in europe to completely remove the king from the political process - maybe it will set the precedent for popular, peaceful, and non-divisive republiancsim that does not involve exile, humiliation, or mass killing?
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 10-05-2016, 05:49 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,605
Thanks Laurels, you've been very succinct. That is what I think might happen. No storming of the barricades, or fleeing across the border for this Royal family. Instead, a bit of a nudge here with Parliament taking a little more power each time, a nudge there, with an unpopular King and a longterm Press campaign about costs and powers and egalitarianism, perhaps.

In other words, keep nibbling away at the edifice until it finally collapses in on itself, or a majority of the population finally says, as people who are republican often do,'Well, he's only a figurehead, we can have a figurehead President and he won't cost as much!'

Poor Victoria. She works her socks off for her country. I sincerely hope it doesn't end, either with a whimper or a bang. However, I do feel that Sweden is one to watch for the future. Unfortunately.
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 10-05-2016, 06:00 AM
WreathOfLaurels's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 435
Yeah I feel sorry for Vickan too. She is much more deserving than a certain other future monarch who by reasons of outrageous fortune is heading for a (at the present) more secure throne....

Based on what I know sweden has far larger problems than its head of state - I notice that conscription has recently been brought back due to the threat of russian aggression in the region.

Most of the republican sentiment is really about the fact that CG is unpopular; he's not the sharpest knife in the draw, his views on a number of things are out of step with the rest of Sweden, and his friends are rather questionable. Lets not get started on the rumours about his sex life either (oh Carl you naughty, naughty boy! *whip crack*).

I think some of the sentiment will come back once Victoria is Queen as she is less tainted as her old man and there is the novelty factor of reigning Queens as well.
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 10-05-2016, 06:56 AM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 518
I thought that while Victoria is by far the most popular Swedish royal, Carl Gustaf is popular as well.
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 10-05-2016, 07:13 AM
Muhler's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 9,804
I have a less pessimistic view of the SRF.

Partly for political reasons. I won't go into to many details, but the next election in 2018 is going to be a harsh experience for the established parties. And it is mainly the established parties that wish to ultimately abolish the monarchy.
But these parties have in many ways (in this one as well) lost touch with the ordinary Svenson's outside the inner cities.

And in time of political upheaval people look to what is not only politically neutral but also a stable institution.

Another thing is team V&D themselves. Charisma, dedication and personality matters. This is something V&D have.
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 10-05-2016, 07:25 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 7,011
In essence the royal families are eroding their very own "being royal" from within. Was it before King Carl XVI Gustaf an absolute no-no to marry a fellow Swede or a commoner (both actions did lead to the loss of the royal status). The (intended) marriages with Daniel Westling, Jonas Bergström and Sofia Hellqvist show that any Swede can become "royal". Suddenly that sporty dude from Örebrö, that whizzkid classmate from Djursholm or the fellow teammate from Danderyd become a "Royal Highness", get a Seraphim hanged around their shoulders, people bow and mumble "Royal Highness" and their babies are suddenly Dukes and Duchesses from Nowhere and Everywhere. It all turns out into a vaudeville. It is a pure eroding of the core fundaments of what a royal family actually is.

The distance to the royal family and "the street" has totally disappeared:

You are that hunky fitness trainer?
You can become Prince of Sweden and be father of the next Queen!
No problem.

You are that underwear model?
You can become a Princess of Sweden and a Duchess of So-and-So.
No problem.

You have a child outside marriage from another dude?
You can perfecly become Queen of Norway.
No problem.

The underlying message is that the gates of the palace are wide open. While people have to apply for jobs, show diplomas and certificates, a curriculum from here to nowhere and compete for a "normal" jobs, it looks like for becoming royal nothing is needed. Royal or noble birth? Spotless past? Respectable careers? Pffff.... come on... this is 2016: no any requirement needed to become "Prince(ss)". Welcome in the royal family! (And this counts for almost all royal families, all of them will be wiped out in the coming decades).
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 10-05-2016, 07:35 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
In essence the royal families are eroding their very own "being royal" from within. Was it before King Carl XVI Gustaf an absolute no-no to marry a fellow Swede or a commoner (both actions did lead to the loss of the royal status). The (intended) marriages with Daniel Westling, Jonas Bergström and Sofia Hellqvist show that any Swede can become "royal". Suddenly that sporty dude from Örebrö, that whizzkid classmate from Djursholm or the fellow teammate from Danderyd become a "Royal Highness", get a Seraphim hanged around their shoulders, people bow and mumble "Royal Highness" and their babies are suddenly Dukes and Duchesses from Nowhere and Everywhere. It all turns out into a vaudeville. It is a pure eroding of the core fundaments of what a royal family actually is.

The distance to the royal family and "the street" has totally disappeared:

You are that hunky fitness trainer?
You can become Prince of Sweden and be father of the next Queen!
No problem.

You are that underwear model?
You can become a Princess of Sweden and a Duchess of So-and-So.
No problem.

You have a child outside marriage from another dude?
No problem.
You can perfecly become Queen of Norway.

While people have to apply for jobs, show diplomas and certificates, a curriculum from here to nowhere and compete for a "normal" jobs, it looks like for becoming royal nothing is needed. Royal or noble birth? Spotless past? Respectable careers? Pffff.... come on... this is 2016: no any requirement needed to become "Prince(ss)". Welcome in the royal family! (And this counts for almost all royal families, all of them will be wiped out in the coming decades).
Haha, I see you don't understand Sweden one bit. I think them marrying "normal swedes" has actually saved the monarchy.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
king carl xvi gustav, sweden


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Future of the Spanish Monarchy TODOI Royal Family of Spain 1302 Today 07:25 PM
The Monarchy in Greece Fireweaver The Royal Family of Greece 309 10-31-2016 05:54 PM
Popularity of the Royal Family in Norway Mandy Royal House of Norway 127 07-14-2014 10:34 PM
The Monarchy And The Media Alexandria Royal House of Norway 12 04-08-2004 04:06 PM




Popular Tags
belgian state visit to japan best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark english books fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy myth news november 2016 october 2016 parliament picture of the week prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince nicholas prince oscar princess claire of luxembourg princess elisabeth princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess sofia eveningwear princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania daytime fashion queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria video games



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises