The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #61  
Old 06-19-2018, 08:13 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 24,495
Napoleon bicorne fetches €350k at auction!

https://www.rte.ie/news/newslens/201...-napoleon-hat/
__________________

__________________

16th of November,1528 : Birth of Jeanne d'Albret,Queen of Navarre
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-13-2018, 07:55 AM
EMB's Avatar
EMB EMB is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lemmer, Netherlands
Posts: 248
Western Australia's French connection explored as 200-year-old artefacts show Napoleon's plans

Historical documents offer rare insight into Napoleon's plans for Western Australia
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 04-11-2019, 08:54 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
While Napoléon may have had merits: in essence he was an army general whom commited a coup d'état, blew up the Republic to establish a brand new Empire, raged war against dozens of countries, occupied or even annexed these and replaced royal families with Bonapartes. A man who has enforced millions to conscript into obligatory military service and led them in hellish military campaigns with millions of deaths on battlefields in Europe, in deep Russia and the Orient as well at sea. A man whose policy inflicted a continental wide boycott with as result the Continent being in deep recession and crisis, with starving people, malnutrition, diseases and misery. A man who looted in occupied countries to fill France's museums, public buildings and spaces with stolen art.

Also that is Napoléon. So I would be careful with the claim that his legacy "demands respect".
I am always saddened that Napoleon is so frequently classified as a warmonger and dictator because it shows that people still fall for the political spin made 200 years ago. Napoleon was elected Emperor of the French; although this election would not meet modern standards it is significantly more democratic than the route to power of the monarchs who opposed him. Most of the Napoleonic Wars involved France defending democracy against the coalitions of absolutist monarchs, Napoleon was the peacemaker not the warmonger. The continental blockade against Britain was a reaction to the British blockade against France; it was a damaging trade war, but it was not started by France. Ironically, Napoleon’s victories spread the system of constitutional monarchy, which would save many of the monarchies that had previously been absolutist. It can be argued that without Napoleon fewer monarchies would exist today.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 04-11-2019, 10:53 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 5,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin9eme View Post
I am always saddened that Napoleon is so frequently classified as a warmonger and dictator because it shows that people still fall for the political spin made 200 years ago.

Although it is difficult to have an accurate estimate, as many as 6 million people may have died or gone missing in the Napoleonic wars, which is a huge number by early 19th century standards and by no means "political spin". That in itself would justify Nopoleon's reputation as a warmonger.

Of course, you can subscribe to Napoleon's own version of history in his St Helena diaries that "the British" were the actual culprits for "the war without end", but that would be analogous to the opinion for example that, in the 20th century, the British were also responsible for World War I. I disagree with both opinions and think it was correct for the UK to oppose both the Napoleonic Empire and, in the early 20th century, the Second German Empire.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 04-11-2019, 12:29 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
Although it is difficult to have an accurate estimate, as many as 6 million people may have died or gone missing in the Napoleonic wars, which is a huge number by early 19th century standards and by no means "political spin". That in itself would justify Nopoleon's reputation as a warmonger.
Surely the people responsible for these deaths are those who started the wars; the Allies were the warmongers. Was Napoleon wrong to defend his country?
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 04-11-2019, 01:16 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 9,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin9eme View Post
Surely the people responsible for these deaths are those who started the wars; the Allies were the warmongers. Was Napoleon wrong to defend his country?
Napoleon invaded the Low Countries (today's Benelux), invaded Portugal, invaded Spain, invaded today's Austria, invaded today's Germany, invaded today's Italy, invaded Poland, invaded Greece, invaded Egypt, what did he not invade? How to file this as "had to defend his country"?

He looted and pillaged all what he could use, he enforced conscription for his always man-hungry army, causing millions of casualties, famine, diseases, demographic disbalance, blocked trade and business which was not in the interest of his Empire. All countries were totally broken and impoverished after Napoleon's rule.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 04-11-2019, 07:55 PM
JR76's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin9eme View Post
Surely the people responsible for these deaths are those who started the wars; the Allies were the warmongers. Was Napoleon wrong to defend his country?
It's true that France was under severe threat during the revolutionary wars and like the Swedish King Karl XII he ended up feeling that big campaigns was necessary to pacify the enemies of his countries. This doesn't deflect from the crimes the French armies committed against the civil population during the Peninsular wars in Spain. Another aspect that people tend to overlook is the suffering Napoleon inflicted on his troops in Egypt whom he abandoned when better opportunities presented themselves in Paris or those tens of thousands of men that he left to die in Russia as he left them to try and get home themselves.
Napoleon was a great man, who's influence on modern Europe can't be overestimated, but his sun definitely had many spots.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 04-11-2019, 11:26 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: City, United States
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR76 View Post
It's true that France was under severe threat during the revolutionary wars and like the Swedish King Karl XII he ended up feeling that big campaigns was necessary to pacify the enemies of his countries. This doesn't deflect from the crimes the French armies committed against the civil population during the Peninsular wars in Spain. Another aspect that people tend to overlook is the suffering Napoleon inflicted on his troops in Egypt whom he abandoned when better opportunities presented themselves in Paris or those tens of thousands of men that he left to die in Russia as he left them to try and get home themselves.
Napoleon was a great man, who's influence on modern Europe can't be overestimated, but his sun definitely had many spots.
Agreed. A lot of people seem to forget that the monarchies of true royal blue blood did not look kindly on Napoleon ascending to an imperial throne and the French Revolution as a whole. Napoleon should've stayed at home and fortified France, taking care of his people, but it's easy for us to say such things when we live in the modern age and not during a time when war was used to settle matters between cousins.
Was he egotistical? Yes. Should he have taken far better care of his soldiers? Yes! A million times over yes! He should never have driven them towards campaigns such as the Penisula, Russia, Egypt. Or any.
Many of his solders went insane; those that survived that malnutrition, cold, diseases, battles, etc. If France is to give up the artifacts it took from other countries than so should all others. Belgium would lose a lot of wealth to the Congo, the UK would lose many objects and the crown jewels which were taken from India and Africa, and so on.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 04-12-2019, 01:30 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 76
We shouldn't judge people with ours current moral views. It doesn't make any sense. Was Napoleon warmongering conqueror? Yes but other powers weren't any better. Russia was already expanding to Central Asia and it conquered during early stages of Napolenic Wars Georgia. United Kingdom was already conquering India. You sholdn't judge Napoleon and close yours eyes from atrocities done by other nations. And Napoleon treated people lived in France much better than tsar of Russia or government of United Kingdom. France wasn't nice place to live but neithere were UK, Russia, German states or United States.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-15-2019, 01:44 AM
theroyalfly's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: N/A, Australia
Posts: 1,401
Today in Royal History is the 250th birthday of Napoleon I, Emperor of the French of the House of Bonaparte of which he founded in 1804.
__________________

__________________
'Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.'
~ Chinua Achebe


The Royal Fly®️
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Emperor Friedrich III (1831-1888) and Victoria (Empress Frederick) (1840-1901) Marengo The Royal House of Prussia and Princely House of Hohenzollern 35 10-07-2019 05:23 PM
Emperor Hirohito (Showa) and Empress Nagako mandyy Japanese Royal History 49 08-22-2019 11:51 PM
Emperor Joseph II (1741-1790) and Wives (AD Isabella and Empress Josepha) Marengo The Imperial House of Austria 11 02-01-2019 05:11 PM
Emperor Akihito And Empress Michiko jun5 Emperor Emeritus Akihito and Empress Emerita Michiko 46 01-12-2004 09:36 PM




Popular Tags
administrator alqasimi aristocracy armenia belgian royal family castles chittagong countess of snowdon crown crown prince hussein crown prince hussein's future wife crown princess victoria current events cyprus danish history denmark duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex dutch history french revolution genealogy general news germany head of the house henry v house of bernadotte house of bourbon house of glucksburg house of grimaldi house of orange-nassau house of saxe-coburg and gotha jumma kiko king philippe letter lithuanian castles marriage mbs meghan markle monaco christening monarchist monarchy monogram naples nelson mandela bay norwegian royal family official visit palaces potential areas prince charles prince harry princely family of monaco prince of wales princess benedikte queen mathilde queen paola rania of jordan romanov family rumania shakespeare south korea spanish royal state visit sweden swedish history swedish royal family united kingdom usa windy city


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises
×