the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Non-Reigning Houses > German-Austrian Royalty > The Imperial House of Habsburg



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181  
Old 06-17-2007, 08:28 PM
Toledo's Avatar
Toledo Toledo is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Spain, residing in the USA, United States
Posts: 1,557
Default

June 12, 2007
London: hundreds attend engagement party of Austrian Princess and Papal Knight
...Among the guests were the future bride's father, Prince Peter, a grandson of the 1914 assasinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and an array of royalty from over twelve dynasties including Britain's Lord and Lady Nicholas Windsor...


Last edited by Toledo; 06-17-2007 at 08:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 06-18-2007, 11:02 AM
Avalon's Avatar
Avalon Avalon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 6,003
Send a message via MSN to Avalon
Default

Time to close this thread.
The Habsburg Dynasty: Part Two can be found here.

Thanks to everyone, who contributed!
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen!

Last edited by Avalon; 06-18-2007 at 11:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 01-01-2009, 04:09 PM
MBGGfvB MBGGfvB is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jersey Shore, United States
Posts: 45
Question Why?

I dom't understand why the Austrian government turned go coldly against the Habsburg dynasty; or why it persists to this day. Can someone enlighten me? Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:06 PM
Ozymandias Ozymandias is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wien, Austria
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MBGGfvB View Post
I dom't understand why the Austrian government turned go coldly against the Habsburg dynasty; or why it persists to this day. Can someone enlighten me? Thank you.
It's not that the Austrian government turned coldly against the Danube Monarchy, It's what comes next.
After restoration. And I'm not referring to the usurper Karl King of Hungary's decedents. They're not even In the picture.

The Anstalts or Constitutional Austria that ran Habsburg territories then and now rejected Karl as Emperor of Austria, because he shouldn't have been there In the first place. He may have been crowned King of Hungary but never Emperor of Austria. And there was no prospect of him continuing.
After the first war ended, fact Is fact.

There are 2 major factors the brought the end of Danube Monarchy:
Karl King of Hungary, (His Interference In things that did not concern Him.
The hidden factors that he knew nothing about)
And the Treaty of Saint-Germain, (full stop).

Emperor Franz-Josef's plans Included an Interregnum, a period of change between Emperor 's that would have modernized the Danube Monarchy.
A change In the laws of succession that would allow his decedents succeed to the throne.
A law to bring Independence to the Kingdom of Hungary

(The Habsburgs In there Time like no other family has endured so long or left so deep a mark upon Europe: The Habsburgs where the greatest dynasty of modern history, and the history of Europe revolves round them, not they round It.
Author: A J P Talyor. The History of the Habsburg Monarchy 1809 - 1918)


Modern Austria Is not a Republic by choice as It's people where never given the opportunity between Monarchy or Republic.

There Is many hidden factors & truths about the end of Danube Monarchy. Things no one will ever know about, but you'll always get the conspiracy theorists that will go aaahhhh but?
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:28 PM
MBGGfvB MBGGfvB is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jersey Shore, United States
Posts: 45
Default

Thank you for that perspective. I guess I don't understand that if the Austrians (and maybe Hungarians) wanted to restore a monarchy (maybe as a parlimentary or constitutional monarchy?) why not the Habsburgs? What I meant about 'coldly' was that there is no remnant of the imperial, royal or aristocratic history allowed by the families in the constitution as I understand (e.g. not even the use of 'von' in their names as for example Germany). At least in Austria?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Habsburg Coat of Arms Harold The Imperial House of Habsburg 6 03-08-2009 12:57 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0