![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
More information regarding the discussion of this book will be posted here.
__________________
Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with TRF's Rules and Guidelines and FAQ Last edited by GlitteringTiaras; 05-25-2008 at 04:40 PM. Reason: Title change |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the schedule for the discussions and chat about the May 2008 Book Club book (King, Kaiser, Tsar by Catrine Clay). If you wish to take part in the discussion during May, you should have read (or be reading) the chapters specified in the thread title. We have divided the book into sections for weekly discussion, and there will be an hour of facilitated discussion at the beginning of each new period. However, the thread will be open for general discussion at all times. Please note that discussion of later chapters than those specified in the thread title is not permitted, and posts containing such spoilers will be deleted. If you have any questions, suggestions, comments, or feedback, please contact Empress, GlitteringTiaras, or me.
Sunday 4 May: Thread opens for discussion of chapters 1-6 at 4 pm (US East Coast time). Facilitated discussion of chapters 1-6 (4-5 pm East Coast time, 9-10 pm British Summer Time), led by GlitteringTiaras. Sunday 11 May: Facilitated discussion of chapters 1-10, with emphasis on the new chapters (4-5 pm East Coast time, 9-10 pm British Summer Time). Sunday 18 May: Facilitated discussion of chapters 1-15 (4-5 pm East Coast time, 9-10 pm British Summer Time). Sunday 25 May: Facilitated discussion of the whole book, including the Epilogue (4-5 pm East Coast time, 9-10 pm British Summer Time). Saturday 31 May: Live chat in the Book Club chat room to talk over the book (starting in the morning and running for the rest of the day). Sunday 1 June onward: Thread is available for anyone to post about the topic, regardless of whether they've read the book. This is the time for recommendations and discussion of other books and wider-ranging discussion of the book topic in general.
__________________
. . .
Last edited by Elspeth; 05-01-2008 at 08:49 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
King, Kaiser, Tsar: Three Royal Cousins who led the World to War by Catrine Clay is based on the British documentary, "Three Kings at War." The book chronicles the life of three inept yet powerful men, and the ultimate downfall of two great Empires and one still intact, albeit bruised. However, it is the story of family relationships that is the central point within this book. It is also the story of family strain, and perhaps jealousy, up until the outbreak of World War I and the extreme dysfunction within each family; British, German, and Russian and their interrelationship.
This week we will be covering chapters 1-6 which is the build up to understanding what happened and why. Here are my thoughts in regards to each chapter. Friedrich Wilhelm Viktor Albrecht von Hohenzollern, Willy:
The second half of the nineteenth century produced humiliation for Russia. Russia’s loss of the Crimean War in 1855 laid bare the reality that Russia’s military and industry were inadequate for the conduct of a war. Russia dropped from a world power to a second rate power. Worst of all, political instability in the army and among the serfs threatened public order. In response, Alexander II initiated a series of reforms intended to strengthen Russian institutions. The reforms included emancipation of the serfs, reform of local civic administration and establishment of local representative government, including elected town councils. The Russian judicial system and military conscription was to be completely overhauled. There would be reduced government control of universities and curtailment of censorship. In general, the reforms yielded mixed results. The emancipation of the serfs was so watered-down that no one was satisfied. The continued reforms in education and censorship gave the population a taste of Western-style freedom and the tools to organize and communicate, thus creating greater tension between the despotic government and the populace, culminating in Alexander II’s assassination in 1881. His successor, Alexander III, reacted to the assassination by ruling as a despot. He hated all aspects of liberal tendencies, although it was revolutionaries, not liberal, who murdered his father. Russian society became more repressive, with a corresponding increase in underground revolutionary activities. However, the Imperial Court remained oblivious to the stirrings of revolution. Upon the premature death of his father, Nicholas II, weak, naïve, and ill prepared for the role he inherited, was crowned in 1894. At the feasts for his coronation, a panic broke out and many people were trampled to death. Nicholas went on with the coronation festivities. The word swept around the country – "Papa Tsar" – did not protect and did not care about his children. The stage was set for the convulsions of the twentieth century. Last edited by GlitteringTiaras; 05-04-2008 at 03:27 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Other key points:
Geographical, cultural, and political surroundings, which fostered the downfall and strain (I believe) besides the family rift. "...for this child sooner or later be surrounded by flattery. These are notions which crop up again and again in the education of all three royal cousins, and it is easy now to see how misguided it was, and how useless as a defence against the corroding power of flattery." (14) Extremely important quote from the author which is one aspect to their downfall. And one key point to tone of the book. Had flattery and constant yes’s to these three royal cousins not taken place could their development turn out differently? Or were they doomed from the beginning? Family loyalty: "Vicky and Fritz, torn between two countries and the two Royal families, to know where to place their loyalties." (20) This was to haunt not only the latter two, but eventually young Willy. The three wars for Prussia. Otto von Bismarck. The instability of the Ottoman Empire. Social and political uprisings in Russia. Thank heavens for William Gladstone. The marriage between Willy and Princess Augusta Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Augustenburg AKA Dona. (81) Questions: 1. Due to Alexandra's hatred for Germany do you believe it had somewhat of an impact later in Georgie's life hence the build up toward WWI? If so, why? 2. "Doomed as a failure". This quote was applied to Georgie's older brother, Eddy, which I blame solely on his mother, Alexandra. Do you believe this to be true? Or was there something else going on? If so, what? 3. If Vicky was Georgie's mother do you believe he would have been a stronger person hence "tougher"? What is the problem here in regards to both Nicky and Georgie? The obvious pattern which seems to have carried on in their adult years. Willy, on the other hand, turned out quite "normal" so far... despite his rising ADD problem. 4. Georgie's education suffered because he was the second son. His education was somewhat sacrificed to whatever they thought Eddy needed. Would things have turned out differently if he'd had the education and upbringing of the heir like his cousins did? 5. Would Willy have been less stridently patriotic if his mother had managed to maintain better relations with her father-in-law? And would it have made a difference if Prince Albert hadn't died young? 6. How much of a factor were Vicky's attitudes in the relationship between her husband and his father? Or were Fritz's liberal leanings enough to drive a wedge between them anyway? 7. Did the assassination of Alexander II before he was able to implement some of his reforms affect Nicky's upbringing and attitudes? 8. If Bertie had married a German princess, would relations between Prussia and Britain have been better during Queen Victoria's reign? 9. Do you believe Russia could only be ruled with by an autocratic monarch? After years and years of instability, a small rising class of literate Russians, socialism, modernization, and extremely poor peasants suffering is an autocracy the answer? Is having a monarch at all in Russia worth keeping? Last edited by GlitteringTiaras; 05-04-2008 at 03:25 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Royal Forums Book Club is now officially open! I want to welcome you all to our first book club discussion and review, which TRF's members picked, of: King, Kaiser, Tsar Three Royal Cousins Who led the World to War. Let the discussions begin! ![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really enjoyed reading this book because it gave the perspective from the three major players at once. The thing that really struck me in the early chapters, though, was what a hard time Vicky had of things when she'd married. She was the indulged and adored favourite child of her parents, and then she ended up in a really hostile environment with nobody she could trust to advise her. It looks as though the seeds of WWI were sown a lot earlier than is usually believed.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The early chapters seemed to me to be titled so as to focus on one or the other of the cousins, but then the writer seemed to go off on a tangent in each chapter comparing the one in the title to the other two. Or was that my imagination?
__________________
Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with TRF's Rules and Guidelines and FAQ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unfortunately, Ms. Clay did that quite a bit. Specifically in chaper three, Nicky the Third Cousin, pages 50-51 when she began to sway off into the discussion of Willy and Vicky.
It is clear to me that the author was more interested in Willy moreso than the other two. Which is fine, but it is clear he was quite pivotal building up to what eventually happened. Furthermore, one cannot deny that he is a fascinating man. Brilliant yet looney at the same time. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I sort of liked the fact that she was overlapping the chapters, because it seems forced when you get separate biographies - you feel as though you're reading three parallel books. But I agree that the focus was biased. Maybe that's inevitable early in the book because Willy was the eldest of the three.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Second, it should be known that Kaiser really wanted Germany to be a contender on the world stage, but so did Russia. Who nation didn't? It was the good for Germany at first, I believe... but it didn't turn out all that well. I must also say that I am a Kaiser "fan" (as strange as it may sound.) He the most difficutl person to figure out. Clearly the guy had an emotional problems.. which leads me to the question: Do you think he had ADD, ADHD, or was he Bipolar? Page 11 is a good kick off regarding this issue. What was going on here? Last edited by GlitteringTiaras; 05-04-2008 at 04:57 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's always hard to diagnose disorders from this far away, but I wonder if he was just a somewhat hyper kid who was never encouraged to develop self-discipline or if there was some actual mental problem. In this day and age of everything being given a syndrome name by drug companies who think they've found a remedy for it, it's easy to think of him as having bipolar disorder or something. But maybe, as the Queen said about the King of Morocco, perhaps he just lacked the attentions of a Scottish nanny.
It looks as though the author is saying that it's a combination of innate personality and mishandling by his family and other associates rather than something more clinical.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Clearly, all of the mothers -- Minny, Alexandra, and Vicky (though the latter not so much) -- were not a big help when it came to the development of their sons. All of them seem seriously screwed up in one way or another. I would also blame their surroundings as well, social and political. Things were on the verge of change at that time... |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Really, it's a wonder that crown princes ever turn out well if they're heirs from a young age. Maybe Georgie had a more normal childhood because he missed all the expectations.
I can't help wondering, from reading the book, whether Vicky was taking out her frustrations on her son and whether that had any influence on him. I was interested to read how attached he always was to Queen Victoria.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is possible Willy suffered from ADHD. ADHD children are often very bright, as we know Wilie was. However, as adults they usually find ways of coping with th disorder and become less hyper and more focused, I don't think this was the case with Willy so I have to doubt he was truly ADHD. I really don't see the classic signs of bipolar disorder, at least not from what the author wrote.
Georgie cut a rather sad figure in his early years. Separated from his family in order to serve in the navy, his older brother stuck to him like glue. One shudders to think how things might have turned out had Eddy lived and become King, as he was apparently as dumb as a post. But the author doesn't really touch on Eddy's relationship with Willy and Nicky much so it might have turned out better, or might have made no difference whatsoever. Nicky is the one you feel for the most. The climate in Russia was horrible and he was sheltered in ways the other two were not. I think all three sets of parents went out of their way to give these children too spartan an upbringing, thinking to protect them from the flatterers and sycophants they would eventually encounter, but in no way preparing them to deal with it. Therein I think lies the bulk of the problem, more so with Willy and Nicky than with George, as George was never intended to be King. Cat |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some quick thoughts before I head off to bed:
It was an interesting read. I ended up believing that Queen Victoria was definitely the sort of mother/mother-in-law who wanted to have a finger in everything that was going on - and I believe Edward ended up with the most sensible solution towards that by agreeing to what she said, and doing whatever he wanted for himself and the family anyway, even if it wasn't the most practical of approaches considering his proximity to her. (Or his own messy personal life outside marriage). Quote:
I'm more inclined by believing that Vicky's actions towards Willy was a predominant cause than Alexandra's towards George or Minny towards Nicky - Vicky commented in a letter somewhere that the child she had after Willy was so much more attractive, and therefore she was bringing that one out more often to show than she had done with Willy. I think that says a lot about that particular relationship. There's also the whole "strict private tutor" going on for Willy, and military fascination, whereas George's tutor stopped once in a while to play with the boys. I was interested to note Victoria and Albert's plan for a peaceful Germany, and how botched up it would become. It's also intriguing to note that Alexandra's mother Queen Louise was disreputable to Queen Victoria for being part of the Hessen-Kassel Rumpenheim family - where the kids could roam wildly in the summers. Especially coupled with her remarks that the Wales children were wild… Makes me wonder about her criteria:)
__________________
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
It must have been hard for Willy and some of the other children if Vicky was forever harping on about their perfect dead siblings. Not that that excuses the way he behaved, because it sounds as though he had some fairly significant problems, but you can feel sorry for someone forever being compared unfavourably with an impossible ideal. Somewhere I've got a biography of Vicky, which I must pull out and read. Quote:
|