 |
|
12-29-2012, 01:22 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23
Tessy does not look at all pregnant to me. People have been saying she was pregnant since Gui's wedding...wouldn't they have announced it by now? I think she simply has a thick waistline.
|
I have to agree. I was one of the posters who thought that Tessy was expecting at Guillaume's wedding but in these pictures she doesn't look pregnant at all.
On another note the bride children look really adorable does anyone know who they are?
__________________
God Save the House of Windsor
|
12-29-2012, 01:53 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 717
|
|
|
There is one picture among the many of Tessy where she raises her arms and it pulls up her orange (beautiful) coat and she definitely looks pregnant here. That is the only pic where she definitely does. She is long waisted and could be five months pregnant without it showing much yet. It's an interesting guessing game; I'll bet she's about five months pregnant. But she's not at all "puffy" in face or ankles. She probably is one of those women who was born to bear children, and to look wonderful doing it.
Claire's dress is woefully short. I do not like that custom of wearing these thick black socks (which look like support hose) and a very short skirt. Her outfit would be lovely if a few inches longer.
Alexandra's dress is also way too short, and her hat is unbecoming.
Stephanie's dress was almost long enough but showed her knees and they are not perfect knees. Why are all of these women mesmerized into this shortness of skirt which is not flattering? Is some fashion maven in control of their destinies?
The groom's mother, Astrid, looked divine in her mother's powder blue suit. Simply divine!
|
12-29-2012, 02:00 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 4,395
|
|
|
Isn't preganacy speculation verbotten on these boards?
|
12-29-2012, 02:03 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,431
|
|
I think at this point, Tessy's pregnancy can hardly be considered speculation. 
|
12-29-2012, 02:06 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Nowhere, United States
Posts: 56
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
I think at this point, Tessy's pregnancy can hardly be considered speculation. |
I'm not sure about that as someone said earlier people had speculated Tessy was pregnant since Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding. If she was indeed pregnant, she would surely be showing more obviously by now.
|
12-29-2012, 02:12 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a city on the Great Silk Road, Kazakhstan
Posts: 4,570
|
|
|
The wedding was lovely. I liked the simplicity of Archduchess Adelaide's ensemble.
It was great to see Grand Ducal family and Archduchess Marie Christine with her family attending the wedding.
__________________
Perfection is "simplicity devoid of unnecessary elements".
|
12-29-2012, 02:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,431
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidnightSonatta
I'm not sure about that as someone said earlier people had speculated Tessy was pregnant since Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding. If she was indeed pregnant, she would surely be showing more obviously by now.
|
She looks quite heavily pregnant in this picture from Christoph and Adelaide's civil wedding.
Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding was 2 months ago and Tessy looks at least 5 months pregnant so those who spotted a bump back in October were probably correct.
|
12-29-2012, 02:13 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,730
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidnightSonatta
I'm not sure about that as someone said earlier people had speculated Tessy was pregnant since Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding. If she was indeed pregnant, she would surely be showing more obviously by now.
|
Exactly! In the pictures at that wedding I would have put her as around 4/5 months so she couldn't still be at that stage now! I'm putting it down to bad posture!
__________________
God Save the House of Windsor
|
12-29-2012, 02:17 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: -, United States
Posts: 187
|
|
|
What day will adelaide and imre celebrate as their wedding anniversary? Thank you in advance. Would be nice to celebrate twice?
|
12-29-2012, 02:19 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
She looks quite heavily pregnant in this picture from Christoph and Adelaide's civil wedding.
Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding was 2 months ago and Tessy looks at least 5 months pregnant so those who spotted a bump back in October were probably correct. |
Hmmmmm...okay. Yes, you are definitely right about that photo-maybe she is after all. 
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena
|
12-29-2012, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
She looks quite heavily pregnant in this picture from Christoph and Adelaide's civil wedding.
Guillaume and Stephanie's wedding was 2 months ago and Tessy looks at least 5 months pregnant so those who spotted a bump back in October were probably correct.
|
I agree with you- I can see a bump in that photo. 
|
12-29-2012, 02:26 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 717
|
|
|
Tessy may be even more than five months pregnant if that picture you put up, Artemesia, tells the truth. Well, anyway, it becomes her!
|
12-29-2012, 02:26 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,190
|
|
|
I always thought that unless an official announcement is made, pregnancy speculation is not allowed on this forum.
I know it was strictly enforced in the British Royal Family threads.
__________________
|
12-29-2012, 03:28 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linda85
What day will adelaide and imre celebrate as their wedding anniversary? Thank you in advance. Would be nice to celebrate twice?
|
Like most if not all aristocratic and Catholic Royal couples, the day that union is solemnized in Church is considered the "real" wedding date, therefore that is the day the anniversary is celebrated.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena
|
12-29-2012, 03:41 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: somewhere in Italy, Italy
Posts: 2,020
|
|
|
__________________
|
12-29-2012, 03:48 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,275
|
|
|
Adelaide's dress was nice, elegant and appropriate for a winter royal wedding. However, I think her sister-in-law Marie-Christine pulled off the fur cuffs and the antique veil a little better. Adelaide's sleeves seemed a bit long and the cuffs were swallowing her hands. I'm wondering if we'll see any pictures of the reception and thus, get a glimpse of the dress under the jacket.
In terms of guests, the shortness of Claire's dress didn't bother me as much (her legs were covered by tights) as the weirdly prominent zippers in the front of the dress. Kathleen looked nice in her coat but I'm not digging the hat. Her hairdo is nice but is too flat for the pillbox hats she's been wearing to weddings. Marie-Christine, unfortunately, found a poncho/cape that looks like a potato sack with fur trim. I'm hoping she's got a nicer outfit underneath.
__________________
Real princesses always wear sleeves so why do we all go for strapless?
|
12-29-2012, 04:05 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 717
|
|
|
Empress Rouge, when commenting about the shortness of Claire's dress, I didn't mean it was immodest. Yes, her legs were covered by thick tights. I was commenting on the ungracefulness of this pairing of short skirt and thick tights, which I think is not appropriate after the age of, say, 15.
My French teacher in college would agree the madamoiselles become old enough to dress like adult women at about that age. But of course we live in a strange time.
|
12-29-2012, 04:17 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cambridge, United States
Posts: 356
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linda85
What day will adelaide and imre celebrate as their wedding anniversary?
|
A small correction to what was probably an inadvertent mistake in your post: Adélaïde married Christoph, not Imre. But I'm sure you knew that! 
|
12-29-2012, 04:38 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ath Luain, Ireland
Posts: 4,745
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
|
Some really nice photo's above,also looks like their were crowds of wellwishers and spectators present,which was nice to see!
__________________
April 30th-Abdication of Her Majesty Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
|
12-29-2012, 04:45 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
|
Yes the crowds looked delightful and supportive, didn't they? I also love the fact that the bride and groom opened their ceremony to the citizens of Nancy.
The entire setting was very beautiful and had a fairy tale vibe to it, imo.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|
Chevy Camaro Forum
Ford Mustang Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum
Land Rover Defender Forum
