![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#241
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#242
|
|||
|
|||
|
DNA has exonerated rapists and murders years later, so, that it has no bearing on this case is absurd. As far as this conspiracy in which her aunts engaged is also absurd. In Xenia, Once a Grand Duchess, it is stated that Olga went to meet Ms. Anderson on the insistence of her Aunt Thyra. Only Anastasia supporters have purported that she believed this was her niece, but changed her mind, but later changed her mind because she was influenced by her sister. She loved her niece, I doubt that she could be influenced, if she really believed this. Secondly, in the same book, The Grand Duchess Xenia and her daughter Princess Irina, were going to see Ms. Anderson, while she was staying at the Duke of Leuchtenberg's castle. They did not go. But she was at the castle. Neither Xenia or Olga or the Dowager Empress had any other interest, except the honor of the Romanov's. There were more than just Ms. Anderson purporting to be Anastasia. There were bogus Maries, Anastasias and Alexeis for many years.
|
|
#243
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#244
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, the chain of evidence is tainted. I have never understood why they have not exhumed the body and tken DNA from her remains. Not that that would change life as we know it.
According to several boigraphers including John Van Der Kiste and Coryne Hall, money was not the object for the two Grand Duchesses and, certainly, not the Dowager Empress. She did off an $8,000,000, reward for anyone who could produce her granddaughter. Perhps, money was the motivater on that side, too. And Harriet Von Rathlef might have been swayed by her opinions, too and also, money. Again, I say, no one knows. Opinion is just that. No real proof on either side. |
|
#245
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#246
|
||||
|
||||
|
One wonders if it was all about money at all. But what about the political implications? As at the moment Grand Duchess Maria seems to be the heir to the Russian throne, I think there must be some sort of semi-salic possibility in the rules of inheritance of the Romanows. So maybe AA, if she was Anastasia, had a claim to the throne, which surely didn't seem as lost back in the 1920s as it seems today.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview. |
|
#247
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think it was all about money. La Buxhoeveden was in danger of being discovered as a possible traitor. The grandmother in Copenhagen would not hear of any survivors that would shatter her beliefs about the family's survival. Uncle Ernie fought her beak and claw due to her information about his travels to Russia during the war. Madame Zanotti was in Uncle Ernies pockets. Xenia wanted money, (she was the one suing for leftovers of the Tsar's estate) and Gilliard was apparently handsomely paid by uncle Ernie to take his side. As GD Andrew said about AA: She knows too much.
ChatNoir |
|
#248
|
|||
|
|||
|
So all were evil, except Madame Rathlef and AA. Just two paragons of virtue, sucked up into the vortex of Romanov meaness. Everyone else were traitors or scoundrals. Except for the above mentioned. Again, why not exhume AA and do a real DNA test. Why the fuss?
|
|
#249
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, they were not evil, just human with their own agenda.
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#250
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oooooh,this discussion still going on?Moot,moot to a fauld really.AA was not Anastasia.Freedom of expression and freedom to discuss,yes,always,but this,really,is a joke,a bad joke on Anastasia's expense.
|
|
#251
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was under the impression that Anna Anderson was positively identified as being someone other than the Grand Duchess. She was a German or Polish person, I believe?
|
|
#252
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's a quote from this article:
Casualty of the Russian Revolution: "The Lost Grand Duchess Anastasia" "DNA analysis in 1994 was done at the Martha Jefferson Hospital of hair and tissue samples from Anna Anderson proved that she was not Anastasia, but Franziska Schanzkowska. Contrary to misconceptions, there were numerous independent tests performed on her DNA, not just one. Their findings were unanimous. Anna Anderson was not related in any way to the Romanov dynasty, she could not have been the Grand Duchess Anastasia. Science succeeded where evidence and logic failed. The DNA findings also proved an elaborate fraud by those with inside knowledge of the Imperial Court of Nicholas. " |
|
#253
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#254
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Who was she? Don't know. Maybe we never will. |
|
#255
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#256
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ChatNoir |
|
#257
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another fascinating twist to this mystery. It's like actors. You see somebody play somebody brilliant on the screen and you think, Oh yes! They MUST be brilliant! And they're dumb as a post. And you have these people telling you no, she's not, and yes, she is and there's authoritative's on both sides. It just keeps going, and going, and going. . .
![]() |
|
#258
|
|
|