![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
please tell me, which necklace you can turn into a tiara? i never heard of that.thanks |
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"God save our Gracious Queen, Long live our Noble Queen, God save The Queen" God save Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II |
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
|
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is all quite a mystery but I too love all three she is very lowkey when it comes to her jewels but I like the way she surprises every now and again as in Monaco. I did think her whole appearence that evening was so gracious and the tiara was as has been said just the icing on the cake so to speak.
|
|
#107
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is interesting the way the one website displays the (new) tiara alongside a bandeau of Queen Mary's. Is there some relationship between the two pieces that I am just missing?
|
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
-Ayvee |
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
|
My take was that since Ursula (like us) has no idea of the provenance of the newest tiara, she added the backshots of some of Queen Mary's bandeau tiaras purely as "something extra". I too initially wondered if she was inferring a connection, but there is none.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
|
|
#110
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the tiara´s given to Sophie are probably new and are not from any royal collections. This is probably because the Queen would probably be keen to keep the Royal collection largely for the POW and William (ie the future monarchs) so that the core collection always remains with the ongoing monarchs. As history has told us, successive generations of minor royals often end up selling the jewellery to raise money (e.g. Margaret's children selling the Poltimore tiara).
HM has shown quite a lot of restraint in sharing the royal jewels with her children for precisely this reason. Sarah was given a new tiara, Sophie does not have very much jewellery with great history, and Anne has received smaller pieces from Prince Philip's mother and others from the Queen Mother. Despite her position in the BRF, Diana only received a limited selection, as her marriage was never viewed as being stable. The only exception is Camilla, and the bulk of the jewels she has received have been closely associated with the Queen Mother - probably on Charles´' insistence! |
|
#111
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe that Sophie's wedding tiara is composed of pieces of Queen Victoria's regal circlet (or something like that). Sounds pretty royal to me.
__________________
Janet "We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill |
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() There is/was a fifth anthemion of larger size which acted as a mount for the Koh-i-noor diamond and could be inserted into the circlet, or worn as a rather impressive (!!) brooch.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
|
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi,
If you take a closer look to the necklace and earring worn by Sophie at the wedding in Denmark(in the church), the pattern of these look very similar(IMO) to the pattern of the tiara. So I think they were purchased together, probably by the queen as a wedding gift. It seems logical to me, because if the queen had purchased a demi-parure+tiara to Sarah why wouldn't have done the same with Sophie? http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/a...F15-716532.jpg |
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...rdnecklace.jpg Also, this particular design is by Jade Jagger (the necklace is featured in this article) TIME Magazine | Fashion Issue Fall/Winter 2002/3 who joined Garrard's after the Sophie and Edward were married. So Sophie's earrings and necklace were definitely not a wedding present from the Queen. -Ayvee |
|
#115
|
||||
|
||||
|
If it is that way, then what was the Queen's wedding present?
|
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sophie's wedding tiara was a present from the Queen. Whether Sophie owns it outright or whether it's a lifetime loan is something we don't know.
As for Sarah's wedding tiara, I have read on some posts on this board that her tiara was purchased by Sarah's family. Her wedding present from the Queen was the diamond flower necklace and matching earrings. -Ayvee |
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
|
The tiara was a wedding gift from The Queen and was designed by Garrard's using Victoria's pieces.
Last edited by Warren; 07-21-2007 at 02:56 AM. Reason: added heading for context |
|
#118
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've heard that from several sources as well. The wedding piece is clearly created from an older piece, so this story seems to fit well. I would doubt that it is a brand-new piece that might have been purchased rather than created as a wedding present from jewellery already in the RF.
|
|
#119
|
||
|
|