padams2359
Courtier
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 733
- City
- New Orleans
- Country
- United States
Weren't they presented to Edward VII and originally worn by Queen Alexandra?
Weren't they presented to Edward VII and originally worn by Queen Alexandra?
Its really beautiful,do we know what became of it after the death of the Queen Mother in 2002?
I' ve been wondering lately why the QMother didn't receive a "historic" piece of jewellery as a wedding present from her mother - in -law , when her sisters -in-law did (except Mrs Simpson of course). Mary - she got her great -grandmother Victoria's sapphire coronet( actually,, striclty speaking, that was the King's gift , not the Queen's). Marina - she got the sapphires that QMary had inherited from her aunt the Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg - Strelitz who had inherited them from her mother Augusta . Alice - she got the turquoises that where her wedding gift from her parents and where previously owned by her mother. All these pieces have important family history behind them and passed down from one family memeber to another for a few generations. The Queen Mother, however, got a newly purchased turquoise parure, and a contemporary suite of sapphires, nothing as historical as the rest. I don't know if the riviere she got had any family history behind (all three brides marrying into the family got a riviere from the King, but these jewellery is not easy to identify). Any ideas why this happened?
And what I assume is the matching brooch in the second picture is pretty stupendous as well.
Is the Strathmore Rose Tiara a part of Queen Elizabeth II's personal collection of Jewels?
Yes it is. It was a gift from her father in 1923 for her wedding, although I've read that it is older than that.
It remained in her collection for the rest of her life, though, and passed to the Queen when she died in 2002.
That is very pretty.Saturday Sparkler: The Strathmore Rose Tiara | The Court Jeweller
This tiara is incredibly elegant and exquisite. One of my all time favorites.
Saturday Sparkler: The Strathmore Rose Tiara | The Court Jeweller
This tiara is incredibly elegant and exquisite. One of my all time favorites.
I think I've heard (I might be way of base) that the tiara was in silver and has become rather fragile and "dark" and that's why it's not been in use? I might be thinking of something else.It is indeed very pretty, if a little more suited to 1920's and 1930's hairstyles. Do we really know that it is still in one piece and in a vault somewhere? It's odd that the Queen Mother didn't have it reworked later in life.
As the blog above explains the tiara was exhibited at the V&A in 2002. Since it is very unlikely that the Queen has sold or dismantled the tiara since then, we can be fairly sure that the tiara is still in one piece and in the vault.It is indeed very pretty, if a little more suited to 1920's and 1930's hairstyles. Do we really know that it is still in one piece and in a vault somewhere? It's odd that the Queen Mother didn't have it reworked later in life.
These are probably the Greville emeralds. I have never seen the first picture previously, but have seen the second one (in the yellow dress) before. Rare sightings!