the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:38 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,824
Default

That ugly necklace (the Ruby Swag necklace) was a gift from I think one of the Saudi countries (some feel free to correct me)--and I just hate the thing. She has QV's ruby necklace at her disposal, along with the one she bought in the 60's. This thing is hideous.
As for the ruby brooch--I think it is a turkish order.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:52 AM
muriel's Avatar
muriel muriel is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,136
Default

Thanks jcbcode99. I too am no fan of the necklace that HM wore last night. I also think that if she wore rubies, she could have worn one of the two ruby tiaras she has - the one she wore when the French visited (of which I am no real fan!), or the Oriental Circlet previously worn by the Queen Mother. Also, the design of the dress completely hid the ruby brooch!

Last edited by Warren; 09-02-2008 at 08:12 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2008, 08:06 AM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,117
Default

She also has the beautiful V shaped necklace that her mother gave her as a wedding gift. I seem to recall reading that it came from the Greville collection that was bequethed to the Queen Mother.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.

Last edited by Warren; 06-09-2008 at 10:28 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:18 AM
PrincessofEurope's Avatar
PrincessofEurope PrincessofEurope is offline
Royal Highness
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,020
Default

yes but ive seen that necklace in this b palace diamond wedding exhibition and it is huge especially the diamond drop at the end

although it is a beautiful piece it is actually more a young womans necklace and needs a lowcut dress to set it off and as the Queen does not wear those type of dresses anymore i dont think it would be as effective probably a piece to be kept for the future generations

incidently can anyone tell mre the last time she wore this necklace
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales


Last edited by Warren; 06-09-2008 at 10:29 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-15-2008, 12:33 PM
MARG's Avatar
MARG MARG is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
That ugly necklace (the Ruby Swag necklace) was a gift from I think one of the Saudi countries (some feel free to correct me)--and I just hate the thing.
From what I can see of the necklace, it looks very interesting. It would be better if it were paired with the Burmese Ruby Tiara. Now that is something I would pay good money just to see!

Oh well, if dreams were wishes I could fly. However, if anyone out there has a better shot of the Ruby Swag necklace I would really love to see it.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assualts of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-15-2008, 02:58 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,824
Default

I think that she has worn the two pieces (Burmese and Ruby Swag) together before--I shall check the thread and see what I can find UNLESS Warren happens in on this thread and finds it sooner.......... he's the best at finding pictures.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill

Last edited by Warren; 06-09-2008 at 10:29 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:00 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
From what I can see of the necklace, it looks very interesting. It would be better if it were paired with the Burmese Ruby Tiara. Now that is something I would pay good money just to see!
Hand over the cash Marg.

click on the pic to make it bigger; note GVR and GVIR RFOs.
.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:23 AM
MARG's Avatar
MARG MARG is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
Hand over the cash Marg.

click on the pic to make it bigger; note GVR and GVIR RFOs.

.
Owch! Monopoly money suit you?

Thank you so much Warren, I think you either have the most extensively catalogued collection of photos or the most incredibley organised file folders.
Just as I thought, they look wonderful. They seem to balance each other. They have the same sort of style and design.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assualts of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes

Last edited by MARG; 05-16-2008 at 10:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:55 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,686
Default Big jewels pic!

Original pic posted by bweir, in this post.
A large (cropped) formal pic of EIIR as Queen of Canada, released 2008
Wearing the Kokoshnik Tiara and the modern Sapphire & Diamond Suite (a gift from the late Sheikh Rashid of Dubai).
This photogrpah was taken in Canada in May 2005 when the Queen attended a formal dinner in Edmonton, Alberta - see here for context.

>> click on pic to make it bigger.

~ ¤ ~
.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-15-2008, 02:51 PM
qui mal y pense qui mal y pense is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: spring valley, United States
Posts: 227
Default

Was that a flower from the 'Nizam of Hyderabad' tiara that the Q wore as a brooch with the black and lime suit in Turkey?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-15-2008, 02:59 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qui mal y pense View Post
Was that a flower from the 'Nizam of Hyderabad' tiara that the Q wore as a brooch with the black and lime suit in Turkey?
Indeed it was! It is such a lovely piece. I hope she didn't break up that tiara to make the Burmese; such a shame if she did.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:28 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,824
Default

Either piece is still not on my top favorite pieces, but that is a very nice portrait of the Queen. The tiara looks quite good--maybe for that piece it is all about the angle? The necklace looks good, too.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:08 AM
Boris's Avatar
Boris Boris is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 985
Default

It only took QEII exactly twenty-six years from the reception of the Dubai sapphire suite gift to its first outing in public...
...and I wonder why, because it's amazing.
When I think of lots of other jewery gifts from Arab countries which are far less appealing but worn constantly and then this, nicer even than the Queen's sapphire parure, having to gather dust in the vaults...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:23 AM
muriel's Avatar
muriel muriel is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,136
Default

Boris - Are you sure this is the first outing of this sapphire parure? I am reasonably sure I have seen it previously, though can't seem to recall where.

Last edited by Warren; 09-02-2008 at 08:15 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:49 PM
noldorlord noldorlord is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
Boris - Are you sure this is the first outing of this sapphire parure? I am reasonably sure I have seen it previously, though can't seem to recall where.

It was in the DVD Queens Castle QEII wore it to a reception.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:28 AM
muriel's Avatar
muriel muriel is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ayvee View Post
Princess Elizabeth (now QEII) wore the kokoshnik or fringe tiara on her wedding day. The Queen Mother loaned it to her daughter as "something borrowed". The Queen Mother loaned it again to her granddaughter Princess Anne as "something borrowed". I'm sure QEII inherited this tiara from her mother but has not been seen since Princess Anne's wedding.

Royal Collection - A Royal Wedding

This is also discussed in 'The Queen's Jewels' by Leslie Field p. 42-43.

-Ayvee
Ayvee, The fringe tiara is not the same as the Kokoshnik. The Kokoshnik was acquired by Queen Mary and has its provenance in Imperial Russia.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:48 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Russophile Russophile is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 2,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
The Kokoshnik was acquired by Queen Mary and has its provenance in Imperial Russia.
And just how did May "acquire" that piece of jewelry?
Inquiring Minds wanna know!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:15 PM
ayvee's Avatar
ayvee ayvee is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union City, United States
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
Ayvee, The fringe tiara is not the same as the Kokoshnik. The Kokoshnik was acquired by Queen Mary and has its provenance in Imperial Russia.
QEII has two kinds of fringe tiaras which look like Russian kokoshniks. The first one which she wore at her wedding and the 2nd one which was a present to Queen Alexandra for her 25th wedding anniversary. QEII wears this kokoshnik/fringe tiara in this link:
Official Photographic Portrait of Her Majesty The Queen
This design is composed of vertical bars with the same width but graduating height.

The one QEII wore at her wedding was made for Queen Mary using diamonds from George III. This fringe tiara is discussed in Geoffrey Munn's book. This kind of tiara has two kinds of spikes forming the kokoshnik shape. This particular design is the most popular. Princess Michael of Kent owns one. So did Princess Mary, Countess of Harewood. And QEII also has this design but as a necklace given to her by the City of London for her wedding:
Royal Collection - A Royal Wedding

So yes, the term fringe tiaras and kokoshnik tiaras are interchangeable with one another. Neither of these fringe tiaras have a Russian provenance.

The tiara you refer to that has the Imperial Russia provenance is the Vladimir Tiara which are circles with either hanging emeralds or pearls that Queen Mary purchased:
Royal Collection - Dress for the Occasion

-Ayvee

Last edited by ayvee; 05-27-2008 at 11:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:00 AM
muriel's Avatar
muriel muriel is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,136
Default

Ayvee - You are aboslutely right, the Kokoshnik does not have Russian provenance, and I was confusing it with the Grand Duchess Vladamir tiara

Last edited by Warren; 10-04-2008 at 07:23 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-27-2008, 05:00 PM
qui mal y pense qui mal y pense is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: spring valley, United States
Posts: 227
Default

I don't recall having seen the pearl necklace the queen wore to Peter Phillips' wedding. Anyone know of its origins.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
elizabeth ii, jewels, necklaces, photo, queen elizabeth ii, tiara, tiaras


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convertible Tiaras/Necklaces Josefine Royal Jewels General Discussion 10 06-29-2008 07:16 AM
Queen Elizabeth II Tiaras & Necklaces 1: Nov 2005-Nov 2007 HMQueenElizabethII Royal Jewels 193 11-28-2007 07:57 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0