rubies
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,810
- City
- daytona beach
- Country
- United States
In the photo of Marie you cant really see the amethysts, maybe in person. I think it needs grand amethyst earrings to bring out the color.
In the photo of Marie you cant really see the amethysts, maybe in person. I think it needs grand amethyst earrings to bring out the color.
Yes I agree with you,its not one my favourites Danish tiaras either.In its defence its much nicer option than the Golden Poppies
Our Marie has been seen wearing a new ring, instead of her wedding ring in fact.
Here it is: https://app.box.com/s/0uzfw3ami3wsk4wazzz2
There are no further details except that they are adorned with diamonds.
This is not instead of her wedding ring! It is in addition to it she is wearing the ring on her right hand, the opposite hand to her wedding ring!
Allways the same tiara . May she change it as Princess Mary did with the Ruby tiara?
Personally I always find the line of diamonds at the bottom of the tiara a bit odd (unless worn in such a way they get hidden in her hair), if Marie could change the tiara I think she should ditch those.
I still think that the Queen should loan the turquoise bandeau and the Baden palmette tiara to her daughters-in-law from time to time. Since both tiaras have been loaned to one of her nieces once or twice, why not loan them to Mary and Marie? That way there would be more diversity and we wouldn't be bored at seeing Marie in the same tiara over and over again.
That would have been nice! But I'm sure the she will never wear a loaned tiara. As an alternative, Fred could have loaned it to his mother before he had married.And in turn the Queen could borrow the ruby Parure from Mary for special occasions. I think it would habe been nice if they would have loaned it to her for her ruby anniversary.
That would have been nice! But I'm sure the she will never wear a loaned tiara. As an alternative, Fred could have loaned it to his mother before he had married.
That is true and i also think that Ingrid talked with Margrethe before she decided to leave it to Frederik. But on the other hand i find it a pity that Margrethe is the only of the last 4 Queens who never got to wear the ruby Parure. And even more as it are the danish national colours.They were following Ingrid's wishes, however. I kind of like that there's one tiara that Margrethe never wore, considering how many others she got to wear. It's special for Mary, imo.
But I think only Queen Ingrid and Queen Alexandrine have worn the rubies. Or did Queen Louise also wear it?That is true and i also think that Ingrid talked with Margrethe before she decided to leave it to Frederik. But on the other hand i find it a pity that Margrethe is the only of the last 4 Queens who never got to wear the ruby Parure. And even more as it are the danish national colours.
But I think only Queen Ingrid and Queen Alexandrine have worn the rubies. Or did Queen Louise also wear it?
But I think only Queen Ingrid and Queen Alexandrine have worn the rubies. Or did Queen Louise also wear it?
Actually she has two tiaras although she does not own the flora danica tiara it is exclusively at her disposal. Would love to see Marie use it more often. Same with Mary and the midnight tiara.
I actually like that they don't share a lot in Denmark. Almost the same thing in Sweden (well QS is a little bit more generous but not much). I like that "mine is mine and yours is yours".