the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-11-2006, 06:39 PM
aj00192557 aj00192557 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Moreno Valley, United States
Posts: 32
Default

now i know why they say shes the "last real princess." in her pictures, you can tell she knew that she was a princess. she wasn't aloof or apologetic about it. there's confidence in the way she looks and how she displayed her jewels. it's as if she knew she was above the rest of us, sounds absurd right? but shes very confident. i see her confidence in letizia of spain and alexandra of denmark.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-11-2006, 06:52 PM
HRHAmy's Avatar
HRHAmy HRHAmy is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daneborn
Why on earth would someone want princess Margaret's bad luck and unfortunate destiny chanelled onto a nice young princess like Madeleine
Daneborn, I have no idea if you're superstitious or not but I for one don't think that just because a certain person who owned a piece of jewelry had bad luck means that another princess will. I believe Madeliene or another princess would look beautiful with them on. Who are we to know if it will bring bad luck or not?
__________________
HRHAmy
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-13-2006, 09:55 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,708
Default

Margaret's jewels are not that important to the overall Royal Collection because most of them were purchased by Queen Mary and passed on, or Margaret herself acquired the pieces through her mother or during her marriage.

We have to wait and see which pieces end up on the block. Certainly, I would hope the Teck diamond necklace and Queen Mary's diamond earrings are retained by Viscount Linley.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-13-2006, 10:12 AM
Gaël LE BOLLOCQ Gaël LE BOLLOCQ is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saint-Denis, France
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
Margaret's jewels are not that important to the overall Royal Collection because most of them were purchased by Queen Mary and passed on, or Margaret herself acquired the pieces through her mother or during her marriage.

We have to wait and see which pieces end up on the block. Certainly, I would hope the Teck diamond necklace and Queen Mary's diamond earrings are retained by Viscount Linley.
The last "Point de Vue" magazine shows some of the jewels which will be auctionned in june.
Diamonds : the Poltimore tiara, the cluster pendants earrings (Queen Mary's ?), the riviere of collets necklace, the famous "M" brooch, a three dimensional flower brooch, a Rose of York brooch (part of the sapphire and diamond suite that where wedding gifts from Queen Mary to the future Queen Mother), a bracelet, a watch and a marquise-cut diamond ring.
Rubies and diamond : a magnificient Cartier flower brooch, a pairs of pendants, two art-deco bracelets and two rings. One is a marquise-cut diamond surrounded by rubies. The other is a half hoop with three rubies.
Pearls : The five rows necklace.
The article doesn't mention the Teck circle tiara-necklace, nor the turquoise parure (the old set and the new pieces), nor the papyrus tiara... Hope these will be retained by the family ?
We are still waiting for the catalog...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-13-2006, 05:18 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,708
Default

The turquoise parure also belonged to Queen Mary and was given to the Queen Mother as a wedding gift. She never wore it and gave it to Margaret for her 21st birthday.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-13-2006, 05:38 PM
Gaël LE BOLLOCQ Gaël LE BOLLOCQ is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saint-Denis, France
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
The turquoise parure also belonged to Queen Mary and was given to the Queen Mother as a wedding gift. She never wore it and gave it to Margaret for her 21st birthday.
I knew The Gloucester's turquoise parure had belonged to Queen Mary's family.
I didn't about The Queen Mother's one. The gift was from King George, not from Queen Mary.
Princess Margaret has added two new pieces to the set : a bow brooch and a ring.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-15-2006, 07:55 AM
foiegrass's Avatar
foiegrass foiegrass is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 272
Default

Queen Mary is very generous.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:20 AM
Hans Hans is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 77
Default

I have seen once pictures of HM the Queen-Mother wearing the Turquoise parure. I think it was on Danjel's site.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:46 AM
Hereditary Mapmaker Hereditary Mapmaker is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 122
Default Persian Turqoise Tiara

You're right, Hans. There are actually two pics of the Queen Mother wearing the tiara. I have copies and will try to get them posted.

Mapper
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-15-2006, 11:27 AM
michelleq's Avatar
michelleq michelleq is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 580
Default

Mapper:

I would love to see those photos also. I love the Turquoise Tiara.
__________________
"Love thy neighbor as thyself"
"Hate stirreth up strifes; but love covereth all sins"
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 04-15-2006, 01:11 PM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,812
Default

Three tiara pics, here.
(Papyrus, Poltimore and Persian Turquoise)
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.

Last edited by Warren; 04-16-2006 at 08:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-16-2006, 07:09 AM
Dane Dane is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southampton, United Kingdom
Posts: 28
Default Poltimore Tiara Sold?

Hey i just read in the paper that Viscount Linley the son of Her Royal Highness The Countess of Snowdon has sold one of the Princesses holiday homes and her wedding tiara from the daughter of Lord Poltimore can someone tell me if this is true and how much it sold for and who bought it? cheers xxx
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-16-2006, 07:14 AM
Chris922 Chris922 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane
Hey i just read in the paper that Viscount Linley the son of Her Royal Highness The Countess of Snowdon has sold one of the Princesses holiday homes and her wedding tiara from the daughter of Lord Poltimore can someone tell me if this is true and how much it sold for and who bought it? cheers xxx
I've heard that Linley has commissioned Christie's to sell a lot of P. Margaret's belongings in order for him to pay the large death tax resulting from her passing. The Poltimore tiara will be included in the sale, which is to be held sometime in the coming months. As far as holiday homes go, I think P. Margaret only had one...on the island of Mustique...which she gave to her son several years ago, before her death. He then sold it at a tidy profit, but that's been a good while ago. I'm sure there will be publicity about the upcoming Christie's sale, so keep an eye out for it in your local newspaper, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-16-2006, 08:16 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane
Hey i just read in the paper that Viscount Linley... has sold one of the Princesses holiday homes and her wedding tiara
Dane, if you read through the recent posts in this thread you will find out what is happening with some of Princess Margaret's jewels.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-17-2006, 03:01 PM
iowabelle's Avatar
iowabelle iowabelle is offline
Royal Highness
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 1,577
Default

I wonder if Charles would be willing to buy some of his aunt's jewels for Camilla. I think any of Margaret's tiaras would go well with Camilla's hair.

And I wonder what, if anything, besides death duties is causing the "general financial shakeup"? Is Sarah participating in this, or is it Linley's responsibility to deal with the death duties?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-17-2006, 10:04 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
Book Club Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,690
Default

That depends on who is the executor of her will, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-18-2006, 04:25 PM
Alexander Alexander is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dresden, Germany
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaël LE BOLLOCQ
I knew The Gloucester's turquoise parure had belonged to Queen Mary's family.
I didn't about The Queen Mother's one. The gift was from King George, not from Queen Mary.
Princess Margaret has added two new pieces to the set : a bow brooch and a ring.
It is right that the Gloucester's Parure belogend to the Teck Family, but Q Mary assembled both to one, and later parted it into two one for the Gloucester and the other for Princess Margret.

Queen Mary wished that every "new" family tree of her children (I mean for her sons and daughter) ownes one complete Parure (Tiara, Necklace, Brooch and may a Bracelet) with conection to the "older Royals"( Duchess of Kent, King Gerog III and Teck's etc.)

You can see it for example
Gloucester: Turquoise Parure
Kent: Cambridge Sapphier Parure
Lascalles: Sapphire (small Tiara from Queen Victoria)

So the auctioned items are not really linked with the royal family like other items....and remember there were als auctions after the death of queen alexandra in 1925 and marina, duchess of kent in the 1960s

Last edited by Elspeth; 04-18-2006 at 04:51 PM. Reason: Fix tags in quoted bit
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-20-2006, 07:22 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,708
Default

For the most part, the royal family has avoided selling anything that is closely connected to the Crown, but has certainly gotten rid of other pieces to pay death duties.

The Earl of Harewood sold off many of Princess Mary's sapphires, most of which were from Queen Mary, as did The Duke of Kent. Princess Alexandra sold some of her mother's diamonds in the 60's and even The Queen Mother sold off some of Queen Mary's jewels, notably an amethyst parure that Queen Mary received in a charity auction.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-20-2006, 11:47 PM
reynard's Avatar
reynard reynard is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 181
Send a message via Yahoo to reynard
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
For the most part, the royal family has avoided selling anything that is closely connected to the Crown, but has certainly gotten rid of other pieces to pay death duties.

The Earl of Harewood sold off many of Princess Mary's sapphires, most of which were from Queen Mary, as did The Duke of Kent. Princess Alexandra sold some of her mother's diamonds in the 60's and even The Queen Mother sold off some of Queen Mary's jewels, notably an amethyst parure that Queen Mary received in a charity auction.
Queen Mary aquired this parure at an auction? Do you have any information about that?

from the auction photos
__________________
Regards, Reynard

Last edited by reynard; 04-20-2006 at 11:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-21-2006, 08:41 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,708
<