![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
now i know why they say shes the "last real princess." in her pictures, you can tell she knew that she was a princess. she wasn't aloof or apologetic about it. there's confidence in the way she looks and how she displayed her jewels. it's as if she knew she was above the rest of us, sounds absurd right? but shes very confident. i see her confidence in letizia of spain and alexandra of denmark.
|
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
HRHAmy |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Margaret's jewels are not that important to the overall Royal Collection because most of them were purchased by Queen Mary and passed on, or Margaret herself acquired the pieces through her mother or during her marriage.
We have to wait and see which pieces end up on the block. Certainly, I would hope the Teck diamond necklace and Queen Mary's diamond earrings are retained by Viscount Linley. |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Diamonds : the Poltimore tiara, the cluster pendants earrings (Queen Mary's ?), the riviere of collets necklace, the famous "M" brooch, a three dimensional flower brooch, a Rose of York brooch (part of the sapphire and diamond suite that where wedding gifts from Queen Mary to the future Queen Mother), a bracelet, a watch and a marquise-cut diamond ring. Rubies and diamond : a magnificient Cartier flower brooch, a pairs of pendants, two art-deco bracelets and two rings. One is a marquise-cut diamond surrounded by rubies. The other is a half hoop with three rubies. Pearls : The five rows necklace. The article doesn't mention the Teck circle tiara-necklace, nor the turquoise parure (the old set and the new pieces), nor the papyrus tiara... Hope these will be retained by the family ? We are still waiting for the catalog... |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
The turquoise parure also belonged to Queen Mary and was given to the Queen Mother as a wedding gift. She never wore it and gave it to Margaret for her 21st birthday.
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I didn't about The Queen Mother's one. The gift was from King George, not from Queen Mary. Princess Margaret has added two new pieces to the set : a bow brooch and a ring. |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Queen Mary is very generous.
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have seen once pictures of HM the Queen-Mother wearing the Turquoise parure. I think it was on Danjel's site.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're right, Hans. There are actually two pics of the Queen Mother wearing the tiara. I have copies and will try to get them posted.
Mapper |
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mapper:
I would love to see those photos also. I love the Turquoise Tiara.
__________________
"Love thy neighbor as thyself" "Hate stirreth up strifes; but love covereth all sins" |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Three tiara pics, here.
(Papyrus, Poltimore and Persian Turquoise)
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Check out the Castles and Palaces poll
Last edited by Warren; 04-16-2006 at 08:49 AM. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey i just read in the paper that Viscount Linley the son of Her Royal Highness The Countess of Snowdon has sold one of the Princesses holiday homes and her wedding tiara from the daughter of Lord Poltimore can someone tell me if this is true and how much it sold for and who bought it? cheers xxx
|
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Check out the Castles and Palaces poll
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wonder if Charles would be willing to buy some of his aunt's jewels for Camilla. I think any of Margaret's tiaras would go well with Camilla's hair.
And I wonder what, if anything, besides death duties is causing the "general financial shakeup"? Is Sarah participating in this, or is it Linley's responsibility to deal with the death duties? |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
That depends on who is the executor of her will, I think.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Queen Mary wished that every "new" family tree of her children (I mean for her sons and daughter) ownes one complete Parure (Tiara, Necklace, Brooch and may a Bracelet) with conection to the "older Royals"( Duchess of Kent, King Gerog III and Teck's etc.) You can see it for example Gloucester: Turquoise Parure Kent: Cambridge Sapphier Parure Lascalles: Sapphire (small Tiara from Queen Victoria) So the auctioned items are not really linked with the royal family like other items....and remember there were als auctions after the death of queen alexandra in 1925 and marina, duchess of kent in the 1960s Last edited by Elspeth; 04-18-2006 at 04:51 PM. Reason: Fix tags in quoted bit |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the most part, the royal family has avoided selling anything that is closely connected to the Crown, but has certainly gotten rid of other pieces to pay death duties.
The Earl of Harewood sold off many of Princess Mary's sapphires, most of which were from Queen Mary, as did The Duke of Kent. Princess Alexandra sold some of her mother's diamonds in the 60's and even The Queen Mother sold off some of Queen Mary's jewels, notably an amethyst parure that Queen Mary received in a charity auction. |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() from the auction photos
__________________
Regards, Reynard Last edited by reynard; 04-20-2006 at 11:51 PM. |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
| < |