the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:16 PM
auntie's Avatar
auntie auntie is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middlesex, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,078
Default

She seems to have worn this necklace quite often, any idea who she got it from?

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:20 AM. Reason: compressed
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2005, 08:03 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

Margaret's riviere diamond necklace was a gift from her father, George VI, for her 21st birthday. Her diamond earrings were a gift from Queen Mary's personal collection.

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:20 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2005, 07:37 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

The turquoise parure may have been left to the Queen since it really was part of the royal collection and was probably a bit too much for a future Countess of Snowden or Lady Sarah.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2005, 09:17 PM
michelleq's Avatar
michelleq michelleq is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 623
Default

I am interested in Princess Margaret's Turquoise Jewelry and Tiara. How did she come about them; were they gifts or an inheritance? If anyone can, would they please post photos and/or links per the rules. Thanks in advance.

:)
__________________
"Love thy neighbor as thyself"
"Hate stirreth up strifes; but love covereth all sins"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:06 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

It was a 21st birthday gift from the Queen Mother, who received the pieces as a wedding gift from George V and Queen Mary in 1923 when she married the Duke of York. She never wore them and gave them to Margaret.

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:21 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:40 PM
michelleq's Avatar
michelleq michelleq is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 623
Default

Were Princess Margaret's Turquoise Jewelry (Tiara, Earrings, Necklace, etal) inherited by any of her children? Was there anything in writing definitely detaling the inheritance of her jewelry?
__________________
"Love thy neighbor as thyself"
"Hate stirreth up strifes; but love covereth all sins"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:16 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

Margaret's will was never made public so we don't really know. The publication, Hola, stated the Poltimore tiara was left to Viscount Linley, while the Papyrus Motif Tiara was left to Lady Sarah Chatto, but who knows if this is true or not.

As a general rule, each member of the royal family leaves all of their jewels, whether personal gifts acquired over the years or from the royal collection, to their descendants. Given that neither Lady Sarah nor Lady Serena really has much of a reason to wear huge tiaras, it's possible Margaret left most of her jewels, including the Turquoise parure, to the Queen.

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:21 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2006, 01:21 AM
Eliza's Avatar
Eliza Eliza is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Singapore, Singapore
Posts: 597
Send a message via MSN to Eliza
Default

Looking back at the pictures, it's a shame that the family are reduce to selling off ALL her beautiful jewels to help pay death taxes...if what the IHT report is true.

The jewels are not only beautiful but holds a wealth of history to each of them and something that if kept within the family and passed frm generation to generation would make it all the more meaningful. Now those lovely jewels will be in the hands of the highest bidder...sigh...if the reports are true that the children are having trouble paying the death taxes can't the HM help out - at least for PM memory's sake, so that the jewels can be kept within the family?

here's the link to the IHT article:- www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/09/style/fjewel.php
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-10-2006, 02:02 PM
HRHAmy's Avatar
HRHAmy HRHAmy is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 620
Default

Here's another article from HELLO! http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty...ncessmargaret/

It's a shame they're selling her jewels, they are so glamerous and filled with history. But it would be nice to see them on a new young royal, et least this way they will be used instead of sitting around in a vault somewhere.:)

Maybe King Carl of Sweden will want to buy Madeliene a gift for when she gets married. That would be cool.
__________________
HRHAmy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:24 AM
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 17,183
Default

Probably the only time they'll really need a tiara is for the next coronation. And, of course, to lend to their daughters when they get married.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:26 AM
princess olga princess olga is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: san francisco, United States
Posts: 1,303
Default

I'm with you all: I'm shocked, shocked, shocked that they would decide to auction pieces with so much emotional value! You'd think they're out of cash or sth. Although Hello magazine says it's the "shrewd ways" of Margaret's son, to deal with inheritance tax. But still?! Couldn't he sell, I dunno, some of his homes instead?
Anyway, I'm a bit sad about this. I hope that Sarah agrees with this decision though, and that it's not just lord linley's decision to auction that amazing tiara.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2006, 02:54 PM
HRHAmy's Avatar
HRHAmy HRHAmy is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 620
Default

In the HELLO! article is says they are also selling their Chelsea flat for 1.5 million, so yes they are selling a home too. But I guess that is not enough, oh well I just hope another royal family buys the jewels so we can keep seeing them used. The Paltimore tiara is just divine, I would hate to see it go to someone who wont use it.
__________________
HRHAmy

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:22 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2006, 09:07 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,717
Default

From what we saw on the news here in Australia the only "serious" jewels on display were the Poltimore Tiara, a rather impressive diamond necklace, and a five-strand pearl necklace. All the other items appeared to be "minor" pieces; bracelets, brooches, clocks, figurines, that sort of thing.

Any auction must have a major drawcard, and I guess the Poltimore, the big diamonds and the pearls were chosen as the sacrificial items.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2006, 09:12 AM
Zonk's Avatar
Zonk Zonk is offline
Super Moderator
Newsletter Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 3,573
Default

It would be nice if the Prince of Wales purchsed the Poltimore Tiara as he was rather close with his aunt and then it could stay in the family for his grandchildren.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-11-2006, 10:26 AM
Hans Hans is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 76
Default

I really hope that the Persian Turquoise Parure, the Teck Circle Tiara/necklace stay in the family.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-11-2006, 10:38 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,717
Default

Here is the link to the Christie's Princess Margaret Jewels Auction site:

http://www.christies.com/special_sit...k/overview.asp
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-11-2006, 02:56 PM
Ayesha Ayesha is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 16
Default

I must say I'm very disapppointed to learn that Princess Margaret's children are selling off her beautiful jewellery. If they are doing so in order to pay death duties/inheritance tax, then I'm quite surprised that The Queen hasn't paid it for them (it's not like she can't afford to).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-11-2006, 05:12 PM
msleiman's Avatar
msleiman msleiman is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Greenville, United States
Posts: 423
Default

You would think that the Queen would pay it so that her things would not be sold. I want the "M" pin with a crown on top! I could wear it my name starts with a "M". Maybe hubby will get it for me - you think so

Last edited by Warren; 02-23-2009 at 07:22 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-11-2006, 07:39 PM
aj00192557 aj00192557 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Moreno Valley, United States
Posts: 32
Default

now i know why they say shes the "last real princess." in her pictures, you can tell she knew that she was a princess. she wasn't aloof or apologetic about it. there's confidence in the way she looks and how she displayed her jewels. it's as if she knew she was above the rest of us, sounds absurd right? but shes very confident. i see her confidence in letizia of spain and alexandra of denmark.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-13-2006, 10:55 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

Margaret's jewels are not that important to the overall Royal Collection because most of them were purchased by Queen Mary and passed on, or Margaret herself acquired the pieces through her mother or during her marriage.

We have to wait and see which pieces end up on the block. Certainly, I would hope the Teck diamond necklace and Queen Mary's diamond earrings are retained by Viscount Linley.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
jewellery, margaret, princess margaret


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Snowdon: the biography" by Anne de Courcy CourtSprite Royal Library 10 09-15-2008 09:15 AM
"Princess Margaret: A Life Unravelled" by Tim Heald ysbel Royal Library 11 06-02-2008 12:18 PM
Princess Margaret of Denmark and her sons! principessa Danish Royal History 2 08-03-2007 09:22 PM
Princess Margaret (1930-2002) part 1: to May 2007 Princess_Elizaveta British Royals 229 05-25-2007 04:37 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0