The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Royal Highlights > Royal Jewels

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #181  
Old 12-07-2012, 09:35 AM
Artemisia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,421
The Duchess of Gloucester still wears her Turquoise Parure quite often. As for Princess Margaret's, I think it might be in the Queen's possession again because, as far as I know, the Queen Mother only loaned - and not gifted - the parure to Margaret.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 12-07-2012, 10:53 AM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,282
I would love to think that Margaret's is in HMs possession, though it is difficult to tell at this stage. If so, I would live to see Camilla use the tiara.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 12-07-2012, 11:07 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 247
The Turquoise Parure was the Queen Mother's present to Princess Margaret for her 21st birthday so it would be an unusual gift if only on loan!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 12-07-2012, 01:23 PM
Artemisia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldmemail View Post
The Turquoise Parure was the Queen Mother's present to Princess Margaret for her 21st birthday so it would be an unusual gift if only on loan!
I have read conflicting reports on this. According to most sources, the Persian Turquoise Parure (consisting of a tiara, a necklace, earrings, several hair pieces and a brooch) was indeed a gift to Margaret on the occasion of her 21st birthday. Some other sources, however, state the parure was a loan to Margaret to be used for life but, after her death, to be returned to the royal collection. Either way, the present whereabouts of the tiara (or other pieces of the parure) are unknown.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 12-08-2012, 06:30 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 247
You're right - but what we do know is that HM the Queen does not appear to be in the habit of absorbing other family members' jewels into her own collection (apart from her late Mother's which were bequeathed to her). For example the Cambridge Sapphires Tiara - a hugely important family piece originating with the Duchess Cambridge, then passing via the Grand Duchess Augusta of Mecklenburg Strelitz to Queen Mary and then to the Kents via Princess Marina - sold and gone along with numerous other pieces . It is my suspicion ( and of course this cannot be proven until we see them again) that Princess Margaret's remaining jewels are in the possession of her two children.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 12-08-2012, 03:06 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,260
The Cambridge sapphires were the private property of Queen Mary so she was free to do with them as she wished, in this case gifting them to Marina so I don't think there was ever a chance of them being returned to the Crown. If Margaret's turquise parure was the personal property of the Queen Mother the same situation would exist, private property gifted as she saw fit. If on the other hand it was part of the Crown Collection then it should have been returned. We probably won't know for sure until it shows up on another wearer. Right now all we know is that it was not sold with Margarets other jewels.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 12-08-2012, 03:38 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 7,331
I guess you have to say that Princess Margaret wore The Persian Turquoise Parure very well:
Image Detail for - Princess Margaret wearing her turquoise parure

I hope The Queen will lend it to Camilla and Catherine.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 12-08-2012, 06:18 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldmemail View Post
The Turquoise Parure was the Queen Mother's present to Princess Margaret for her 21st birthday so it would be an unusual gift if only on loan!
The Turquoise Parure was originally a wedding gift from George V and Queen Mary to The Queen Mother when she married in 1923. She rarely wore it and gave it to Margaret on her 21st birthday.

I doubt the parure returned to The Queen after Margaret's death because all of her jewels were her personal property and inherited by her children.

More likely, the parure was retained by Viscount Linley or Lady Sarah instead of being included in the auction.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 12-09-2012, 02:52 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 247
TheTurquoise Parure belongs to,Princess Margarets's children not the Queen, so we are unlikely to see it on anyone else.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 02-24-2013, 08:42 PM
Baroness of Books's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,773
I think because HM has such a vast jewel collection, she wouldn't be interested in pieces that don't have a main connection to the crown. Case in point, the magnificent Poltimore tiara that Princess Margaret's children sold after her death and the Queen didn't purchase it because its provenance was linked to Lady Poltimore, wife of Baron Poltimore. Now, personally, I'd have snapped it up in a heartbeat being less interested in prior ownership and more for the beauty of the piece!
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 02-24-2013, 08:50 PM
Baroness of Books's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,773
It's either that or the gorgeous Portland tiara! I'd be satisfied with either.

I should also add that I can't say for sure that HM didn't buy the Poltimore tiara because of its provenance; I'm just speculating that she most likely did not because of that reason.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 02-24-2013, 09:04 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,645
Do we know who it was - maybe a friendly SHeikh who might gift it back to Camilla????
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 02-24-2013, 09:19 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,260
I dont think we know who the purchaser was. Some stories suggested Mrs Marcos and others said a wealthy Chinese lady. As far as I know it has never been seen since the auction.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 02-24-2013, 10:03 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 7,331
I do think its a shame Princess Margaret's tiara was sold. An elegant tiara never to be seen again. Queen Mary wouldn't have let it slip through the royal fingers.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 04-03-2013, 09:38 PM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Princess Margaret's jewellery, including £100 secondhand watch Queen Mother bought her, to fetch millions at public auction | Mail Online
3 April 2013

Round 2?
The article does not state the current ownership of the various pieces although it is likely to be Viscount Linley and/or Lady Sarah.

Princess Margaret's jewellery, including £100 secondhand watch Queen Mother once bought her, to fetch millions at public auction
  • Rare collection of personal items to go under the hammer in Birmingham
  • Items include a flawless 5.16 carat diamond ring expected to fetch £750,000
  • Secondhand gold watch by Cartier, bought as present by Queen Mother also on sale
A rare collection of personal items that once belonged to Princess Margaret is to go under the hammer for the first time at a public auction. The Princess Margaret Collection, which comprises belongings from her apartment in Kensington Palace, will be sold at the 'Antiques for Everyone' auction in Birmingham this month.

Items going under the hammer include a flawless 5.16 carat diamond ring, made for the Princess in 1970, that is expected to fetch £750,000. A solid gold clock with the princess' initial with a crown over it is expected to fetch up to £140,000. Other items for sale include trinkets, paintings and photos of the Princess, with prices beginning at £2,000.

A Cartier watch bought for Princess Margaret by the Queen Mother for her 20th birthday will also feature in the sale. The Queen Mother purchased the art deco watch second hand from the famous jewellers in 1940 for just £100. It is now worth £150,000.

A spokesman for Riverside Antiques said: 'All of the items on sale have been authenticated by Princess Margaretís son Lord Linley. 'What is so compelling about the collection is that it is part of the fascinating and sometimes turbulent life of the Princess and many of these items were personally used or worn by her.'

Also for sale, but not at the fair because of its size, is a four poster bed which was made for the royal Princessesí grandparents. It resided mainly at Glamis Castle where Princess Margaret was born and is widely believed to be the bed she was born in.

v some items
1. the 5.16 carat diamond ring - in presentation box
2. top of the gold clock with Princess Margaret's monogram
3. the art deco Cartier watch
4. the 5.16 carat diamond ring - worn by a model

Thumbnail images form heavily cropped portions of larger photographs.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Margaret Cartier watch.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	20.0 KB
ID:	288543  
Attached Images
   
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 04-04-2013, 05:45 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westmeath, Ireland
Posts: 9,751
I do quite like the gold clock with the Princesses Monogram but I shan't be placing a bid
__________________
December 5th,2014 -Death of H.M.Queen Fabiola of Belgium
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 04-04-2013, 02:02 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,533
This is the most hideous diamond setting I've ever seen. For a flawless ring, it is very dull.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 04-04-2013, 02:20 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
This is the most hideous diamond setting I've ever seen. For a flawless ring, it is very dull.
Here is another view. Diamond ring made for Princess Margaret set to sell for £750,000

It is a fantasy cut that looks nowhere near flawless.

I've looked at all the photos I can find and still cannot figure out it's outside shape. In this photo, it almost looks like an arrow.

Against all odds, it appears Margaret had another 5.16 carat diamond. See
Christie's - Property from the Collection of Her Royal Highness The Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 04-04-2013, 02:36 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 7,331
Her family wasn't fooling around on putting some of her stuff up for auction.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 04-04-2013, 02:38 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
This is the most hideous diamond setting I've ever seen. For a flawless ring, it is very dull.
The diamond is in its crystal form ie unpolished hence there is no sparkle - I agree with you , what is the point !
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
jewellery, margaret, princess margaret


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Princess Margrethe of Denmark (1895-1992) principessa Danish Royal History 2 08-03-2007 08:22 PM
Princess Margaret (1930-2002) part 1: to May 2007 Princess_Elizaveta British Royals 229 05-25-2007 03:37 AM




Popular Tags
belgium brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion genealogy germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jewellery jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess laurentien princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]