the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels





Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #101  
Old 10-23-2005, 12:18 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

So what are the candidates for Camilla's first tiara?
  #102  
Old 10-23-2005, 12:37 AM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
So what are the candidates for Camilla's first tiara?
  1. Rundell
  2. Diamond Scroll
  3. Boucheron Honeycombe
  4. Surrey Fringe
  5. Marie Feodorovna "V"
  6. Teck Rose & Crescent
  7. Something New
Can we have a Poll please????????????????
__________________
60th Birthday of HRH Charles, The Prince of Wales on November 14th 2008

Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #103  
Old 10-23-2005, 01:11 AM
grevinnan grevinnan is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 768
Default

My guess would be that Camilla will be wearing a significant tiara befitting her role as the consort to the PofW. The queen would not do anything that would reflect negatively on the royal "firm" and will therefore make sure Camilla is presented as the important person she is. It is from now on irrelevant what anyone thinks of Camilla. She is the women Charles married and as such she is second only to QEII in the royal family. Besides I doubt Charles would let anyone or anything diminish the role of his wife.
grevinnan
  #104  
Old 10-23-2005, 04:12 AM
zeap zeap is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 87
Default

Firstly, Camilla is not second, she is 4th, behind The Queen, The Princess Royal and Princess Alexandra. Secondly, I highly doubt The Queen will 'lend' Camilla anything. My guess is Charles has bought her something simple and elegant to reflect her unique position.

Quote:
Originally Posted by grevinnan
My guess would be that Camilla will be wearing a significant tiara befitting her role as the consort to the PofW. The queen would not do anything that would reflect negatively on the royal "firm" and will therefore make sure Camilla is presented as the important person she is. It is from now on irrelevant what anyone thinks of Camilla. She is the women Charles married and as such she is second only to QEII in the royal family. Besides I doubt Charles would let anyone or anything diminish the role of his wife.
grevinnan

Last edited by zeap; 10-23-2005 at 04:14 AM.
  #105  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:34 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeap
Firstly, Camilla is not second, she is 4th, behind The Queen, The Princess Royal and Princess Alexandra. Secondly, I highly doubt The Queen will 'lend' Camilla anything. My guess is Charles has bought her something simple and elegant to reflect her unique position.
Without getting into another Order of Precedence debate, for the Official Order of Precendence Camilla, as the wife of the Prince of Wales, ranks straight after The Queen among females. In the Court Order of Precedence (ie HM's personal rankings) Camilla is indeed 4th.

My theory is Charles would have presented Camilla with a tiara on the day of their wedding.
.
  #106  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:57 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda
  1. Rundell
  2. Diamond Scroll
  3. Boucheron Honeycombe
  4. Surrey Fringe
  5. Marie Feodorovna "V"
  6. Teck Rose & Crescent
  7. Something New
Can we have a Poll please????????????????
Forget about a poll, can we have pics? :p
  #107  
Old 10-23-2005, 08:31 AM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,123
Default

Boucheron Honeycombe - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92488
Queen Mary's Loop Tiara - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92490
Teck Rose & Crescent - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92491
__________________
60th Birthday of HRH Charles, The Prince of Wales on November 14th 2008

Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #108  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:21 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,758
Default

I think Camilla probably will wear a new tiara.
  #109  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:50 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda
Thanks wymanda! Of the three, the Queen Mary's Loop is my favorite but I think the Teck Rose & Crescent will look better on her.
  #110  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:53 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
I think Camilla probably will wear a new tiara.
Hi branchg, I'm aware of the practice of buying a new tiara for a new royal but quite frankly it seems a bit couterproductive with all the criticism the BRF has gotten lately on being too extravagant. The BRF must have a lot of tiaras in its possession, this looks like a great opportunity to be a little cost conscious and pull something out that they already have.

With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
  #111  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:59 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
Oh! No! One can never have too many tiaras!
Why insult Camilla with some dusty, unwanted, unworn and forgotten cast off? No, something new and magnificant would be much better. :)
.
  #112  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:14 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
Oh! No! One can never have too many tiaras!
Why insult Camilla with some dusty, unwanted, unworn and forgotten cast off? No, something new and magnificant would be much better. :)
.
But then the rest of us never get to see these magnificent tiaras collecting dust! I mean if the royals are going to recycle clothes you'd at least think they'd want to recycle tiaras that cost a whole lot more! :)
  #113  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:40 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,506
Default Re:

Quote:
Of the three, the Queen Mary's Loop is my favorite but I think the Teck Rose & Crescent will look better on her.
I agree. I think that HRH deserves a new tiara - to signify a new beginning. But she'd look lovely in the Teck Rose and Crescent tiara. Only a few days to go before we'll see her in all her glitter! We'll also see any decorations she's been given.
  #114  
Old 10-23-2005, 12:16 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Princejohnny25 Princejohnny25 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,363
Default

A new Tiara would be nice. One that would be a signature Tiara for Camilla. But, I really would love to see the Teck Crescent tiara on her. That is a lovely tiara.
  #115  
Old 10-23-2005, 12:26 PM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

I'm amazed at how many of us think the Teck Crescent tiara would be the best for Camilla. We all have good taste!
  #116  
Old 10-23-2005, 03:47 PM
ksenia ksenia is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: los angeles, United States
Posts: 53
Default

if the royal family were to buy a new tiara for the Duchess we would, most likely, never know. Since we have no idea how vast the collection truly is they can always report it as a family heirloom or just leave it ambiguous
  #117  
Old 10-23-2005, 06:36 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
Hi branchg, I'm aware of the practice of buying a new tiara for a new royal but quite frankly it seems a bit couterproductive with all the criticism the BRF has gotten lately on being too extravagant. The BRF must have a lot of tiaras in its possession, this looks like a great opportunity to be a little cost conscious and pull something out that they already have.

With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
Yes, but they could certainly dismantle some of the old tiaras in storage that are out-of-style and use the diamonds in a newly designed frame for Camilla. This has been done before.
  #118  
Old 10-23-2005, 06:38 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
I'm amazed at how many of us think the Teck Crescent tiara would be the best for Camilla. We all have good taste!
I guess I'm in the minority! I happen to think the Tech Crescent tiara is ugly and would not look good on Camilla. I don't think she will be wearing that one.
  #119  
Old 10-23-2005, 06:41 PM
pollyemma's Avatar
pollyemma pollyemma is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,066
Send a message via AIM to pollyemma
Default

hmm...the teck tiara is smaller though. i doubt we'll see camilla wearing a big huge tiara for some years to come if ever.

i like the teck tiara but i don't think it will suit her hairstyle.
  #120  
Old 10-23-2005, 08:16 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,681
Default

I'm still hoping the Rundell tiara will make a reappearance. They didn't break it up to make other stuff with, did they?