the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels





Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #201  
Old 01-28-2007, 01:33 PM
Aurora810's Avatar
Aurora810 Aurora810 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa Bay, United States
Posts: 1,047
Red face

It's an absolutely stunning necklace and I also agree with those that said it kind of resembles a tiara.
  #202  
Old 01-28-2007, 02:14 PM
christinacg's Avatar
christinacg christinacg is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 896
Default

I think the necklace is stunning! Its so regal looking. Definately looks like something Queen Mary would have worn. It would be interesting to see it comverted to a tiara!
  #203  
Old 01-28-2007, 03:22 PM
corazon's Avatar
corazon corazon is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 1,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirhon11234
I think the neckalce is too gaudy and over the top. But the brooch is very nice.
this tape of neckalce make a neck very short, any women nedd a neck very large so that the jewel shines .

the neck is very queen's mary style.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #204  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:09 PM
Avalon's Avatar
Avalon Avalon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to Avalon
Default

WOW! Thanks Waren for the pictures, the necklace is gorgeous. Or better, the Duchess looks stunning wearing that necklace, there are few people it would actually suit.
At last the Royal Family has found someone, who can wear Queen Mary's jewels with a style!
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen!

Last edited by Avalon; 01-28-2007 at 04:24 PM.
  #205  
Old 01-28-2007, 05:08 PM
AuroraB AuroraB is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avalon
WOW! Thanks Waren for the pictures, the necklace is gorgeous. Or better, the Duchess looks stunning wearing that necklace, there are few people it would actually suit.
At last the Royal Family has found someone, who can wear Queen Mary's jewels with a style!
Avalon,
I totally agree. Now all we need is a smashing tiara (and earrings, possibly a stomacher?) to create spectacular bling.
  #206  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:34 PM
Scarebaby Scarebaby is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 15
Default ooh a stomacher!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AuroraB
Avalon,
I totally agree. Now all we need is a smashing tiara (and earrings, possibly a stomacher?) to create spectacular bling.
I love those things! They are the height of amazing! I bet Queen Mary had a dozen of them that are still tucked away somewhere.

My money is on that necklace -- which I think is just too big and gaudy -- being a personal gift from Charles. As I said, cattily, in another post, we all know how much he treasures Camilla's decolletage...
  #207  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:47 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,681
Default

That necklace reminds me of a couple of the Duchess of Windsor's pieces; there was one with amethysts and turquoise and a gold one studded with emeralds and rubies.
  #208  
Old 01-29-2007, 01:26 AM
Madame Royale's Avatar
Madame Royale Madame Royale is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,968
Default

A bit of cleavage last night aswell Keeping it sassy up top..good to see.

I don't know! I expect the Duchess to wear pieces that I think display an 'old world' charm because I think Camilla herself possesses a certain 'old world' character. Imposing and not without a touch of vulgarity which only royal women can justly display (or so I think).

Gaudy some have said? Without doubt. Imperiously impressive? Absolutely.

Successfully romancing the image of royalty, and what better place to do it than in the States?

Camilla does seem to hunch a little when she walks (only slight). This I've noticed for some time and her hair should be worked on but that's wishful thinking on my behalf.

Out of 10: 6 She has looked better imo.

(BTW: I think it would look spectacular as a tiara..I wonder if it is possible)

Last edited by Madame Royale; 01-29-2007 at 01:40 AM.
  #209  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:12 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Jo of Palatine Jo of Palatine is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirhon11234
I think the neckalce is too gaudy and over the top. But the brooch is very nice.
You're right, it's gaudy and a bit over the top. So it's just the thing to wear when you're "Visiting Royality" in the States. There were surely a lot of ladies present on that occassion who wore equally impressive jewellery as Philadelphia houses quite some rich families and they were surely thought to arrive in showing off-style.

Camilla couldn't know in advance what the other ladies would wear but she had to make sure to make the right impression. And remember the pics of the queen when she visited Philadelphia: she even wore a tiara which looked very much like a crown.

IMHO it was perfect for the occassion, for the place and the people she was going to meet.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
  #210  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:26 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Jo of Palatine Jo of Palatine is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avalon
At last the Royal Family has found someone, who can wear Queen Mary's jewels with a style!
I also look forward to the day when we see Camilla wearing Queen Mary's jewelery.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
  #211  
Old 01-29-2007, 07:09 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England and Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,694
Default

Camilla takes a shine to diamond necklace

The glittering necklace worn by the Duchess of Cornwall to a white-tie gala in Philadelphia on Saturday night was a gift while she was on an official overseas tour with the Prince of Wales, Clarence House said yesterday.

------------------

If you've got it flaunt it. I certainly wouldn't say no to the necklace!
__________________
The Past is the Past
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers
?
They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
  #212  
Old 01-29-2007, 08:41 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Jo of Palatine Jo of Palatine is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
From that article:

"She also wears a brooch in the shape of a fisherman’s fly given to the Queen Mother on her 100th birthday — although when its designer saw a news picture of the Duchess sporting it on her lapel, she noticed that it was being worn upside down."

Now one wonders who knows more about fisherman's flies - they are an extremely complicated topic, so I'm personally not sure if Camilla wore the brooch upside down or if the designer got it wrong in the first place.

As for borrowing Royal Jewels that Diana has previously worn: Camilla is a completely different type of lady to Diana - so why should she take these pieces when there are so many others? I guess we'll see Diana's jewels (her personal ones and the ones in Royal possession) again when either William or Harry present their wifes to the public - maybe along with a quote that "Mummy wanted these pieces to go to our brides" - to take the Diana-stigma off them.

BTW - does anyone else think like me that the wearing of that brooch from Queen Alexandra's possession (sporting the feasthers of the Prince of Wales), which so resembles Diana's was a bit of testing the waters? With what outcome? Any opinions?
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.

Last edited by Jo of Palatine; 01-29-2007 at 08:49 AM.
  #213  
Old 01-29-2007, 09:19 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,758
Default

The ruby necklace is definitely a gift from the Saudis or a Gulf emir. It's a very expensive piece that only the oil states would present.
  #214  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:05 PM
qui mal y pense qui mal y pense is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: spring valley, United States
Posts: 221
Default

That piece is very gaudy! as are the other diamond necklaces Camilla has worn so far. No pieces with real class. This necklace would probably suit Camilla much better as a Tiara and with a more "tasteful" gown.
I agree with Jo of Palatine that the Queen Alexandra brooch was worn to test the waters.
Any word of the provenance on that new brooch that Camilla wore? It looks like an art deco piece. Princess Michael has a similar one, which she got from the Duchess of Windsor.
  #215  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:19 PM
Avalon's Avatar
Avalon Avalon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to Avalon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qui mal y pense
That piece is very gaudy! as are the other diamond necklaces Camilla has worn so far. No pieces with real class. This necklace would probably suit Camilla much better as a Tiara and with a more "tasteful" gown.
I agree with Jo of Palatine that the Queen Alexandra brooch was worn to test the waters.
Any word of the provenance on that new brooch that Camilla wore? It looks like an art deco piece. Princess Michael has a similar one, which she got from the Duchess of Windsor.
The brooch was a gift to Queen Mother on her 100th birthday, as Jo points in post 212.

As for the Queen Alexandra brooch, personally I see no reason why she shouldn't wear it. Camilla is the Princess of Wales and has every right to wear it.
Just my opinion.
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen!
  #216  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:28 PM
qui mal y pense qui mal y pense is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: spring valley, United States
Posts: 221
Default

The brooch mentioned in the article as having been worn upside down cannot be the new one Camilla wore- that is obviously a heart with 2 dangling ornaments that I don't think can be worn any other way!
  #217  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:37 PM
milla Ca's Avatar
milla Ca milla Ca is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 1,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qui mal y pense
That piece is very gaudy! as are the other diamond necklaces Camilla has worn so far. No pieces with real class. This necklace would probably suit Camilla much better as a Tiara and with a more "tasteful" gown.
I agree with Jo of Palatine that the Queen Alexandra brooch was worn to test the waters.
Any word of the provenance on that new brooch that Camilla wore? It looks like an art deco piece. Princess Michael has a similar one, which she got from the Duchess of Windsor.
I want to ask you: What do you mean when you say Camillaīs necklaces are pieces without real class?
I think her jewels are very nice, many of them have an old history or they are love gifts. Real class enough, i think.
And what do you mean with a more tasteful gown? I think she looked stunning and she has a very good stylish taste!
And itīs not her style to wear deco pieces...Maybe we donīt speak about the same Duchess...?
__________________
īWe will all have to account for our actions to our children and grand-children, and if we donīt get this right, how will they ever forgive us?ī
Prince Charles in a speech, 6th December 2006
  #218  
Old 01-29-2007, 04:05 PM
qui mal y pense qui mal y pense is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: spring valley, United States
Posts: 221
Default

I am referrring to her diamond "snake" necklace and another one she has with a diamond "fringe". Very bling no style. Camilla does generally have very tasteful gowns but when one wears a necklace of that magnitude one does not need to supplement by making a statement with one's decolletage!
One does not need to wear deco pieces to have style, but when one simply wears lots of diamonds it does not mean they are automatically beautiful or tasteful.
  #219  
Old 01-29-2007, 04:08 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,758