The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Royal Highlights > Royal Jewels

Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 10-22-2005, 11:18 PM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
So what are the candidates for Camilla's first tiara?
__________________

__________________
  #102  
Old 10-22-2005, 11:37 PM
wymanda's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
So what are the candidates for Camilla's first tiara?
  1. Rundell
  2. Diamond Scroll
  3. Boucheron Honeycombe
  4. Surrey Fringe
  5. Marie Feodorovna "V"
  6. Teck Rose & Crescent
  7. Something New
Can we have a Poll please????????????????
__________________

__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #103  
Old 10-23-2005, 12:11 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 2,044
My guess would be that Camilla will be wearing a significant tiara befitting her role as the consort to the PofW. The queen would not do anything that would reflect negatively on the royal "firm" and will therefore make sure Camilla is presented as the important person she is. It is from now on irrelevant what anyone thinks of Camilla. She is the women Charles married and as such she is second only to QEII in the royal family. Besides I doubt Charles would let anyone or anything diminish the role of his wife.
grevinnan
__________________
  #104  
Old 10-23-2005, 03:12 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 86
Firstly, Camilla is not second, she is 4th, behind The Queen, The Princess Royal and Princess Alexandra. Secondly, I highly doubt The Queen will 'lend' Camilla anything. My guess is Charles has bought her something simple and elegant to reflect her unique position.

Quote:
Originally Posted by grevinnan
My guess would be that Camilla will be wearing a significant tiara befitting her role as the consort to the PofW. The queen would not do anything that would reflect negatively on the royal "firm" and will therefore make sure Camilla is presented as the important person she is. It is from now on irrelevant what anyone thinks of Camilla. She is the women Charles married and as such she is second only to QEII in the royal family. Besides I doubt Charles would let anyone or anything diminish the role of his wife.
grevinnan
__________________
  #105  
Old 10-23-2005, 04:34 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeap
Firstly, Camilla is not second, she is 4th, behind The Queen, The Princess Royal and Princess Alexandra. Secondly, I highly doubt The Queen will 'lend' Camilla anything. My guess is Charles has bought her something simple and elegant to reflect her unique position.
Without getting into another Order of Precedence debate, for the Official Order of Precendence Camilla, as the wife of the Prince of Wales, ranks straight after The Queen among females. In the Court Order of Precedence (ie HM's personal rankings) Camilla is indeed 4th.

My theory is Charles would have presented Camilla with a tiara on the day of their wedding.
.
__________________
  #106  
Old 10-23-2005, 04:57 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda
  1. Rundell
  2. Diamond Scroll
  3. Boucheron Honeycombe
  4. Surrey Fringe
  5. Marie Feodorovna "V"
  6. Teck Rose & Crescent
  7. Something New
Can we have a Poll please????????????????
Forget about a poll, can we have pics? :p
__________________
  #107  
Old 10-23-2005, 07:31 AM
wymanda's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,438
Boucheron Honeycombe - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92488
Queen Mary's Loop Tiara - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92490
Teck Rose & Crescent - http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=92491
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #108  
Old 10-23-2005, 09:21 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
I think Camilla probably will wear a new tiara.
__________________
  #109  
Old 10-23-2005, 09:50 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda
Thanks wymanda! Of the three, the Queen Mary's Loop is my favorite but I think the Teck Rose & Crescent will look better on her.
__________________
  #110  
Old 10-23-2005, 09:53 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
I think Camilla probably will wear a new tiara.
Hi branchg, I'm aware of the practice of buying a new tiara for a new royal but quite frankly it seems a bit couterproductive with all the criticism the BRF has gotten lately on being too extravagant. The BRF must have a lot of tiaras in its possession, this looks like a great opportunity to be a little cost conscious and pull something out that they already have.

With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
__________________
  #111  
Old 10-23-2005, 09:59 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
Oh! No! One can never have too many tiaras!
Why insult Camilla with some dusty, unwanted, unworn and forgotten cast off? No, something new and magnificant would be much better. :)
.
__________________
  #112  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:14 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
Oh! No! One can never have too many tiaras!
Why insult Camilla with some dusty, unwanted, unworn and forgotten cast off? No, something new and magnificant would be much better. :)
.
But then the rest of us never get to see these magnificent tiaras collecting dust! I mean if the royals are going to recycle clothes you'd at least think they'd want to recycle tiaras that cost a whole lot more! :)
__________________
  #113  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:40 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,843
Re:

Quote:
Of the three, the Queen Mary's Loop is my favorite but I think the Teck Rose & Crescent will look better on her.
I agree. I think that HRH deserves a new tiara - to signify a new beginning. But she'd look lovely in the Teck Rose and Crescent tiara. Only a few days to go before we'll see her in all her glitter! We'll also see any decorations she's been given.
__________________
  #114  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:16 AM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
A new Tiara would be nice. One that would be a signature Tiara for Camilla. But, I really would love to see the Teck Crescent tiara on her. That is a lovely tiara.
__________________
  #115  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:26 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
I'm amazed at how many of us think the Teck Crescent tiara would be the best for Camilla. We all have good taste!
__________________
  #116  
Old 10-23-2005, 02:47 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: los angeles, United States
Posts: 52
if the royal family were to buy a new tiara for the Duchess we would, most likely, never know. Since we have no idea how vast the collection truly is they can always report it as a family heirloom or just leave it ambiguous
__________________
  #117  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:36 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
Hi branchg, I'm aware of the practice of buying a new tiara for a new royal but quite frankly it seems a bit couterproductive with all the criticism the BRF has gotten lately on being too extravagant. The BRF must have a lot of tiaras in its possession, this looks like a great opportunity to be a little cost conscious and pull something out that they already have.

With its vast collection the BRF hardly needs any new tiaras.
Yes, but they could certainly dismantle some of the old tiaras in storage that are out-of-style and use the diamonds in a newly designed frame for Camilla. This has been done before.
__________________
  #118  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:38 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
I'm amazed at how many of us think the Teck Crescent tiara would be the best for Camilla. We all have good taste!
I guess I'm in the minority! I happen to think the Tech Crescent tiara is ugly and would not look good on Camilla. I don't think she will be wearing that one.
__________________
  #119  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:41 PM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,013
hmm...the teck tiara is smaller though. i doubt we'll see camilla wearing a big huge tiara for some years to come if ever.

i like the teck tiara but i don't think it will suit her hairstyle.
__________________
  #120  
Old 10-23-2005, 07:16 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,896
I'm still hoping the Rundell tiara will make a reappearance. They didn't break it up to make other stuff with, did they?
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, jewellery


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Duchess of Cornwall Jewellery 6: January 2008-September 2011 jcbcode99 Royal Jewels 689 08-31-2011 12:23 PM
Duchess of Cornwall Jewellery 5: November 2007 - February 2008 Warren Royal Jewels 203 02-02-2008 08:22 PM
Duchess of Cornwall Jewellery 4: February-November 2007 Warren Royal Jewels 198 11-13-2007 02:19 AM
Duchess of Cornwall Jewellery 3: Nov 2005 - Feb 2007 Warren Royal Jewels 288 02-04-2007 02:43 AM




Popular Tags
belgium birth brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland pregnancy president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess laurentien princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding william winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]