 |
|

11-14-2012, 08:14 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,057
|
|

We now understand while all the tiaras, necklaces, etc. are loans form the Queen (the crown) and not gifts to Camilla, Sophie, et al.
|

11-14-2012, 08:25 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS
We now understand while all the tiaras, necklaces, etc. are loans form the Queen (the crown) and not gifts to Camilla, Sophie, et al.
|
It is not because of any purported tax calculation, but essentially to keep the royal collection intact across generations.
|

11-14-2012, 04:55 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 3,114
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen
Why should she be remembered for jewels that aren't hers? Of all the things to be remembered for, jewels aren't high on the list.
|
Perhaps not. But this is a jewellery thread and many, many past royals have been rembered for their style as well as their substance.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

11-14-2012, 05:19 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The South, United States
Posts: 121
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckquinton
Dman, I agree with padams2359. Catherine is young, she has a very elegant neck but now is not the time to wear jewels. She must prove she deserve them
|
I'm sorry, but what does this mean? She has to prove she deserves them? In what way? She's the wife of the grandson of the Queen and will one day be Queen Consort herself. What else does she have to do to "deserve" to wear jewelry?
|

11-14-2012, 06:11 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 219
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
It is not because of any purported tax calculation, but essentially to keep the royal collection intact across generations.
|
Queen Alexandra and queen Mary divided their jewels between children.
|

11-14-2012, 07:43 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 80
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spheno
Queen Alexandra and queen Mary divided their jewels between children.
|
Yes, and look how many important, historical pieces have left the family because of it.
|

11-26-2012, 11:06 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,969
|
|
I wonder when Catherine will wear the Polar Bear brooch. I find it very pretty!
|

11-26-2012, 11:29 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 240
|
|
|
It´s realy pretty brooch. I would like see it on her.
|

11-27-2012, 04:15 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IloveCP
|
I suspect it will be at a Canada related event, or when she goes back to Canada.
|

12-09-2012, 09:07 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 251
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by martina
It´s realy pretty brooch. I would like see it on her.
|
It is very very pretty.
|

12-18-2012, 11:10 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chorzów, Poland
Posts: 292
|
|
Catherine hasn't worn her wedding earrings in public since wedding. Those are new earrings, first worn at that tour, you can view them in my album. I haven't been able to ID those so far.
Kate's UFO jewelry | Facebook
|

12-19-2012, 10:42 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chorzów, Poland
Posts: 292
|
|
|
That is my regret, that they cut Sophie from this article. I am huge fan of hers, and she has exact same earrings...
|

12-19-2012, 11:16 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,709
|
|
|
I know and i think Sophie was wearing them before Kate (although the first time Kate wore them was actually at the B Palace wedding dress exhibtion with the Queen in July 2010). I guess Sophie juss doesnt sell stories - but it is lovely to see this small business doing so well as a result
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

12-19-2012, 11:25 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,190
|
|
|
Its not that Sophie doesn't sell stories but the whole gist of the article is about the 'Kate Effect' and the phenomenon of jewellery and articles of clothing selling out almost instantly after Kate is spotted wearing them.
Like I posted in another thread, there just isn't any equivalent 'Sophie Effect'
__________________
|

12-19-2012, 11:30 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chorzów, Poland
Posts: 292
|
|
|
I agree BUT Daily Mail knew about Sophie, but dropped this part, they were going to mention me, anyway... It's the press that creates the Kate-effect, if they would cover Kate as poorely as Sophie, who would be aware of her?
I think they are using her the same as they did with Diana.
As for those earrings, I first saw them at Kate to the exhibit you mention, but it was 2011, not 2010. At Sophie in February/March 2012 during West Indies tour. But again, Sophie is so poorely covered that she might wore them sooner.
|

12-19-2012, 12:48 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 900
|
|
I still wish that Kate would wear some of her late mother-in-law's pearl earrings. They would look knock out.
|

01-04-2013, 01:14 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chorzów, Poland
Posts: 292
|
|
I finally managed to do great close ups of Catherine UFO jewellery from Diamond Jubilee Lunch that was back in April 2012.
Her brooch is in fact oak leaf with 3 acorns made of pearls. I would say it is bespoke piece symbolizing her coat of arms, 3 pearls (Kate, Pippa, James??), not sure. But I'm sure it was made for her.
Kate's UFO jewelry | Facebook
and earrings:
Kate's UFO jewelry | Facebook
She wore them only twice in 2010 and then on 2012.
|

01-04-2013, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 2,659
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by annaelfka
Her brooch is in fact oak leaf with 3 acorns made of pearls. I would say it is bespoke piece symbolizing her coat of arms, 3 pearls (Kate, Pippa, James??), not sure. But I'm sure it was made for her.
Kate's UFO jewelry | Facebook
|
If I remember right, around the period of the wedding when the Middleton coat of arms came to be know, it was stated that the acorns indeed stand for the Middleton's three children. I would wager its a bespoke piece too as it so closely resembles the Middleton's coat of arms.
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
― John Lennon
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
|
|
JennahPc
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|