the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Jewels




Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:20 PM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by auntie
Warren, does this mean that after the Queen passes away, the Tiaras/Jewels she permanently loaned to other members of the royal house stay with them (princess Anne, Countess of Wessex, Duchess of York etc.) or go back to the current monarch and consort?!
No, because the jewels were gifts from her own personal collection to her daughter and daughter-in-laws. They are not part of the Crown's collection.
  #182  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:45 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg
That's not true. The diadem hadn't been worn since 1947 and it was styled as a crown for Queen Mary's Durbar presentation as Empress of India. Obviously, it was sized and altered to fit Camilla as a tiara and is for her exclusive use.

It is a gift from the Queen to a future Consort, similar to Diana receiving the Lover's Knot Tiara before her wedding, as a symbol of their future role. Once Charles ascends the throne, the entire royal collection will be at Camilla's disposal to wear.

Obviously, no one ever expected a divorce to enter the royal picture for a Prince of Wales. Despite this development, Diana was allowed to retain Queen Mary's jewels for her lifetime use after the divorce. After her death, the tiara and emerald choker returned to the Queen.
I don't remember Diana ever wearing the diadem tiara. Are you implying she did or am I misunderstanding your wording? As far as I remember, Diana wore only two tiaras: the Lover's Knot and the Spencer. This tiara that Camilla worn recently was a tiara I had never seen before except in an official picture of Queen Mary consort of George V.
__________________
Chewster Castle * Peace & blessings * “... in the same way that landscape painters station themselves in the valleys in order to draw mountains... so it’s necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populus to know the nature of princes.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
  #183  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:49 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iowabelle
Wymanda, that's part of my point about it being ludicrous.

Camilla is here and she isn't going away. Charles isn't going to hide her away and I am sure that he wants her to have all the deference due to her as his wife (no matter what title is used to describe her).

As for the rules that apply to what jewelry she can wear, I can see that she might not be allowed to wear a crown if she isn't crowned queen. But for as for the tiaras used by other consorts, why shouldn't she be allowed to use them? (At least for Charles' lifetime.)

(And for what it's worth, I think Camilla has done a pretty good job so far. And Charles seems to have perked up since the marriage.)
I could not agree more! And I think the tiara looks great on her!
__________________
Chewster Castle * Peace & blessings * “... in the same way that landscape painters station themselves in the valleys in order to draw mountains... so it’s necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populus to know the nature of princes.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
  #184  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:49 PM
corazon's Avatar
corazon corazon is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 1,605
Default

diana have another tiara. Wait me a few minutes.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #185  
Old 10-26-2005, 06:55 PM
Lady Jean Lady Jean is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: _, United States
Posts: 482
Default

I'm with you - I think on Her Majesty's part it was disrespectful to lend a tiara identified solely w/Queen Mary to Camilla.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiaraprin
Her Majesty let her wear Queen Mary's Delhi Durbar tiara?? Queen Mary is rolling over in her grave!!
  #186  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:01 PM
corazon's Avatar
corazon corazon is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 1,605
Default

I posted photos of diana with another tiara in princess diana Jewelry
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #187  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:02 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Jean
I'm with you - I think on Her Majesty's part it was disrespectful to lend a tiara identified solely w/Queen Mary to Camilla.
But tiaras were meant to be worn. It would be a waste of a great work of art not to have it worn, and the wife of the Prince of Wales is a credible person for the honor. Of course, the Princess Royal or Countess of Wessex could also be, but I think it was lent to the Duchess of Cornwall to make a statement. The Queen's message through this action? I suppose she is trying to tell us that she and her family stand behind Camilla as Charles's wife and they consider her as the rightful future Queen Consort. Queen Mary was a Queen Consort, so only another Queen Consort or QC in the Waiting should wear this tiara. If Diana were alive and still married to Charles, I'd say it should be Diana to wear it, but this is not the case. It's Camilla, so this is appropriate, in my opinion.
__________________
Chewster Castle * Peace & blessings * “... in the same way that landscape painters station themselves in the valleys in order to draw mountains... so it’s necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populus to know the nature of princes.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
  #188  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:04 PM
seto seto is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: newyork, United States
Posts: 470
Default

Queen Mary left it to the Queen and she did what she wanted to with it. She gave it Charles's wife to wear. Which is who I believe is supposed to wear it the future kings wife. Someone do correct me if I am wrong.

Last edited by seto; 10-26-2005 at 07:08 PM.
  #189  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:11 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
I posted photos of diana with another tiara in princess diana Jewelry
Corazon, I appreciate this, but I did not find this other tiara you speak of. I looked in here: Diana, Princess of Wales, Jewellery, Part 2
Maybe there's some other thread I should have gone too? I thought you mean the Diana jewels thread, and this one seems to be about Diana jewels....
__________________
Chewster Castle * Peace & blessings * “... in the same way that landscape painters station themselves in the valleys in order to draw mountains... so it’s necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populus to know the nature of princes.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
  #190  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:11 PM
corazon's Avatar
corazon corazon is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 1,605
Default

yes, I posted in the part II
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #191  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:15 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
yes, I posted in the part II
yes, I saw the pics after that premature post! Sorry, but thank you very much!
__________________
Chewster Castle * Peace & blessings * “... in the same way that landscape painters station themselves in the valleys in order to draw mountains... so it’s necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populus to know the nature of princes.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
  #192  
Old 10-26-2005, 07:28 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is online now
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
Book Club Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,055
Default

This had better not start turning into yet another thread about Diana.

People who want to talk about Diana may do so in the threads about her. It's getting very tiresome seeing Camilla threads being constantly hijacked by people wanting to talk about Diana and post pictures of Diana. I'm going to start deleting them both here and in the British forum if this keeps up.

Since this thread is on its tenth page, I'm going to close it and start up another one. And it had better stay on topic.

The new thread is here:

Duchess of Cornwall jewellery part 2


Elspeth

Royal Forums administrator

Last edited by Elspeth; 10-26-2005 at 07:32 PM.
Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, jewellery


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall Fashion and Style A.C.C. Royal House of Fashion 188 07-25-2008 06:14 AM
The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 3: June-July 2005 Elspeth Current Events Archive 167 07-28-2005 11:30 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008
Jelsoft Enterprises
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0