 |
|

10-22-2012, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,202
|
|
Thanks to Gert-Jan who posted it on the Royal Jewels MB, here's an even closer pic of the 'new' tiara and haircomb.
Definitely no diamonds included, and what looks like black bead stones in a row on top are IMO half globes of steel cut in facets as well, if you look at the end of the row and at their back in the comb.
Definitely an antique set, perhaps only recovered/restored now, but most likely bought back or acquired recently:
Close up
http://s10.postimage.org/je7rwdq1l/Wed_Lux_9.jpg
|

10-22-2012, 11:59 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BROOKLYN, United States
Posts: 2,791
|
|
|

10-22-2012, 08:47 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 5,923
|
|

Very elegant. Absolutely love them.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

10-22-2012, 09:46 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 3,116
|
|
This tiara is very interesting but I think it would have looked better if it had been placed in front of a fabulous up do with the tiara highlighted against her dark hair. Worn this way it seemed a little cramped and up tight. Hmm
To be honest, I did not like the addition of the large diamond pendant on the necklace with this gown as it looked too heavy and choker-like which added to the overall cramped impression. Meh!
No, that dress (and that Princess) was made to carry the Napoleon Steel Cut tiara and I wish she had worn that. It fitted so perfectly. Beautiful
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

10-24-2012, 12:09 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sun Prairie, United States
Posts: 1,594
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by salma
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione
Are we sure it's cut steel? It doesn't look like it to me.
|
1) This looks more like a necklace-turned-tiara than a straight-up tiara to me. Was the steel-cut tiara part of a parure?
2) I'm not that familiar with the Steel-cut Tiara's details, but the top row of beads looks like hematite to me.
|

10-24-2012, 02:57 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 4,647
|
|
|
^^^Or even marquisite. I think this is too dainty a tiara for someone of Victoria's stature; she pulls off the grander tiaras beautifully.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

10-24-2012, 07:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,709
|
|
|
when i saw the new tiara i thought gift for the birth of the nest heir princess estelle most likely from her parents. Its an interesting tiara and one i could see estelle use as a starter tiara but i do prefer Victoria in something larger
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

10-24-2012, 07:27 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 582
|
|
|
I have to admit I do not get the idea of wearing a tiara with a comb. Somewhat weird I think. The tiara itself is nice though a bit too small.
|

10-24-2012, 08:41 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
Such fun trying to identify this fascinating tiara. Could the 'black bead stones' be garnets and might this be a Victorian era mourning tiara, with a view to the loss of Countess Alix de Lannoy?
|

10-25-2012, 09:18 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Evansville, Canada
Posts: 689
|
|
Other pieces that haven't been seen are lurking in those vaults too?
And we thought it was only the British Royals who guarded their treasures so tightly.  Wonder what else we haven't seen yet and when can we see it?
__________________
Recycle Life ~ Be An Organ Donor!!
Recieved my Kidney Transplant on December 10th, 1993 and will be forever grateful to the family of my donor for the greatest earliest Christmas Present I've ever been given
|

10-26-2012, 02:41 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: , Sweden
Posts: 8,878
|
|
i hope roger will write something in the kungliga magazinet edition about the tiara and comb.
maybe the pre-wedding earings victoria wore isnot bought back but taken out of the voults for the first time in many many yeras
but what do they gave in the voults
victorias 18th birthday tiara may be such a item, estelles first tiara may come from the hidden tresures
only time will tell and a book about the jewllery written with the help pf the royal family
does anyone have a better and larger photo of queen josefina
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...xKFOdOdMigGFa8
not a match to victorias tiara but it has been on my mind from the first time i saw victorias smal cut steel tiara
|

10-26-2012, 03:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,431
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josefine
|
Here is a larger version of Queen Josefine's portrait.
I agree, it does have a resemblance to Victoria's tiara. Not a perfect match but close.
|

10-26-2012, 01:41 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sun Prairie, United States
Posts: 1,594
|
|
|
Actually the comb doesn't surpise me. Many older parures (Napoleanic era?) have them because tiaras don't go all the way around the head. The comb in the back helps close the gap so to speak, or it is put higher in the updo to give the tiara more height visually. The "tiara" still looks like an upside down necklace to me though.
|

10-26-2012, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 4,647
|
|
|
So that's the Cut-Steel Tiara's little cousin, then.
__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
|

10-27-2012, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sun Prairie, United States
Posts: 1,594
|
|
|
If I had to choose between the two, I'd take the smaller one (even though it looks more like a necklace to me).
|

10-27-2012, 12:35 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,683
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
Here is a larger version of Queen Josefine's portrait.
I agree, it does have a resemblance to Victoria's tiara. Not a perfect match but close.
|
I'm not too fond of this one, but I can appreciate the historical significance and the Victorian touch to it. Great find, thanks for sharing!
|

10-27-2012, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,202
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia
Here is a larger version of Queen Josefine's portrait.
I agree, it does have a resemblance to Victoria's tiara. Not a perfect match but close.
|
It's certainly not the same.
There's some resemblance in design with the haircomb of the 'new' cut steel set, but this isn't surprising as the small tiara worn by young Josefina in the painting and the 'new' cut steel tiara should date back to approximately the same time period - of course not Victorian, but rather Napoleonic indeed.
|

11-01-2012, 02:47 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,976
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by salma
|
Not a fan of this tiara. I find it boring and I think the design is uninteresting.
|

11-08-2012, 01:23 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: different, Sweden
Posts: 58
|
|
|
I like the new tiara and especially the comb, but I do not think the tiara suits Victoria. I think she looks better with tiaras that are higher in the middle. Her face has a pronounced chin and a low sloping forehead and higher tiaras seems to balance it better. The other cut steel tiara looks just lovely on her.
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|