 |
|

01-01-2009, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ~, United States
Posts: 4,855
|
|
|
I love the ruby parure. I agree with Her_Majesty. When she first wore it, I too thought that the tiara looked too big. In the New Year's photos, it looks perfect, IMO. It gets better with age (if that is even possible)!
__________________
|

01-01-2009, 09:12 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,975
|
|
|
When she first wore it the frame showed and it made the large tiara seem to hover a bit--she styles her hair in such a way that the frame no longer shows. It's lovely.
I seem to the be in the minority on the earrings--I adore the large earrings. But, perhaps with the tiara and necklace it is a bit much. Any photos of Mary wearing just the earrings?
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

01-01-2009, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,956
|
|
|
I can only echo how much I love the rubies. I just adore the rich colour of those beautiful jewels. They make he rthe star of any event IMO.
|

01-01-2009, 09:50 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 2,486
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Her_Majesty
|
It is a quite impressive piece of jewelry! With or without earrings. However the ruby ones suit her to perfection.
__________________
|

01-02-2009, 03:26 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 2,098
|
|
|
They have now also covered the frame with hair in the same colour then Mary's. You can see it in Close-Ups from Joachim and Marie's Wedding
|

01-02-2009, 03:56 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,992
|
|
|
The frame has been covered for the past two or so years.
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

01-02-2009, 07:17 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator Picture of the Month Representative - Norway & Spain Royal Blogger
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bochum, Germany
Posts: 8,482
|
|
|
|

01-02-2009, 08:00 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
|
That would really be perfect. PMary looks radiant, even though this tiara is not my favorite ruby tiara she looks great in it and the rest of the rubies are really stunning!!
|

01-02-2009, 08:25 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,992
|
|
I think she'll look resplendent in the emerald parure, myself. The Desiree parure is by all means a magnificant display of craftmanship and HRH has worn it well these past years...the best still awaits however and to see her in Queen Margrethe's diamond floral aigrette (if "you" dont happen to think it to be an aigrette, that's fine, I do so lump it...  ) with diamond drop earrings, colliers and brooches adorned will be an absolute sight to behold.
Though I'm a firm believer in attire suiting jewellery and visa versa, so alot depends on what evening gown is worn with whichever item of jewellery.
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

01-02-2009, 09:11 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,466
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Royale
...to see her in Queen Margrethe's diamond floral aigrette
|
There's an excellent pic of the floral aigrette/tiara/bandeau at the bottom of this post, courtesy of Madame Royale.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

01-02-2009, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,975
|
|
|
That floral aigrette/tiara is really a lovely and interesting piece. Margarethe wears jewels so well, and is an elegant woman to be sure. But, I do wish that she would allow Mary a bit more access to other jewels. I love that ruby parue--it is beautiful--but she needs a more substantial diamond tiara than the one she received for her wedding. In my opinion, not that it means much at all, Mary should have been given the floral tiara as a wedding gift--it is more substantial and has a lovely history. However, at the time of her marriage to Frederik (May 2004) apparently Princess Alexandra and Prince Joachim were getting ready to call it quits and I can understand Margrethe being hesitant about giving a second family tiara away (in light of what had occured with the British Royals as well). Still, the tiara Mary received for her wedding is just so, well, dinky. It's lovely, but it's not exactly on the same level as the one Marie wears. I just think the Crown Princess should have a better diamond tiara than her sister-in-law.
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

01-02-2009, 03:27 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,543
|
|
|
You've certainly got a point,jcbcode99!But I still love this diamond/rubies tiara and I want to add that it seems brandnew,like a masterpiece that has been recently created by Cartier or something.I wonder how much they pay to keep it like that....
|

01-02-2009, 03:32 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,975
|
|
Oh, I completely agree about the diamond and ruby parue. It is breathtaking, and with her dark hair Mary looks nothing short of regal and exquisite and gorgeous in it.
For a very nice closeup you can go to the Royal Jewels of the World website:
Royal Jewels of the World Message Board
and the click on the first post of the thread that is called:
Princess Marie of Denmark tiara--this thread has closeups of Mary's ruby tiara, Marie's wedding tiara, and Margrethe's pearl and diamond tiara. And, they are detailed. You can see the settings of the rubies in Mary's tiara.
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

01-02-2009, 03:34 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,239
|
|
|
Her tiara looks definitely stunning.I really love it.
__________________
Everything we see in the world, is the creative work of woman.- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
|

01-02-2009, 05:53 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator Picture of the Month Representative - Norway & Spain Royal Blogger
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bochum, Germany
Posts: 8,482
|
|
|
|

01-03-2009, 11:05 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator Blog Editor Picture of the Month Representative - Denmark Royal Blogger
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,492
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99
Any photos of Mary wearing just the earrings?
|
The small version she wore while attending the International Fashion Fair in Copenhagen in 2008.
http://www.ppe-agency.com/500px/Feb2008/08020740.jpg
|

01-03-2009, 11:09 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
I'm not sure what the emerald parure looks like, have any pics? I think PMary would look stunning in emeralds also!
|

01-03-2009, 12:38 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,975
|
|
|
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

01-03-2009, 01:02 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 783
|
|
|
I think that the floral tiara Marie gets to use is much better than Mary's own diamond wedding tiara. However, Marie is much more girly than mary is. So I think that Tiara suits her well. And we must remember that the tiara is only a loan to Marie. She does not own it. The Queen does. Mary owns her diamond wedding tiara. and if somewhere down the road, God forbid, the marriage disolves, she will keep it. The ruby is a loan and belongs to the Crown Prince. It will stay with the marriage. Marie, to my knowlege does not have any jewels of her own that were given to her by her inlaws. But I would love to see Mary in another tiara. Even if only on certain occassions.
__________________
|

01-03-2009, 04:46 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99
|
WOW! That is something! It is a pity that Mary doesn't get to play more in the jewels. But the Prince has seen to it that she has a few nice pieces of her own. Lucky for the Dutch, even the lesser Royals get to get their hands on some of the really gorgeous pieces as long as they don't out do the Queen!!
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|