 |
|

06-23-2010, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union City, United States
Posts: 659
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EllieCat
Whatever the necklace is, and wherever it came from, it was lovely, and Sophie looked really lovely in it. i'd like to see her wear it again. At Prince Albert's wedding! With the aquamarine tiara.
|
Yes, please! Her aquamarine tiara is beautiful!
|

06-24-2010, 12:39 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,877
|
|
|
I now I am in the minority here, but I do think Sophie's weddding tiara is fine - not the prettiest, and not the ugliest. If its base could be "enhanced" with some more diamonds, it would make an interesting piece.
I also think the necklace could potentially now be on permanent loan to her, just like the Boucheron tiara is to Camilla. It is possible that Sophie has had this neckace for some time now and we have not seen it as she is often left out of the pictures of state banquets.
|

06-24-2010, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,953
|
|
|
I thought her wedding tiara waas lovely suited the gown she looked very nice.
|

06-24-2010, 03:07 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 1,903
|
|
|
Sophie's tiara is fine. She needs a hairdresser.
|

06-24-2010, 03:59 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 195
|
|
Quote:
|
Sophie's tiara is fine. She needs a hairdresser.
|
i agree she needed a hairdresser on Victoria's concert night, but at the Wedding, i thought her hair looked really good.
|

06-24-2010, 06:32 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,953
|
|
|
I think she has unfortunate hair but does the best she can with it IMO that is as good as it gets.
|

06-24-2010, 07:11 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
|
I don't mind Sophie's wedding tiara, it does need a base of diamonds but I think it fits her personality. It is better than P Mary's wedding tiara, and she's a Crown Princess.
Sophies aquamarines are stunning, I also hope to see them soon.
The necklaces are so similar....maybe the Queen had 2!(hehe)
|

06-25-2010, 04:56 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: salzburg, Austria
Posts: 379
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbarn67
|
What I simply do not understand - if they take such important historical pieces to make out a new tiara - why for heavens sake did they not build the new tiara in a more sophisticated way. It looks like if a child has put those together on a wire.....
|

06-25-2010, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 900
|
|
|
She seems to have a difficult time concealing the comb part.
|

06-25-2010, 08:35 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 1,903
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertie5252003
I think she has unfortunate hair but does the best she can with it IMO that is as good as it gets.
|
Don't be ridiculous. Hairdress can do wonders. She seems to lack one. Just looks like a mess she does herself.
|

06-26-2010, 12:15 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Omaha, United States
Posts: 1,587
|
|
Sophie's wedding tiara is horrible, I like the aquamarine tiara/necklace much better. Mary's ruby parure tiara is much, much better.
|

06-26-2010, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,953
|
|
|
Actually Countess I was attempting to say that Sophie no matter how hard a hairdresser may try Sophie has horrible hair was I too subtle for you? I will try and state the obvious next time ....
|

06-27-2010, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,665
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
I now I am in the minority here, but I do think Sophie's weddding tiara is fine - not the prettiest, and not the ugliest.
|
Then I'm in the minority too.  It looks pretty, a bit medieval, but that's exactly the charm of this piece IMO. I also want to thank you all for providing precious info about the necklace she wore at Victoria's wedding. I liked it a lot. Her earrings were nice too.
__________________
Les Connaisseurs.
|

06-27-2010, 12:12 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: around the uk, United Kingdom
Posts: 198
|
|
I think Sophie may have hair like mine, lots of it but very fine. When worn down no amount of hairspray etc can keep it looking good if there is a bit of breeze. About the aquamarine tiara and the necklace already discussed, the BRF have a large "pool" of jewelry which is not always seen on public occasions. It could be that the tiara is from this.
For anyone interested in tiaras there is a brilliant book by Geofrey Munn called" Tiaras a history of splendour" .
|

06-27-2010, 05:00 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 1,903
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertie5252003
Actually Countess I was attempting to say that Sophie no matter how hard a hairdresser may try Sophie has horrible hair was I too subtle for you? I will try and state the obvious next time ....
|
Nonsense. People with baby fine hair can have hairdos that work well for them. I have baby fine hair, but always have a good hairdresser. I am sure the very best are available to her.
|

06-27-2010, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katrianna
Sophie's wedding tiara is horrible, I like the aquamarine tiara/necklace much better. Mary's ruby parure tiara is much, much better.
|
I wasn't referring to her ruby parure!  Which I agree is superb, but her wedding tiara which is a little small IMO!
|

06-28-2010, 12:02 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Omaha, United States
Posts: 1,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubies
I wasn't referring to her ruby parure!  Which I agree is superb, but her wedding tiara which is a little small IMO!
|
My apologies I read your post too fast and misunderstood.
|

06-28-2010, 04:36 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,877
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubies
I wasn't referring to her ruby parure!  Which I agree is superb, but her wedding tiara which is a little small IMO!
|
I think the wedding tiara is not small, given Sophie's relative position in the BRF. As previously pointed out, her tiara has a lot more bling that the one that Princess Mary of Denmark has. Again as previously posted, a base would make Sophie's tiara much more substantial.
|

06-28-2010, 06:08 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: pomona, Australia
Posts: 528
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by countess felicitas
What I simply do not understand - if they take such important historical pieces to make out a new tiara - why for heavens sake did they not build the new tiara in a more sophisticated way. It looks like if a child has put those together on a wire.....
|
Such a relief that someone also sees the tiara this way
|

07-03-2010, 10:51 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ., United States
Posts: 43
|
|
Does anyone have a close-up of Sophie's necklace and pin in this photo?
Visit to Jersey
http://i47.tinypic.com/25iuh3d.jpg
credit: iceflower
Any help would be appreciated!
Lady Karen
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|