![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
From flandersnews.be:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Source:
flandersnews.be - King does not consult any women Just old-school, if you ask me [or he didn't do it on purpose]. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good grief, they are really looking for something to critisize the King about, aren't they? I don't think any sexist ideas are behind this, it is just that he is consulting the most senior former politicians, ministers of state etc. and they all happen to be male.
__________________
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, there also was a long article about this issue in today’s Het Laatste Nieuws (best selling Belgian newspaper). Some female ministers of state are seriously annoyed but the same goes for some of their male colleagues, who also unsuccessfully awaited a phonecall of the palace. But the HLN article also points out that the “old-school” behaviour of the king (who employs some women in key positions btw), just reflects the general situation of women in Belgium’s political scene. Twelve persons gathered around the table to hold the coalition talks, just two of them are female. And one of them, Joelle Milquet, has been labelled as “Madame Non”, who is responsible for the failure of the talks so far. Many think a male politician claiming his position would have been treated much softer. And besides Joelle Milquet there are no women holding key positions in the bigger Belgian parties. Sadly enough this is a general problem – not only in Belgium.
But the consultation of the ministers of state was also a manoeuvre to gain time and to allow the coalition partners to calm down and to sort things out behind closed doors. The appointment of Mr van Rompuy as scout last Wednesday marks a turning point. For the first time the palace was able to spread the news before some indiscrete (and destructive) politicians could comment on it. Seems they finally realize that their indiscreetness damages the head of state and his small room for manoeuvre. In the end it are the politicians who have to find a way to work together and form a solid government, not the king – so it´s about time for them to come to senses and stop this Kindergarten way to get things done IMVHO. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dutch newspaper ´Teklegraaf´ has an interesting interview with Louis Tobback, mayor of Leuven. He says that although he is a republican in principle, he knows that Belgium can not exsist without a King. Who would be head of state otherwise? A Walloon, a Flemish? The Belgians need the King as much as they need bread.
He has some critisism on the Kings role, according to Tobback the King allowed himself to get used by Yves Leterme and Didier Reynders respectiveluy, after they didn´t succeed in starting their Orange/Blue coalition. The King gave the impression that he wasn´t impartial and that damaged the monarchy.
__________________
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Magazine Humo had this article about the King witgh this charming cover. The cover says ´The power of the King and ´The End of the Monarchy?´.
Humo did a commercial on the radio for this issue but it was refused by the VRT, the Flemish public station as they took some words spoken by the king and cut them in a way to make him say things that fit the commercial.
__________________
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
An interesting article about the state of Belgium from Expatica.com:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
And in the mean time Mr van Rompuy is busy:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, dear members, this is just one of those situations where the King can do nothing right. Here Belgium is a very successful country-at least seems to be to this outsider-and what are they doing, hell bent on committing suicide. Political hara-kiri. Has happened so many many times. The American Civil War is a classic example. Passion, egotism and stupidity trump common sense. And the unfortunate Albert II is caught in the middle of all of this.l
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
To show the heated state of the debate:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Monday September 10th the leader of Vlaams Belang, Filip Dewinter, asked his colleagues in the Flemish Parliament "No more begging, no more entreating, but act! Make an own charter for the Flemish autonomy and ask the Flemish people about it in a referendum. You have the historic duty to make a nation of our own people and grant them their own Flemish state!"
"Because it suited Britain and France to have a new, neutral state instead of the economical powerful and rivalling Netherlands, they supported a break-up of the United Netherlands. Since then rancour is ever-present and Belgium has become a freak of nature, a state in which power is so devolved that government is an abhorred vacuum. In short, Belgium has served its purpose. An euthanasia on the country is in order." "Belgians need not feel too sad. Countries come and go. And perhaps a way can be found to keep the king, if he is still wanted anyway. Since he has never had a country—he has always just been King of the Belgians—he will not miss Belgium." The other parties, except for the small nationalistic and separatistic fractions, did not support the idea of a referendum on Flemish independence but could not filibuster the debate (the Vlaams Belang is too big). |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
WOW!
I had no idea any of this was going on! I guess I have to start getting my royal news here at TRF. I admit I don't know anything about the European political systems/processes. It shouldn't be that difficult . Has anything been said about whether King Albert II has consulted his heir (can't think of who that is at the moment) or any other members of his family? Sometimes a differnt/younger perspective helps. Or he can just toss the whole government out and take over absolute rule until they get their act togethor!![]() ![]() |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I don´t recall if anything is said on the involvement of the crownprince, but this is certainly a job for the King himself, the crownprince is not one of his advisors.
Albert II and absolute rule, somehow I don´t picture those two together. I think Albert would prefer to get a pint somewhere and let the politicians solve it all, if he could .Here an article from the economist about the Belgian situation: Quote:
This weeks issue is talking about the ´Praline Divorce´, but the article isn´t online yet.
__________________
|
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
But it could become the Crown Prince's problem, or he could encounter a similar problem during his reign. It wouldn't hurt to have a little experience in the area.
If Albert isn't keen on ruling his country, and the governmental parties aren't keen on cooperating to rule the country, maybe that article is right. Maybe Belgium should "divorce" and go their seperate ways. |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
I meant that he isn't keen on absolute rule, as you suggested. I assume that the present situation does put some big pressure on him, but he will not walk away from his duty for sure.
I think this time the parties will all make amends but the problem is that these crisises are getting worse each election, so maybe in one or two decades..?
__________________
|
|
#39
|
|
|