The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > Imperial Family of Japan > Japanese Royal History

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 09-05-2006, 10:53 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Irvine, United States
Posts: 30
what would have happened if the emperor was dethroned after WWII?

what would have happened if the emperor was kicked out after WWII?

were there ever any debates about keeping or abolishing the emperor?
(either among the Japanese people or the US military/govt)

thanks!
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:19 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,897
I think it might have been much easier for Japan to follow so many of the other countries of southeast Asia into Communism. I gather the Chinese were trying to orchestrate a Communist takeover of the Japanese government; the strong feelings of many Japanese in favour of their Emperor may have been part of why the takeover wasn't successful.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2006, 06:50 PM
EmpressRouge's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,294
Hirohito was not tried for war crimes, and the Japanese were allowed to keep their emperor but there were conditions the most significant of which was a declaration that he was no longer divine. Even that drove some Japanese to suicide.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2006, 08:05 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,897
Elizabeth Gray Vining's book about her time as tutor to the current emperor when he was a boy talks about the conditions in Japan in the immediate postwar period, and it sounded absolutely dire. That sort of deprivation and societal breakdown are often precursors to anarchy or revolution. I'm sure the existence of the imperial family was a stabilising influence even with the occupation-imposed changes to their scope and size.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2006, 08:30 PM
Toledo's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Spain, residing in the USA, United States
Posts: 1,522
That sounds like a great topic for one of those alternate history fiction books. My wild guess is that life would be just like it is now...minus one monarch.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2006, 09:38 PM
Mandy's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 6,927
Because the emperor was highly revered in Japan, the USA kept Hirohito as a figurehead to control the masses and prevent anarchy. I doubt very much that Japan would be just another country minus one monarch. As you see, Britain demanded that Hiroito be tried for war crimes, but the USA refused knowing full well the dangers involved in prosecuting an emperor since emperors had been revered like gods for centuries. It would have ensured the occupation's failure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2006, 10:07 PM
Lady Jennifer's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Down the street. It's the third house on the right, United States
Posts: 7,672
This is an interesting topic. Gotta love the "what if" questions in life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandy
As you see, Britain demanded that Hiroito be tried for war crimes, but the USA refused knowing full well the dangers involved in prosecuting an emperor since emperors had been revered like gods for centuries. It would have ensured the occupation's failure.
Its good to see that they thought ahead & knew something like that could possibly happen. I guess in a way they thought it might cause another Hitler- like figure to rise to power if they had removed the Emperor?
__________________
"Life is a succession of moments. To live each one is to succeed." - Corita Kent
Live, Highlander. Grow stronger. Fight another day. Highlander: The Series

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2006, 11:35 PM
Royal Highness
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1,734
I, for one, doesn't like the words "kicked out" for a serious history thread. And of course, you know that I'm against Republics in general , so I think that the best of all things is always conserve the Monarchs, who are the symbol of the historical and cultural roots of a Nation.

I agree that without an Emperor, Japan could have been quite easily pushed to Communism, or at least to a social war, which is always dangerous.

But again...Only Japanese could decide which kind og governement they wants to have and which rules should rule them. I think that no country (nor coalition of countries) must have any right to decide any political internal issue of a foreign State. "Progress" and "correct political ways" spread too much blood in our poor little world.

Vanesa.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2008, 06:32 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 7
It was the Supreme allied Commander General Douglas MacArther that saved the emperor,that way he knew he would get better cooperation from there people.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-08-2008, 09:08 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, United States
Posts: 2,324
How old was The Emperors son if he had Abdicated
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-08-2008, 09:30 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,897
Prince Akihito was born in 1933, so he would have been around 13.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-09-2008, 12:15 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, United States
Posts: 2,324
Would he have needed a Regent
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-09-2008, 02:47 PM
kimebear's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Albany, United States
Posts: 1,382
Most certainly.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-09-2008, 03:09 PM
Parrothead's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 226
Very interesting question. I agree with Elspeth, I think the removal of the Emperor could have led to Japan becoming a communist ruled country. If that had happened it makes one think about how different our entire global economy could have been.

How seriously was his removal considered by the U.S. government...this is outside my area of knowledge. I'm sure many of the documents surrounding that conversation are still under lock & key and may never be released to be studied. I wonder if Truman decided that it would serve no purpose for an outside government (the U.S.) to remove a monarch from his throne, that it was up to the country in question to decide. Very interesting topic!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-09-2008, 04:10 PM
Thomas Parkman's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 531
Well, dear members, if my memory serves me, the matter was quite hotly debated inside the highest levels of the US government as well. However there is one point which the noble members have not considered. Germany. I think a decisive factor was what happened to Germany after the abolition of the monarchy. Kaiser Bill fled to Holland and all the rest of it. The socialist dominated republic that took the place of the monarchy was profoundly hated by the right in Germany. Which led to thugs like Hitler and company be able to manuver their way into power, with the acquiescence at a crucial moment of a senile Paul von Hindenburg.

So how much more sensible would have been a Germany without all of the humiliations of the Treaty of Versailles with a Kaiser Bill or one of his grandsons on the throne as a ceremonial head of state and very limited political powers as a reminder of the risks of taking on the whole world on the battlefield. It took the good Germans to make the mistake twice to hopefully learn the lesson of the follies of milirarism and the glorification of war. How much better would the world have been without a WWII???
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-12-2008, 10:12 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: brisbane, Australia
Posts: 509
The results of what happened in Germany were taken into serious consideration when the US decided the future of Japan. They truelly had learnt from the past at that stage.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-18-2008, 11:53 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Irvine, United States
Posts: 30
allowing the Japanese emperor to remain probably ensured the succesful
occupation of Japan after WWII.

on the other hand, I wonder how this affected the Korean war...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-19-2008, 12:56 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 7
Looking at Japan today it makes you wonder who won the war.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-07-2008, 08:39 PM
Thomas Parkman's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 531
Lok what is happening in Afghanistan. The majority of of Loya Jirga appearently wanted to restore the king but the Americans would not have it. A symbol and connection with a saner and happier past was not restored, to, I believe the countries great cost. Cheers.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-16-2008, 02:56 PM
Shaiya's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 151
Having monarchies(even constitutional) don't always make countries a more stable place.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
emperor hirohito, emperor showa, history, japanese imperial family, japanese royal family


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What did the monarchs & royals do during WWI & WWII? KikkiB Royalty Past, Present, and Future 43 03-12-2013 12:17 PM
What happened to Rania's empowerment of women? shah reza King Abdullah and Queen Rania and Family 120 08-09-2005 08:54 PM
What Has Happened To The Mathilde And Jeweler karolinabraganza King Philippe & Queen Mathilde and Family 2 12-12-2003 01:05 PM




Popular Tags
abdication belgium birth brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jewellery jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman pieter van vollenhoven president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess mabel princess margriet princess mary princess mary fashion queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]