BeatrixFan
Majesty , Royal Blogger, TRF Author
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2005
- Messages
- 6,861
- City
- London
- Country
- United Kingdom
Well I haven't seen it in The Times and I've had one delivered every day for the past 2 years.
Excitable royal gossips last week suggested that bone cancer was the real reason behind the Queen’s bad back, but palace officials are snorting at this idea.
Elspeth said:Considering how long this alleged strained muscle has been a problem, it's not surprising that this sort of rumour would surface. The only surprise is that it's taken this long. I suppose we'll have to wait for developments - the first being whether the Queen misses the Opening of Parliament this week.
timtonruben359 said:We have to remember that the Queen is 80. Her back is going to take time to heal. But I am hoping it is nothing more serious. I was actually suprised at how frail the Queen sounded at the New Zealand war memorial.
That being said, if the Queen doesn't attend the Opening of Parliament, I'm going to assume her condition is worse than we thought. (while I don't believe she is terminally ill, I am wondering if this is something more than just a strained back).
Elise27 said:While i dont believe the palace is very forthcoming with these type of things, i do think that the queens slurred and slow speech on sat was due to heavy medication. there's other reasons why people would start speaking like that such as strokes.
In any case my respect for her has grown immensely because anyone else in her situation would not continue working, one can really tell that this is a determined and devoted woman and her country should be grateful they have her as queen.
The ritual also suggests that while prime ministers might come and go, somehow there will always be an England, replete with horse-drawn carriage, crown and throne, and a little tension between those who think a monarchy is outdated and those wedded to the tradition.