So the £250,000 isn't a quantified figure, but a guestimate by a source? Does the amount include one-time hard costs, such as security camera/alarm that don't need to be changed every year?
This is the sort of whipped up outrage I am callling into question. It just seems incredible that if the stories were about William and Harry, more people tend to question a source such as The Daily Mail. Yet, if the stories were about the Yorks, they were taken at face value as honest journalism.
For all the posts upset about my observation on Sarah, I never said she was always slim and stylish. She had her ups and downs. When she looked really good, the press still picks out the worst shot of her to put on the front page.
This is the sort of whipped up outrage I am callling into question. It just seems incredible that if the stories were about William and Harry, more people tend to question a source such as The Daily Mail. Yet, if the stories were about the Yorks, they were taken at face value as honest journalism.
For all the posts upset about my observation on Sarah, I never said she was always slim and stylish. She had her ups and downs. When she looked really good, the press still picks out the worst shot of her to put on the front page.