Prince William and Kate Middleton Current Events 5: June-August 2008


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's incredible she never look at the cameras, it is really incredible how can she do that all the time, she never speaks to anyone, she never look at any camera!!! She is amazing yes she is, I think she is the first celebrity girlfriend with this kind of atitude!:ermm:
 
biboquinhas said:
SNIPPED....I think she is the first celebrity girlfriend with this kind of attitude!:ermm:
Click to expand...
Perhaps because she doesn't see herself as a 'celebrity', merely a girlfriend. :flowers:
 
Last edited:
Yes, I think so. She's certainly friendly with people she's meeting or spending time with, but she doesn't play to the cameras. It's one of the things that I like about her.

Skydragon said:
perhaps because she doesn't see herself as a 'celebrity', merely a girlfriend. :flowers:
Click to expand...
 
Mermaid1962 said:
Yes, I think so. She's certainly friendly with people she's meeting or spending time with, but she doesn't play to the cameras. It's one of the things that I like about her.
Click to expand...

I've heard the viewpoint that Kate just wants attention and I've never understood that either. She seems like a fairly private person.
 
Kate Middleton attended her second royal wedding of the year without Prince William.
Lady Rose Windsor, who is a relation of the Queen, married George Gilman at the historic Queen's chapel, near St James's Palace in central London.
Miss Middleton arrived at the ceremony with two girls, wearing a knee-length satin dress, a duck-egg blue jacket and a black fascinator.
Click to expand...

The Press Association: Kate Middleton at royal wedding
 
:previous:
Not meaning to sound sarcastic but she probably attended because she was invited. Or do you mean why wasn't William there? He is on duty with the Navy. In the Caribbean (I think).
 
Last edited:
Amelia said:
:previous:
Not meaning to sound sarcastic but she probably attended because she was invited. Or do you mean why wasn't William there? He is on duty with the Navy.
Click to expand...

Thank you Amelia. I was asking why William wasn't there. I figured Kate would know better than to show up to a wedding she wasn't invited to.:flowers:
 
Isana said:
Some more pictures at the DM inlcuding Princess Anne and Autumn and Peter.

Kate Middleton legs it at second Royal wedding without her Prince | Mail Online
Click to expand...

Thanks for the pictures and article, Isana :)
The Duke of Gloucester's children are really good-looking and Lady Rose looked so elegant. Beautiful bride.
Also Gabrella's jacket gives a classy, yet young look to her outfit. Grey can really be lifted using different textures, and the pink hat added the finishing touches.
I have yet to see someone look good in those strange feathery things that sit on the side of one's head, awful!
Kate has got to get rid of that white jacket, or at least wear it with an appropriate outfit. She looks much better with colour.

Oops :groan:, just found out it was a pale blue jacket [have had a word with my computer to get its act together], but still feel the same way about the jacket.
 
Last edited:
Mermaid1962 said:
That girl has Poise with a capital "P"!:)
Click to expand...
IMO, Catherine looked fantastic, with the little blue jacket picking up the theme of the dress. As you say, such poise to ignore the skirt being blown up in the air.:flowers:
 
Agree. I think she's fantastic. She'll make a lovely addition to William's family.:)
 
It looks like she is wearing the same hat she has used in the last royal wedding she attended! The outfit is different but the hat look the same!
 
I don't think so. At Peter's wedding she wore a different hat that had a some net in front of her face. This looks a little like what Chelsy wore to Peter's wedding though.
 
Last edited:
I think she looked great at the wedding yesterday! She's always elegant, stylish, and sophisticated. Not that I've ever seen her looking bad. She looks just as good in a cable knit sweater and jeans.
 
^It was ok, but not one of her better looks, imo. Though one thing (her legs) were looking great!! She just has great legs, period. Her legs are probably her best body feature, with her hair being second, or vice versa, I can't decide. But the jacket looked so tight.
 
I actually thought the jacket wasn't fitted enough :lol: But I will agree with you about her legs, guess that bike riding pays off. I do wish that she had worn her hair up for once though.
 
Mermaid1962 said:
That girl has Poise with a capital "P"!:) And isn't Anne wearing the same dress that she wore to Charles and Diana's wedding 27 years ago?:ermm:
Click to expand...

From the article:

"Lady Rose, who became plain Mrs Gilman yesterday, is the great-granddaughter of George V and is 23rd in line to the throne."

I thought that Duke's daughters keep their style of "Lady" after marriage to a commoner? So she is now Lady Rose Gilman, isn't she?
 
Jo of Palatine said:
I thought that Duke's daughters keep their style of "Lady" after marriage to a commoner? So she is now Lady Rose Gilman, isn't she?
Click to expand...
They do indeed, so she is Lady Rose Gilman.:flowers:
 
Maybe I'm extrapolating too much here, but if William and Kate were not serious and I mean *serious*, would she attend two royal weddings on his behalf? Granted they weren't the weddings of senior royals, but they are still members of the family. If I were not extremely extremely serious with someone, I wouldn't let them attend a family wedding in my stead, as that would be rather odd, I would think.


I'm not saying an engagement is forthcoming, just that perhaps these two are much more serious than we originally thought. If they weren't, why would she go? It's not like she's close personal friends with any of them and would have attended anyway.
 
goodness it really annoys me when articles in the papers can not get the facts right - "plain mrs gilman" i dont think so Lady Rose Gilman now

We dont know for certain that either William or Harry would have attended Rose's wedding if they has been in the UK neither attended the weddings of the Earl of Ulster or Lady Davina. Maybe through William Kate has got friendly with Rose and George as they are quite similiar in age (Rose is 28 and both George and Kate are 26)
 
Last edited:
I tend to agree with Sister Morphine, however,PrincessofEurope you are right Lady Rose's, Mr. Gilman's, and Kate's close to same and Kate may have became friends because she was William g/f.
 
Do we have any idea of who the 2 girls were she arrived with?

Are the Duke and Duchess friendly with Charles and Camilla - the children might have socialised at Highgrove away from the public eye over the years.
 
Interview with Belle Robinson co-founder of Jigsaw:
"I'm amazed at how much people have made of a very simple thing. I don't know Kate well. Some people asked us if we were happy for Kate and William to go and stay in our holiday house in Mustique with some friends. They're not allowed to pay for it but in return they would make a donation to the local hospital. And I said: 'Yeah, fine.'
Click to expand...

Kate's not precious. She mucked in at Jigsaw| Showbiz | This is London
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

iceflower
Prince Albert & Princess Charlene Current Events Part 6: January 2024 -
Replies
8
Views
3K
iceflower
iceflower
iceflower
King Frederik X, Current Events Part 1: January 2024 -
2 3
Replies
64
Views
8K
polyesco
P
iceflower
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Crown Prince Frederik, Current Events Part 9: June 2023 - January 2024
2 3
Replies
66
Views
13K
polyesco
P
An Ard Ri
  • Sticky
Prince Daniel's Current Events, Part 4
Replies
15
Views
2K
LadyFinn
LadyFinn
Hans-Rickard
Crown Prince Christian, News and Current Events Part 1: January 2024 -
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Izzie
Izzie

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom