HMQueenElizabethII
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2004
- Messages
- 3,773
- City
- Ryde
- Country
- Australia
Later today TRH will attend a Reception at the Queen's Gallery.
Lyonnaise said:Polfoto 14-04-2005 Britain's Prince Charles, right, and Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall shelter under umbrellas as they open a new play park in Ballater,Scotland Thursday April 14, 2005 . It was the first official duty for the honeymooning couple since their wedding last Saturday. (AP Photo/David Cheskin, Pool)
Australis said:Gee sorry about saying this but she is soooo un-atractive woman!!! she looks like a man with a wig, her hair is a mess, the laughter so exagerated, no pose, no gentleness, she does not look femenine at all!!!. Even her standing up seems so masculine. I think you do not have to go to princess school to exercise just a bit of common sense and stand up more graciously with the legs and feet closer, show a bit of gentleness and smile more naturally. My opinion of course
carlota said:THEY INAGURATED THE CUBE
don't they look lovely together? there is some kind of special glow in camilla's face since the wedding... i'm soooo happy for them. they really seem to be happy.
also, camilla looked gorgeous in black today...
I don't know much about many Europe's crownprincesses in the past time (and also in the future), but in the present time indeed that she seems to be the worst looking crown princess in Europe (sorry .....) compared to Letizia, Maxima, Mathilde,Mary, Mete marit.bigheadshirmp said:worst looking crown princess in europe ever!
Australis said:Gee sorry about saying this but she is soooo un-atractive woman!!! she looks like a man with a wig, her hair is a mess, the laughter so exagerated, no pose, no gentleness, she does not look femenine at all!!!. Even her standing up seems so masculine. I think you do not have to go to princess school to exercise just a bit of common sense and stand up more graciously with the legs and feet closer, show a bit of gentleness and smile more naturally. My opinion of course
couldn't agree more with what u said...just....really really not attractive at all....
worst looking crown princess in europe ever!
galuhcandrakirana said:I don't know much ... she seems to be the worst looking crown princess in Europe .
galuhcandrakirana said:I don't know much about many Europe's crownprincesses in the past time (and also in the future), but in the present time indeed that she seems to be the worst looking crown princess in Europe (sorry .....) compared to Letizia, Maxima, Mathilde,Mary, Mete marit.
Elspeth said:Well, given that she's old enough to be their mother, that's hardly surprising. I don't suppose some of these others will be exactly renowned beauties as they approach their 60th birthdays.
Anita said:With all the respect and admiration I have for Camilla, I though have to say that I don't totally agree with what you've said . All the young princesses may not be as beautiful when older as today (although I have never considered Mary or Maxima as beautiful women) , but they will certainly be prettier than Camilla . Camilla was never a beauty, unlike some of these princesses . So there is a continuity in her looks, and there will probably also be a continuity in the looks of the young princesses .
Elspeth said:Oh, yes, I'm sure there will. However, when a person has lived a relatively private life until her mid-fifties, she's going to have a different style of dress and makeup etc from someone who's been "princessing" since she was 20 or 30. Camilla grew up in the immediate postwar era in England, when the overall standard of living was lower and the whole outlook was different. Most of the current crop of European princesses are products of the 1960s and 1070s, when western Europe was stable and prosperous when they were growing up, as was Australia and (for someone in Princess Maxima's class) South America. Camilla has also lived an outdoor life, not a life where she's been pampered and cossetted, and she's the mother of adult children. She's also not going to be wearing fashionable clothes like the young princesses; she might be better compared with the sixty-something queens like Sonja, Silvia, and Paola, who, while elegant and attractive, don't make headlines for fashion and beauty these days (and would probably not do themselves any favours by trying to do so). It takes someone special like Princess Marina to still be a fashion icon and genuine beauty in middle age.
I know that even with all the advantages of grooming and designer wear, Camilla would never be a beauty queen, but it's still a little unfair to compare a woman approaching 60 with ones who are in their 30s.
Elspeth said:Oh, yes, I'm sure there will. However, when a person has lived a relatively private life until her mid-fifties, she's going to have a different style of dress and makeup etc from someone who's been "princessing" since she was 20 or 30. Camilla grew up in the immediate postwar era in England, when the overall standard of living was lower and the whole outlook was different. Most of the current crop of European princesses are products of the 1960s and 1070s, when western Europe was stable and prosperous when they were growing up, as was Australia and (for someone in Princess Maxima's class) South America. Camilla has also lived an outdoor life, not a life where she's been pampered and cossetted, and she's the mother of adult children. She's also not going to be wearing fashionable clothes like the young princesses; she might be better compared with the sixty-something queens like Sonja, Silvia, and Paola, who, while elegant and attractive, don't make headlines for fashion and beauty these days (and would probably not do themselves any favours by trying to do so). It takes someone special like Princess Marina to still be a fashion icon and genuine beauty in middle age.
I know that even with all the advantages of grooming and designer wear, Camilla would never be a beauty queen, but it's still a little unfair to compare a woman approaching 60 with ones who are in their 30s.
susan alicia said:camilla's standard of living immediate postwar was never lower, she grew up in a family that gave her a trustfund of 100000 (can not remember how many zero's).
Her priorities were just different, she is healthy but looks like she has never excercised her upper arms in particular for instance in order to keep a bit of muscle tone, she just has played a bit of tennis etc. She might not even have bothered too much with a moisturiser. She is a typical woman of her background.
That what I meant actualy, but sorry I didn't make it clear enough, if she has compared with other crown princesses at this present time then of course her looking incomparable with theirs, with one of the reason is because of their diferences of age. I just gave a comment to what the post I quoted has said, and of course it is not make sense to compare her with others who much younger. Sorry for this misunderstanding, I had wrote my post in rush .Elspeth said:Well, given that she's old enough to be their mother, that's hardly surprising.
If you read carefuly whole thing in my post's window you will know that my post was to give a comment to other post, not independently about comparing the beauties of womans from difference age. My mistake was I didn't make it clear enough by putting the reason which make my opinion became reasonable, "that it is because of the fact that these crownprincesses have quite big difference in age with Camilla's" (again, I had wrote it in rush).Warren said:Originally Posted by galuhcandrakirana
I don't know much ... she seems to be the worst looking crown princess in Europe .
So, I guess the debate about Charles and Camilla's marriage has now reached another level ... in the absence of any rational argument, just call her "the worst looking", or that "she looks like a man" (as stated in a previous post). Even worse than that, Camilla is not as pretty as women half her age. Shocking!
Time to grow up and move on, I think.
.