The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #361  
Old 03-26-2016, 03:47 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Y'know, all these comments about how Will should pay attention to his image and clean up his PR and watch what he does or doesn't do as it affects people's opinions makes me think that folks view him more as a politician than a Prince of the UK.



Totally different roles. One needs to popular opinion to keep their butts in office and influence the government proceedings. They depend on the constituents to support them.



The other doesn't do what he does for self gratification, money, free lunches or the adulation and admiration of the masses. If Harry was to decide to go into seclusion and settle with the Gurkhas in Nepal and William moved his family to the Andes to raise llamas, who do you think would take over their causes? Would anyone really volunteer to do what they do for free?



Just wondering.

If they got the homes the staff the clothes the nanny their bills paid etc etc I think there would be a line ten miles long at least


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
__________________

  #362  
Old 03-26-2016, 04:09 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Y'know, all these comments about how Will should pay attention to his image and clean up his PR and watch what he does or doesn't do as it affects people's opinions makes me think that folks view him more as a politician than a Prince of the UK.

Totally different roles. One needs to popular opinion to keep their butts in office and influence the government proceedings. They depend on the constituents to support them.

The other doesn't do what he does for self gratification, money, free lunches or the adulation and admiration of the masses. If Harry was to decide to go into seclusion and settle with the Gurkhas in Nepal and William moved his family to the Andes to raise llamas, who do you think would take over their causes? Would anyone really volunteer to do what they do for free?

Just wondering.
I doubt anyone would volunteer to do what they do. Frankly, there's nothing all that great about being a British royal other then always having an ornate roof over your head, and apparently those leak. That's why I never blame William, Harry, Beatrice, and Eugenie for seeking opportunities outside the UK. I'd need to clear my head away from the constraints and toxic press, too.
__________________

  #363  
Old 03-26-2016, 04:32 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,041
As I read somewhere, Royal life is life in a birdcage, it's a glided birdcage but a birdcage none the less.

There is a long history of the British royals doing stuff outside of Britain. You have multiple realms and a former empire now commonwealth that other monarchies don't really have. Princes were sent out into the Royal Navy, on tours of foreign realms. Charles was sent to school for sometime in Australia, Andrew in Canada, etc.

Philip helped to found the WWF, Anne is President of Save the Children UK (which saves the children of places outside the UK too) Harry founded Sentabale to help out in Lethesoto. William is just following in the conservation footsteps of his father and grandfather.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
  #364  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:45 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione View Post
Yea, this all seems pretty normal to me. My (very soon to be) husband has a good friend who got married to her husband last year and I couldn't go because I had to work.

Being a normal human, I didn't see any reason my work schedule should keep my partner from seeing his long time friends

There is literally nothing wrong with anything William is doing here.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
I agree. I mean, married people dont have to be glued to the hip. If one persons scheduel doesn't allow for something doesn't mean the other one has to stay home. Or if you don't like your spouses friend, you can skip the wedding but let the spouse go. Nothing fishy about it at all in my mind. They're not highschool kids.
  #365  
Old 03-26-2016, 01:23 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,728
I think older people (of which I am one) find it harder to understand that younger couples have no problems doing things on their own. My husband and I frequently travel separately, although we always prefer to go together.
For example, when my son (and his dog) moved cross country in a pickup truck, I very nobly chose to let my husband be the second driver :).
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
  #366  
Old 03-26-2016, 01:34 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
I think older people (of which I am one) find it harder to understand that younger couples have no problems doing things on their own. My husband and I frequently travel separately, although we always prefer to go together.
For example, when my son (and his dog) moved cross country in a pickup truck, I very nobly chose to let my husband be the second driver :).
Yeah, and even among younger people some couple are like that. It's not so much that "it' s more fun to be together" since younger people also like hanging out with their partner. Just that (especially for women) people are no longer expected to give up other parts of their lives. And that is ok as well. What I am trying to say is that neither version is wrong or should be judged. If you and your partner go to the bathroom together, great for you, but don't judge others that dont. Same the other way. If you and your partner only meet up once a month by choice, good for you, but don't judge others that don't. Different things work for different people and different couples.
  #367  
Old 03-26-2016, 01:35 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,189
Perhaps the media will drop the Jecca stories now she's getting married. Couldn't have been easy for her or Catherine dealing with the headlines. Lord knows, the rumors even made it to the boring movies that was done about the royal couple.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #368  
Old 03-26-2016, 02:19 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Perhaps the media will drop the Jecca stories now she's getting married. Couldn't have been easy for her or Catherine dealing with the headlines. Lord knows, the rumors even made it to the boring movies that was done about the royal couple.
Doubtful they will stop. The Queen and Lord Porchester were both married but that didn't stop the tabloids from wagging their eyebrows because a man and woman were friends. I'm sure they will insinuate that William is the biological father of Jecca's future children, just like Lord Porchester is the 'father' of Prince Andrew.
  #369  
Old 03-26-2016, 03:13 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: central valley, United States
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley View Post
Doubtful they will stop. The Queen and Lord Porchester were both married but that didn't stop the tabloids from wagging their eyebrows because a man and woman were friends. I'm sure they will insinuate that William is the biological father of Jecca's future children, just like Lord Porchester is the 'father' of Prince Andrew.
Yep, the media will conveniently ignore facts such as that William and Jecca were in different hemispheres when said children were conceived and run w/ the jealous Kate angle.
Why let factual impossibility interfere with bait click for drivel?
  #370  
Old 03-26-2016, 03:27 PM
eya eya is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 8,700
Prince William joins champagne reception celebrations for ex-girlfriend 'Jecca' Craig's wedding - Telegraph
  #371  
Old 03-26-2016, 03:35 PM
GracieGiraffe's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Giraffe Land, United States
Posts: 2,541
Is that one of those places where the giraffes come up to the house and are fed by the guests???
__________________
The future George VII's opinion on infant carriers,
"One is not amused."
  #372  
Old 03-26-2016, 04:40 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 775
Oh I do wish theses friends would stop having weddings overseas.
  #373  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:21 PM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
William wanted his children to see African animals in the wild. Why not take George (and the Nanny) with him to Africa?

During the wedding the Nanny could take care of George and when William is not busy. He could take George around to see the rhinos, zebras, elephants, cheetahs and lions that live on the property.

George is old enough to enough a trip to the game reserve.
(In the Telegraph photo there is a boy around George's age running around.)

William would not be receiving so much criticism is he had taken George with him.
  #374  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:22 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
William wanted his children to see African animals in the wild. Why not take George (and the Nanny) with him to Africa?

During the wedding the Nanny could take care of George and when William is not busy. He could take George around to see the rhinos, zebras, elephants, cheetahs and lions that live on the property.

George is old enough to enough a trip to the game reserve.
(In the Telegraph photo there is a boy around George's age running around.)

William would not be receiving so much criticism is he had taken George with him.
The children are not old enough to remember or appreciate a trip to Kenya
  #375  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:35 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
William wanted his children to see African animals in the wild. Why not take George (and the Nanny) with him to Africa?

During the wedding the Nanny could take care of George and when William is not busy. He could take George around to see the rhinos, zebras, elephants, cheetahs and lions that live on the property.

George is old enough to enough a trip to the game reserve.
(In the Telegraph photo there is a boy around George's age running around.)

William would not be receiving so much criticism is he had taken George with him.
Yeah, but I don't think William was going to leave Charlotte to spend Easter without George. It's a short trip, and I think they will be making an official trip there as a family in the future.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #376  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:45 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,366
I don’t know, George getting shots for Hepatitis A, Typhoid, Yellow Fever, and Meningitis, and taking malaria pills, seems to be a lot of effort, just for a few days in Africa. Maybe when he’s older and will spend more than 3 days there.
  #377  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:56 PM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanyT View Post
The children are not old enough to remember or appreciate a trip to Kenya
He is old enough to enjoy seeing all the animals. He does not need to remember and appreciate every moment of his life.

He is nearly three and he would have enjoyed seeing the rhinoceros, the elephants, the zebras, the cheetahs and the lions on a game reserve rather than in a zoo.

He was fascinated by a pigeon when his mother took him to the museum. Seeing the animals in the 'wild' would have been more interesting than a pigeon. (At least I hope.)
  #378  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:57 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,041
General News and Information for the Duke of Cambridge

Especially when he wont remember it went he is older. I would imagine that William would want to bring his family there when they are old enough to understand it's importance. The place where he connected to wonder of Africa, the place where he proposed to his wife, the mother of his children. Hopefully, the animals in danger will still be there too.

I been to a zoo and saw little kids fascinated with a squirrel than the animals on exhibit. He is better off with his mum, sis, dog at his grandparents for the holiday.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
  #379  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:01 PM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Yeah, but I don't think William was going to leave Charlotte to spend Easter without George. It's a short trip, and I think they will be making an official trip there as a family in the future.
Charlotte is too young to notice how long her brother is out of her sight. (She may actually prefer to have mummy to herself for a few days.)
  #380  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:12 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
Charlotte is too young to notice how long her brother is out of her sight. (She may actually prefer to have mummy to herself for a few days.)
Lol, well I do think William would've brought the kids down with him on a very short and busy trip.

William is getting some flack over attending Jecca's wedding. Imagine the headlines had he took George, it would really get ugly.

The whole thing is fine and he'll be back home soon anyway. It's just the optics is making headlines. It's an avoidable headline, but everyone will get over it once the royal couple start their royal tour. That will be the headline of all headlines.
__________________

__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
General News for the Cambridge Family Part 3: March 2017 JessRulz The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 212 10-18-2017 01:56 AM
Duke and Duchess of Cambridge: Official Visit to Paris - March 17-18, 2017 Rudolph The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 107 03-20-2017 10:09 AM
General News for the Cambridge Family 2: January 2015-March 2017 JessRulz Current Events Archive 1582 03-19-2017 12:27 AM
The Duchess of Cambridge's Daytime Fashion Part 7: March 2012 - April 2012 iceflower Archives 393 04-27-2012 02:10 AM




Popular Tags
best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark duchess of calabria fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia italy iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein luxembourg monarchy news november 2016 october 2016 october and november 2016 picture of the week picture of the week december prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince nicholas prince oscar princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen margrethe queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania in australia queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria what ifs



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises