The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #501  
Old 08-03-2011, 08:31 AM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,426
Who would royals be in today's world without media coverage? Nobodies.
And since the media isnt usually interested in private or public but only the people involved this comes to a downside of the enourmous privileges they enjoy. Overall not a bad deal at all.
__________________

  #502  
Old 08-03-2011, 03:20 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade View Post
Who would royals be in today's world without media coverage? Nobodies.
And since the media isnt usually interested in private or public but only the people involved this comes to a downside of the enourmous privileges they enjoy. Overall not a bad deal at all.
Can you explain that? I don't see how those two can be set apart.
__________________

  #503  
Old 08-03-2011, 03:25 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by fascinator View Post
I don't understand why this is being discussed as though fame is a rare affliction that effects just the two of them, and they are unknowingly stumbling along, surprised anyone would be interested in them.

Public outings garner attention from the public and William has more than ample private grounds if he wants a private stroll with his new bride.
And since William is not overly keen on the press, should he keep to his private grounds and keep his mouth shut and face on "happy mode" when on public grounds?

Quote:
There is nothing surprising or overly intrusive about a member of the press taking a picture of W&K walking, hand in hand, in a public park the day after attending a major event.
I think it is rather fatigue of the general attitude of the British press.

Quote:
And please stop playing the Diana card anytime William has his photo taken. He's a big boy and Kate knew what she was signing up for. They were not being chased or harmed in any way.
That is where opinions differ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRSJ View Post
In a way I agree.....as long as the photos are not too intrusive or inappropriate .....in a way I do feel worse for William bc unlike a celeb he didn't try to acheive fame but was born to it......
Exactly, and some people here seem to imply that because of that he may not ever be grumpy about it. That is very black and white, imo.
  #504  
Old 08-03-2011, 04:11 PM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Can you explain that? I don't see how those two can be set apart.
I wanted to say that the media will take pictures no matter if they are out and about for "private" or "public" reasons: if they stroll through a public park, there will be pictures, if they like it or not. If they dont want any pictures, they have to stay inside their walls or inside the vast private area that belongs to the British crown.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
That is where opinions differ.
Where did you see them being chased or harmed in that case (when strolling through the park)?
  #505  
Old 08-03-2011, 04:54 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade View Post
I wanted to say that the media will take pictures no matter if they are out and about for "private" or "public" reasons: if they stroll through a public park, there will be pictures, if they like it or not. If they dont want any pictures, they have to stay inside their walls or inside the vast private area that belongs to the British crown.


Where did you see them being chased or harmed in that case (when strolling through the park)?
Not necessarily chased or harmed, but bothered. I was simply stating the different opinions about this particular thing.
  #506  
Old 08-03-2011, 05:18 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
And since William is not overly keen on the press, should he keep to his private grounds and keep his mouth shut and face on "happy mode" when on public grounds?
No- he can frown if he wants to.
  #507  
Old 08-03-2011, 05:52 PM
figtreecrossing's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Midwest, Australia
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Not necessarily chased or harmed, but bothered. I was simply stating the different opinions about this particular thing.
If it was my own private time, and I wanted to take a walk in a beautiful park with my other half without being hassled by the press taking photos from bushes, I'd take a large black umbrella with me. If I spotted cameras, I'd hoist the umbrella in that direction. It would ruin any good photos.
The couple need to develop some easy creative ways to foil good photos
  #508  
Old 08-03-2011, 06:11 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,503
In the pictures I've seen neither William or Kate looks overly bothered about having their picture taken. The most I can see - if I look hard - is mild annoyance in some of the shots. Mostly, though, they just look like many other couples would if you took a random picture of them walking in a park.

I've noticed that William and particularly Kate are good at staying neutral when being photographed. I think this is probably the best way to handle the situation because what the paparazzi want is an emotional reaction of some kind - makes for better pictures.
  #509  
Old 08-03-2011, 06:26 PM
Baroness of Books's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,806
And who knows, maybe it was simply the topic they were discussing that William was responding to. As another poster might have mentioned, we can't always affix emotions or try to interpret what we see in photos. Unless, of course, it's really obvious what they might be reacting to in the photo.
  #510  
Old 08-03-2011, 08:38 PM
MRSJ's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,862
Considering how long both have been having their picture taken I'm gonna assume while they may not love it every second they're prob not annoyed much by it anymore or surprised and have learned to ignore it. I agree with other posters that the facial experessions are probably reactions to the conversation....
  #511  
Old 08-03-2011, 10:06 PM
shari-aree's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: melbourne, Australia
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by BritishRoyals View Post
William & Kate's feelings for each other is personal. Your opinion, my opinion and everyone else's who don't know them personally are speculative at best. From my personal point of view, I find no reason to suspect that William isn't in love and completely devoted to his new wife. I think they are carrying themselves with good grace, class, discretion and dignity befit of their future roles.

... May I say that you have responded also in good grace and with class, I very much like your post and believe that it sums up the feelings on many many people, Thank you.
__________________
" 'an harm none; thy will be done "
  #512  
Old 08-04-2011, 12:38 AM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by figtreecrossing View Post
If it was my own private time, and I wanted to take a walk in a beautiful park with my other half without being hassled by the press taking photos from bushes, I'd take a large black umbrella with me. If I spotted cameras, I'd hoist the umbrella in that direction. It would ruin any good photos.
The couple need to develop some easy creative ways to foil good photos
Thats a no-no for William & Kate in their position. They need the media for survival and cannot afford to annoy them in such "normal" situations in public places.
It is well known that especially Charles & William loathe the media and they are already on the edge within their boundaries of what can be done to avoid them, cant go any further without threatening their own position.
Just imagine William came out with a black umbrella every time he is "private", public opinion would turn against him very quickly.
  #513  
Old 08-04-2011, 01:38 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles CA, United States
Posts: 1,082
This conversation reminds me of something Betty Ford said. She was the wife of the late President Gerald Ford. Betty Ford died a month ago. She had been a very beautiful young woman who was a model in her youth. She understood what was needed from her as the wife of a congressman, as a newlywed and later. That being said, still she said this - clearly there are points when the 'pressing in' is felt as intolerable -

Betty Ford Quote -
“From the outside, our life looked like a Norman Rockwell illustration,” Mrs. Ford said at one point. Nevertheless, by 1962, she was seeing a psychiatrist twice a week because, as she put it, “I’d lost my feeling of self-worth.”

“I think a lot of women go through this,” she said. “Their husbands have fascinating jobs, their children start to turn into independent people and the women begin to feel useless, empty.”

Later, when she accompanied her husband on campaign trips more frequently, she acknowledged that that, too, was not all fun. At one point, she recalled, she was in an airport and “through clenched teeth said: ‘I don’t want anyone to come over and talk to me. I just want to sit here all alone and finish this cigarette.’ ”


I think the inability of some well-known people from whatever walk of life to have the ability to go about their business without comment or fear of being told about to the press puts them in an intolerable life condition.

I was raised in New England USA and grew up in a small town that had scads of well known people living there and/or passing through. No one treated them anyway but as regular folks. Once a well known actor who raised his family in the town gave an interview in which he commented on the fact that he could sit at a cafe table out in the open and not one person would give him a second look. He indicated that having that freedom was precious to him.
  #514  
Old 08-04-2011, 07:22 AM
figtreecrossing's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Midwest, Australia
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade View Post
Thats a no-no for William & Kate in their position. They need the media for survival and cannot afford to annoy them in such "normal" situations in public places.
It is well known that especially Charles & William loathe the media and they are already on the edge within their boundaries of what can be done to avoid them, cant go any further without threatening their own position.
Just imagine William came out with a black umbrella every time he is "private", public opinion would turn against him very quickly.
I do get your point about the look of the black umbrella but do you know what it sounds like you're describing?
A relationship of co-dependancy between the Royals and the Press.
If that is the case it doesn't sound healthy
  #515  
Old 08-04-2011, 07:48 AM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by figtreecrossing View Post
I do get your point about the look of the black umbrella but do you know what it sounds like you're describing?
A relationship of co-dependancy between the Royals and the Press.
If that is the case it doesn't sound healthy
but it is the truth. royals depend on public opinion and the media have huge impact on public opinion. there are deals going on all the time, eg william being left alone during uni in exchange for exclusives from time to time, two other examples for media influencing public opinion is prince andrew resigning as foreign business embassador or camilla not attending the diana memorial.
there are certain boundaries that are better not overstepped, for the media but as well for the royals. black umbrellas in order to prevent photos on private occasions on public grounds would be one, for certain.
  #516  
Old 08-04-2011, 12:35 PM
CrownPrincess5's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade

Thats a no-no for William & Kate in their position. They need the media for survival and cannot afford to annoy them in such "normal" situations in public places.
It is well known that especially Charles & William loathe the media and they are already on the edge within their boundaries of what can be done to avoid them, cant go any further without threatening their own position.
Just imagine William came out with a black umbrella every time he is "private", public opinion would turn against him very quickly.
I agree.
The media is important for royals and celebrities alike. I can't remember his name but there was a particular celebrity who was hassled by the press day and night. He eventually fended off and annoyed the press and media boycotted him, they didn't take his pictures anymore and he went downhill from there.

William and Kate do not like it but they have to tolerate it. It's a give and take situation. The press is vital for their survival.
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living.
-Steven Spielberg
  #517  
Old 08-04-2011, 01:33 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles CA, United States
Posts: 1,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5 View Post
William and Kate do not like it but they have to tolerate it. It's a give and take situation. The press is vital for their survival.
I don't think anyone has the 'right' to intrude, to strip someone of their privacy.

If the press is vital for their 'survival' - in what way? - then its not worth surviving - whatever it is. Who the heck cares what 'the press' thinks?

Other monarchies are able to have daily going-about-their-business lives. The Swedish King and Queen apparently went food shopping every Sunday afternoon as their children were growing - what an image of normalcy and saneness - family life in full view and without intrusion.

The concern will always be the corrosive nature on the psyche of those being subjected to such unrelenting scrutiny. 'The public' has a 'right' to the protocol and ceremony - but since when did it become a 'right' to the personal, every day 24/7?
  #518  
Old 08-04-2011, 01:52 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: san francisco, United States
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger View Post
I don't think anyone has the 'right' to intrude, to strip someone of their privacy.

If the press is vital for their 'survival' - in what way? - then its not worth surviving - whatever it is. Who the heck cares what 'the press' thinks?

Other monarchies are able to have daily going-about-their-business lives. The Swedish King and Queen apparently went food shopping every Sunday afternoon as their children were growing - what an image of normalcy and saneness - family life in full view and without intrusion.

The concern will always be the corrosive nature on the psyche of those being subjected to such unrelenting scrutiny. 'The public' has a 'right' to the protocol and ceremony - but since when did it become a 'right' to the personal, every day 24/7?
I agree...
  #519  
Old 08-04-2011, 02:06 PM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 13,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger View Post
Other monarchies are able to have daily going-about-their-business lives. The Swedish King and Queen apparently went food shopping every Sunday afternoon as their children were growing - what an image of normalcy and saneness - family life in full view and without intrusion.

The concern will always be the corrosive nature on the psyche of those being subjected to such unrelenting scrutiny. 'The public' has a 'right' to the protocol and ceremony - but since when did it become a 'right' to the personal, every day 24/7?
When was that? In the 1980ies? Media world has changed since then and its not about the royal good guys and the media bad guys. Royals use the media for their own purposes as much as the media uses the royals for their purposes.

Back to William & Kate - they have been courting the media to the full eg during their trip to Canada & the US, they got all the nice & sugary coverage, very good for their image, and in return they will have to take in to be photographed while taking a walk or grocery shopping. Its a business deal, no harm on either side.

Of course they would like to be photographed only when they like and the media only coming up with pre-approved stories but those times when royals were untouchable are thankfully over.
  #520  
Old 08-04-2011, 03:04 PM
CrownPrincess5's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger

I don't think anyone has the 'right' to intrude, to strip someone of their privacy.

If the press is vital for their 'survival' - in what way? - then its not worth surviving - whatever it is. Who the heck cares what 'the press' thinks?

Other monarchies are able to have daily going-about-their-business lives. The Swedish King and Queen apparently went food shopping every Sunday afternoon as their children were growing - what an image of normalcy and saneness - family life in full view and without intrusion.

The concern will always be the corrosive nature on the psyche of those being subjected to such unrelenting scrutiny. 'The public' has a 'right' to the protocol and ceremony - but since when did it become a 'right' to the personal, every day 24/7?
I'm sorry but what year are you living in? We're far away from the 70s and 80s. I agree that they need a certain amount of privacy. But how much privacy you expect them to get when they're strolling outside in the public? If they want true privacy then I say stay at home. Will and Kate are smarter than people think. They know what theyre doing. I just don't get why everyone feels sorry for them. I guarantee they don't feel sorry for themselves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade

When was that? In the 1980ies? Media world has changed since then and its not about the royal good guys and the media bad guys. Royals use the media for their own purposes as much as the media uses the royals for their purposes.

Back to William & Kate - they have been courting the media to the full eg during their trip to Canada & the US, they got all the nice & sugary coverage, very good for their image, and in return they will have to take in to be photographed while taking a walk or grocery shopping. Its a business deal, no harm on either side.

Of course they would like to be photographed only when they like and the media only coming up with pre-approved stories but those times when royals were untouchable are thankfully over.
Exactly!
__________________

__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living.
-Steven Spielberg
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
administrator alqasimi aristocracy armenia belgian castles crown crown prince hussein's future wife current events cyprus denmark duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex earl of wessex foundation french revolution friendly city future future wife of prince hussein genealogy general news germany greece harry headship kiko king philippe lady louise mountbatten-windsor lineage lithuania lithuanian palaces meghan markle memoir monaco royal monarchist monarchy monogram mountbatten naples netflix official visit patron patronages potential areas prince aymeric prince charles prince harry prince nicholas prince of wales prince peter princess anne princess benedikte princess eugenie princess louise princess margaret qe2 queen mathilde rania of jordan relationship royal children russian imperial family savoy saxony south africa south korea spanish history state visit state visit to denmark united kingdom



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises