Chelsy Davy: News and Pictures 3: Feb-May 2006

[Skydragon]

Originally Posted by Laraib

Are they THE sexiest royals or ONE of the sexiest royals?

They are not royals at all!:)

[Hart]

Just flicking through the web, came across this article about Chelsy.

Thought it may of interest to some of you..... enjoy....

http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/0...-with-charles/

[Warren]

The story claims Wills and Harry are angry with their father because Kate and Chelsy haven't been invited to the Queen's private birthday party, but then ends with: "Although the Queen is said to like Kate, it seems she wants to keep this bash for close family only."
Never let the facts, or simple logic, get in the way of a good beat-up!

[Elspeth]

I wonder which "British Sunday newspaper" they're talking about.

[Hart]

Originally Posted by Elspeth

I wonder which "British Sunday newspaper" they're talking about.

Probably the Sunday Telegraph... I would imagine. Why do you ask? To check it out?

[margotantoinette]

I find it perfectly understandable that QEII would want to keep her birthday party to just close family. And while I understand that it could be considered to be a snub for Kate, given that we know for a fact she's met the Queen, I'm not at all perturbed by the fact that Chelsy wasn't invited. I don't know quite what it is about her, but she has an air that rubs me the wrong way. IMHO the sooner Harry moves on the better.

[Skydragon]

Originally Posted by Hart

Probably the Sunday Telegraph... I would imagine. Why do you ask? To check it out?

Their 'source' in the other article is The People which is something to do with the Mirror, I think!

[Skydragon]

Originally Posted by Warren

The story claims Wills and Harry are angry with their father because Kate and Chelsy haven't been invited to the Queen's private birthday party, but then ends with: "Although the Queen is said to like Kate, it seems she wants to keep this bash for close family only."
Never let the facts, or simple logic, get in the way of a good beat-up!

Facts? Logic? What have these to do with anything the papers write about the British Royals?

[Elspeth]

Originally Posted by Hart

Probably the Sunday Telegraph... I would imagine. Why do you ask? To check it out?

To see how reliable a Sunday paper they're quoting as their source.

[Hart]

Originally Posted by margotantoinette

I find it perfectly understandable that QEII would want to keep her birthday party to just close family. And while I understand that it could be considered to be a snub for Kate, given that we know for a fact she's met the Queen, I'm not at all perturbed by the fact that Chelsy wasn't invited. I don't know quite what it is about her, but she has an air that rubs me the wrong way. IMHO the sooner Harry moves on the better.

I totally agree with you, why should the Queen of England invite Chelsy, a girl who's been 'dating' her grandson, probably only seeing him a handful of times a year. Its crazy that the media even question this decision of invites!
It should be a personal affair, its not as if we're talking about an ordinary family here.

[margotantoinette]

Originally Posted by Hart

I totally agree with you, why should the Queen of England invite Chelsy, a girl who's been 'dating' her grandson, probably only seeing him a handful of times a year. Its crazy that the media even question this decision of invites!
It should be a personal affair, its not as if we're talking about an ordinary family here.

exactly! silly media trying to find a scandal or slight in every little thing.

[leahteresa]

I have always read that, until the ring is on the finger, partners are not invited into the inner circle.

Oh and Chelsy has appeal like Tonya Harding.

[Echo7]

I'm pretty sure that's right about the whole engagement thing. You never saw Sophie at events before she and Edward got engaged but I could be wrong.

[selrahc4]

Originally Posted by Echo7

I'm pretty sure that's right about the whole engagement thing. You never saw Sophie at events before she and Edward got engaged but I could be wrong.

She accompanied Edward to the decommissioning of the Royal Yacht Britannia in 1997, for one.

[babybird]

Don't know if this link has been posted.


http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/stor...ws/news2.shtml

[Skydragon]

Originally Posted by babybird

Don't know if this link has been posted.
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/stor...ws/news2.shtml

As it's the News of the World, the biggest sleaze paper known to man or woman, who only ever say 'an unnamed source' 'an unnamed sandhurst spokesman', 'an unnamed close friend' etc, we will probably never know if any of it is true or not.
I especially like the statement that the recruits are out drinking every night, it just doesn't happen!

[Warren]

Originally Posted by Skydragon

As it's the News of the World, the biggest sleaze paper known to man or woman, who only ever say 'an unnamed source' 'an unnamed sandhurst spokesman', 'an unnamed close friend' etc, we will probably never know if any of it is true or not.

You forgot to mention "friends fear...", "a close friend in Cape Town said..." and "a family friend said..."
These chatty 'friends' are impeccable sources!

[Hart]

Hmmmm.... this doesn't sit well with me at all. As much as I wished that this article was true, you never can trust the News of the World. Fingers crossed we see an article soon saying they've broken up!

[pollyemma]

I'll second that.

i am not familiar with news of the world but i am often surprised at how accurate some tabloid reports are.

[Warren]

As was done in the Kate Middleton thread, the three British Forums moderators decided this thread also needed a clean-up.

• All off-topic comments not relating to Chelsy Davy current events have been removed.
• All arguments as to whether Kate goes clubbing more than Chelsy, or vice versa, have been removed.

This thread is for the discussion of Chelsy Davy current events; any post that is off topic or involves the rehashing of the same old arguments is subject to removal.

thanks,
Warren
British Forums moderator