The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #541  
Old 11-19-2014, 02:22 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 17,696
Behind the scenes in the Cathedral

Behind the scenes in the Cathedral - King Richard III in Leicester
__________________

__________________
1st of August 2016-Death of Queen Anne of Romania
Reply With Quote
  #542  
Old 11-19-2014, 05:29 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 2,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by An Ard Ri View Post
Richard III: Not Such A Bad Guy After All?

Interview: Mike Pitts, Author Of 'Digging For Richard III' : NPR

Digging for Richard III sounds like an excellent book!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #543  
Old 11-26-2014, 07:19 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 17,696
Leicester Cathedral’s King Richard lll Community Appeal launched

Leicester Cathedral’s King Richard lll Community Appeal launched - King Richard III in Leicester
__________________
1st of August 2016-Death of Queen Anne of Romania
Reply With Quote
  #544  
Old 12-02-2014, 12:58 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 17,696
Richard III is back in the news today

Does Richard III's DNA question the Queen's right to the throne? Analysis reveals relative of the monarch may have been conceived out of wedlock | Daily Mail Online

BBC News - Richard III's DNA throws up infidelity surprise


King Richard III – case closed after 529 years — University of Leicester
__________________
1st of August 2016-Death of Queen Anne of Romania
Reply With Quote
  #545  
Old 12-02-2014, 01:06 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,269
And the fails 'journalists' are unable even to use spellchecker, to get 'medieval' right...
Reply With Quote
  #546  
Old 12-02-2014, 06:33 PM
rominet09's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LIEGE, Belgium
Posts: 3,547
Thrilling, what a pity we will never know for sure who cheated !
Reply With Quote
  #547  
Old 12-02-2014, 09:37 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,923
Henry Tudor's blood claim to throne was pretty weak. However, if you kill the King, it helps your claim out immensely. Then you marry a York princess which brings together the Lancasters and Yorks.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #548  
Old 12-02-2014, 11:46 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: central valley, United States
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by rominet09 View Post
Thrilling, what a pity we will never know for sure who cheated !
We'll probably never know, but I'd bet it was Edmund of Langley's wife Isabella of Castille, after all it was much commented on when she was alive that she had loose morals and Pugh noted that her youngest son, Richard of Conisburg (Richard III's grandfather,) was quite possibly fathered by her lover John of Holland rather than her husband Edmund.
Reply With Quote
  #549  
Old 12-03-2014, 12:39 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,309
It's fascinating stuff, but the British Press always enjoys a 'do the Windsors have a right to the throne' angle in these sort of reports.
Reply With Quote
  #550  
Old 12-03-2014, 01:03 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 10,893
The press seem to ignore the fact that The House of Windsor reigns due to the legislation passed by the parliament in 1701 and for no other reason.
Reply With Quote
  #551  
Old 12-03-2014, 02:04 AM
Zonk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 11,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
The press seem to ignore the fact that The House of Windsor reigns due to the legislation passed by the parliament in 1701 and for no other reason.
Why let a little thing like the law get in the way of tabloid headline?!

Good Lord.....if they had DNA tests back in the day. Imagine the impact on history?
__________________
.

Reply With Quote
  #552  
Old 12-03-2014, 09:25 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
The press seem to ignore the fact that The House of Windsor reigns due to the legislation passed by the parliament in 1701 and for no other reason.
The BBC article gets this fact actually:

Quote:
"Henry VII was descended from Edward III from the Beaufort line - the Beauforts were legitimised by half-brother Henry IV but not in succession. Royal succession has been based on many things in the past: ability to lead troops, religion, connections - not always seniority by royal blood."
She added: "The Queen's right to reign in based on the 1701 Act of Settlement that restricted succession to Protestant descendants of Sophia of Hanover. A medieval false paternity does not challenge the current Queen's right to reign."
Reply With Quote
  #553  
Old 12-05-2014, 12:40 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by sndral View Post
We'll probably never know, but I'd bet it was Edmund of Langley's wife Isabella of Castille, after all it was much commented on when she was alive that she had loose morals and Pugh noted that her youngest son, Richard of Conisburg (Richard III's grandfather,) was quite possibly fathered by her lover John of Holland rather than her husband Edmund.
If that were the case, then surely there is no real effect on the succession because Richard, Earl of Cambridge, married Anne Mortimer who was great granddaughter of Lionel of Antwerp and thus from the senior line of Edward III, therefore the Yorkist claim would remain intact?
Reply With Quote
  #554  
Old 12-05-2014, 10:45 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,299
Okay, so I've taken the time to look through the University of Leicester's page of the results and I've developed a few thoughts.

First, there are two false paternity events that have been discovered; of the 5 living "male-line" relatives of Richard III, 4 of them have one type of Y-chromosome and the 5th has another - meaning that at some point in the last few generations a false paternity event happened and at least one of these so-called male line descendants of the 5th Duke of Beaufort is not actually a male-line descendant of him at all (the results don't say if the 4 matching descendants have the same type of Y-chromosome as the 5th Duke, or if it's the odd-one out; it does say that geneological information shows that all 5 of them do descend from him, just not necessarily in a male-line).

Adding to this is the fact that Richard's DNA is not of the same Y-chromosome type as any of the 5 descendants, meaning that at some point either between Edward III and Richard III or between Edward III and the 5th Duke there was at least 1 other false paternity event.

This doesn't necessarily mean anything about succession claims though. First of all, there is a span of 19 generations in which this event could have happened. Second of all, if it happened at some point between Edward and Richard it only has about a 50% chance of affecting his blood claim - if either Richard himself or Richard's father were illegitimate then the claim would have been affected, although he still would have been descended from Edward III (as he descends from Edward III in three different lines). The York claim didn't come through a purely male-line, and really both Richard and Edward staked their claim via conquest/resumption.

Thirdly it doesn't necessarily mean anything for the Lancaster succession; unless the false paternity event occurred at John of Gaunt, then the Lancasters and the Beauforts descend from different children of John of Gaunt (and, for that matter, different wives). Further, it doesn't necessarily mean anything about Henry VII's claim either, as the 5th Duke of Somerset descends in a male line from a different grandson of John of Gaunt than Henry does; Henry was the grandson of the 1st Duke of Somerset, while the 5th Duke was the descendant of the 2nd Duke of Somerset (younger brother of the 1st Duke).
Reply With Quote
  #555  
Old 12-06-2014, 07:19 PM
LauraS3514's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA, United States
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlLewis View Post
If that were the case, then surely there is no real effect on the succession because Richard, Earl of Cambridge, married Anne Mortimer who was great granddaughter of Lionel of Antwerp and thus from the senior line of Edward III, therefore the Yorkist claim would remain intact?
Exactly. The York's title may have come from Edmund of Langely, but their claim to the throne came from Anne Mortimer, the ultimate heiress of Lionel of Antwerp, the second son of Edward III.
Reply With Quote
  #556  
Old 01-06-2015, 01:41 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 17,696
Genealogist claims Benedict Cumberbatch is as closely related to Richard III as the QUEEN

Benedict Cumberbatch is as closely related to Richard III as the QUEEN | Daily Mail Online
__________________
1st of August 2016-Death of Queen Anne of Romania
Reply With Quote
  #557  
Old 01-06-2015, 01:50 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,269
A programme lately aired on Radio 4, assessing whether Richard iii did indeed live a 'great life'..

BBC Radio 4 - Great Lives, Series 35, Philippa Langley on Richard III
Reply With Quote
  #558  
Old 01-07-2015, 06:12 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,309
Interesting, but Philippa Langley is far from unbiased.
Reply With Quote
  #559  
Old 01-08-2015, 06:29 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 17,696
Richard III's coffin rosary blessed at Clare Priory in Suffolk

BBC News - Richard III coffin rosary blessed at priory
__________________
1st of August 2016-Death of Queen Anne of Romania
Reply With Quote
  #560  
Old 01-08-2015, 05:44 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 2,802
I like the fact that an enameled white rose was added to the rosary.
I like the fact how very diligent details are being carried out and with historical accuracy in the preparation of Leicester Cathedral.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Richard III and the Battle of Bosworth: A "What If?" lady of hay British Royal History 93 Today 08:58 AM
Reburial of the remains of Alexei and Maria Grace Angel The Imperial Family of Russia 129 01-04-2017 12:42 PM
"Anne Neville: Richard III's Tragic Queen" by Amy License CarolynHarris Royal Library 12 09-13-2013 02:48 PM




Popular Tags
albania beatrice (1986- ) best gown september 2016 best outfit best outfit september 2016 biography birthday christening crown prince crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion denmark duchess of cambridge duchess of cambridge evening wear duke of cambridge fashion poll general news jewels king abdullah ii king abdullah in new zealand king carl gustaf and queen silvia king willem-alexander monarchy multiple births natural disasters november 2016 october 2016 official visit picture of the week prince charles princess beatrice princess charlene princess charlene eveningwear princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary eveningwear princess mary fashion princess mary style princess mette-marit fashion and style princess sofia queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia cocktail dresses queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia eveningwear queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen mathilde in jordan queen mathilde style queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania daytime fashion queen rania fashion queen rania in new zealand september 2016 state visit succession sweden the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises