the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > British Royal History
Portal Royal Articles Royal Calendar Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:52 AM
tiaraprin's Avatar
Royal Highness
Near NY City - United States
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,944
Default

Queen Victoria died at the age of 81 of natural causes in January 1901.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-28-2005, 02:53 PM
Nobility
Moscow - Russia
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 371
Default

Does anyone know which monarch was the last one to pay a state visit to Queen Victoria? It should've been some time in 1900.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-13-2007, 01:23 PM
Newbie
ATLANTA - United States
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Default LanderB

Just wanted to say hello to everyone. I just joined the forum and look forward to posting and replying to everyone.

One question. Does anyone have any updated information on Queen Victoria and John Brown? I really do believe he was her lover in a quiet tender way. What does everyone think of this? Or, is there a thread already about this? Please let me know
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-13-2007, 04:16 PM
fee's Avatar
fee fee is offline
Aristocracy
Stuttgart - Germany
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 154
Default

HI welcome on board,
I've just started reading a book on John Brown, I'll let you know what I think about him .
Victorias response to the OB/GYN advice is hilarious. This coming from the founder of Victorian etiquette and prudery .
However, she was also one of the very first women to use anesthetics in childbirth, and even though the whole of oldfashioned Britain screamed that her son's hemophilia was a result to this, a punishment for "depriving God of the most sincerest cries of female remorse" she went on using it for each of the consecutive labours, describing childbirth as a walk in the park
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-13-2007, 04:26 PM
Aristocracy
Melbourne - Australia
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 162
Default

Queen Victoria was not the "founder of Victorian etiquette and prudery" at all. She was not an overt follower of etiquette nor was she particularly prudish for the time.

That various customs, fashions etc. are labelled "Victorian" is not necessarily anything to do with Queen Victoria herself.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-13-2007, 05:00 PM
Sister Morphine's Avatar
Serene Highness
North Carolina branches, Chicago roots. - United States
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,225
Default

I can't remember if I read it here or if it was somewhere else, but after Victoria had her youngest child, The Princess Beatrice, she was advised not to have anymore children. Her reply was, "What, I can't have fun in bed anymore?"


I don't think that is very prudish. LOL
__________________
So let's leave it alone
Because we can't see eye to eye
There ain't good guy, there ain't no bad guy
There's only you and me and we just disagree.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 04-29-2007, 08:25 PM
Commoner
Jacksonville - United States
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Smile Queen Victoria and her Family

I am rather new to this forum. This may have been done before but, I would like to start a new thread about Queen Victoria, her family and descendants. She is probably my favorite Queen of England. The whole Victorian Age interests me. I have just read the book about Queen Victoria's daughters and would like to hear other opinions on them. I am most fasinated with Alice and Louise. Anyway, I look forward to this discussion.

Thanks,

Beth
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-03-2007, 05:15 PM
Aristocracy
Saint-Peterburg - Russia
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
Default Predictions and prophecies in a life of Royal dynasties.

___I am interested in this theme for a long time. The last year the known Russian publishing house has published my book « Fatal Predictions of Russia » (the predictions and the prophecies in the life of the last Russian emperor Nicholas II). During work under this book I have read the book of English foreteller Louis Hamon (Cheiro) “ Fate in the Making Revelations of a Lifetime ” (1931, N-Y and London). Very interesting!
___In chapter IV (“ King Edward VII ”) Hamon wrote:
___“ It is no secret now that King Edward was extremely superstitious in certain matters. Perhaps it would be more correct to say that he had an intense belief in occultism, in events foretold by premonitions, and so forth. Even Queen Victoria, strong minded woman though she was, often incurred the displeasure of her consort, Prince Albert, by bemoaning a broken mirror or the spilling of salt … ” Further in this chapter Hamon in detail tells about his meetings with King Edward VII, when Prince of Wales. In particular, he writes:
___«During this talk, he [Prince of Wales] got me to work out, without my knowledge, the charts of the Kaiser and of the Czar of Russia, as well as those of members of the British Royal Family; he gave me the date of birth but not the name of each person … »
___Chapter VII of his book is devote to Hamon's meetings with Nicholas II.
___In more detail about these meetings you can read in my posts at this Forum:

http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f80/nicholas-alexandra-8643-5.html#post605506

Boris Romanov
Saint Petersburg

Russia

___P.S. I’m sorry for my imperfect English.

___You can see also my article “New book about Nicholas II”:

http://www.petroprognoz.spb.ru/articles/12apr7-NicholasII.html

___and MUCH MORE DETAILS in my article “Emperor who knew the destiny” (in Russian):

http://www.petroprognoz.spb.ru/articles/Imperator-11-10-2006.html

P.P.S. Of course, in Russia we know and remember that Empress Alexandra Feodorovna (Nikolay's II wife) was the grand-daughter of Queen Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:18 PM
PR Princess's Avatar
Aristocracy
Isla Canarias/ Pepino, PR - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 129
Default

I admire Queen Victoria, she is one of my favorite Queens in England; first being Queen Elizabeth (Tudor Dynasty).
__________________
"Some people make headlines, while others make history."

Philip Elmer-Dewitt, in Time Magazine
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 12-24-2007, 04:34 AM
RubyPrincess168's Avatar
Courtier
Sun Prairie - United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 538
Default

According to 'National Treasure 2', Queen Victoria supported the Confederacy during the US Civil War because a divided United States was better for Britian and Britian relied on cotton from the South. Is there any truth to this? What is a good source to read more about this?
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 12-25-2007, 02:50 AM
gogm's Avatar
Aristocracy
- United States
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Default Queen Victoria and the US Civil War

The Union was quick to impose a naval blockade. One result was seizing the steamer Trent on the high seas and detaining a couple of Confederate agents in 1861. The problem was the Trent was a British ship.

The UK mobilized for war and was in the process of sending troops to Canada. Prince Albert intervened and slowed things down. Tempers cooled and the invasion of the USA that would have secured the Confederacy never happened. He died shortly thereafter.

Queen Victoria was personally friendly with the Duchess of Sutherland, a foe of slavery.
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-25-2007, 03:04 AM
RubyPrincess168's Avatar
Courtier
Sun Prairie - United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 538
Default

So Queen Victoria was friends with the Duchess who was anti-slavery, but was willing to help the Confederacy because a British ship was captured in a Union blockade? That sounds a little messed up.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-25-2007, 12:45 PM
Melania's Avatar
Gentry
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 68
Default Question about Victoria's title before she became QV...

I have a question about QV's title before she became Queen.


Before she became Queen, wiki.com has her title listed as "heiress presumptive." My questions is, since the death of her father, shouldn't her title have been "heiress apparent" because her father couldn't have any more children (any more sons) to out rank her in the line of succession to the throne; therefore, she should have been heiress apparent because there was no doubt that she would become queen. It was not possible at the time for her to have any younger brothers to out rank her because her father was dead. Why then, was she only known as "heiress presumptive" and not "heiress apparent?"

Thank you if you can answer my question.

Last edited by Warren; 12-26-2007 at 01:19 AM. Reason: reduced font to standard size 2
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 12-25-2007, 07:14 PM
EmpressRouge's Avatar
Courtier
- United States
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 646
Default

She was heiress presumptive because her uncle, King William IV, could have fathered a surviving legitimate child who would have been ahead of Victoria in the line of succession. If William had fathered a daughter, she would have been heiress presumptive, too, as she could have had a brother later on who would have been heir apparent.

Last edited by Elspeth; 01-16-2008 at 07:01 PM. Reason: fix quote tags
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-25-2007, 10:42 PM
Melania's Avatar
Gentry
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 68
Default

^ Oh ok, makes sense. I guess I over looked that because of her uncle's old age. He was 72 when he died, but I guess there was still the slight possibility that he could fathered childen.

Thank you for answering my question. :)
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 12-25-2007, 10:43 PM
gogm's Avatar
Aristocracy
- United States
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Default

Ruby Princess asked, "So Queen Victoria was friends with the Duchess who was anti-slavery, but was willing to help the Confederacy because a British ship was captured in a Union blockade? That sounds a little messed up."

Her husband, Prince Albert, intervened to allow things to settle down. I don't think her husband would have done that if she was pro-slavery. Its safe to believe she supported his actions that kept the UK out of the US Civil War.
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 12-26-2007, 12:33 AM
RubyPrincess168's Avatar
Courtier
Sun Prairie - United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 538
Default

I find this topic very interesting because it certainly isn't covered in our history classes when we learn about the Civil War. Does anybody know of any good books that talk about this in depth?
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 12-27-2007, 09:30 PM
gogm's Avatar
Aristocracy
- United States
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Default V&A's Role in US Civil War

The Civil War was magically skipped back when dinosaurs roamed the earth and I took high school history. Junior year history ended in 1861 and senior year history began in 1865.

A good biography of Queen Victoria should have something about the Trent incident.
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 12-29-2007, 01:07 AM
RubyPrincess168's Avatar
Courtier
Sun Prairie - United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 538
Default

Your history classes skipped the Civil War?! My sophmore year history class went thru the end of the civil war and junior year history started with the reconstruction after the civil war. I remember this because my sophmore history teacher was a CW buff who would spend his summer vacations riding his motorcycle all over visiting various battlegrounds, etc. It's such a huge part of our country's history, which is young compared to European countries, that I surprised you skipped it.

I did find a older biography of Queen Victoria belonging to my mother that mentioned the Trent affair but didn't get too indepth.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 12-29-2007, 06:36 PM
gogm's Avatar
Aristocracy
- United States
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Default

I did a term paper on the Civil War for Junior year History, but the war was not covered. This was in the sate of New York. Apparently its much, much different in the states that made up the Confederacy. They cover it in depth.

I learned about the Civil War on my own and what I found out was different from what US citizens get. The war was won in the west while nitwits lost opportunities in Virginia - in various places in Tennessee, Vicksburg, and by Sherman's invasion of the southern core.
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Princess Victoria (Vicky), Empress Frederick (1840-1901) ritapaiva British Royal History 37 07-01-2008 09:18 AM
King Leopold III of The Belgians (1901-1983) Marengo Belgian Royal History 17 05-13-2008 03:14 AM
Family ties through Queen Victoria SusanE Royal Genealogy 43 09-19-2007 05:49 PM
Princess Alice, Duchess of Gloucester (1901-2004) Catharine British Royals 107 12-30-2005 06:27 AM
Albert, Prince Consort (1819-1861) Elise,LadyofLancaster British Royal History 14 08-20-2005 07:14 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement
Airstream Trailer Forum - Aquarium & Reef Forum
Royal Forum - Book and Reader Forum - Yoga Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Yoga Forum
Interference - U2, Pop Culture & Social Responsibility - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008
Jelsoft Enterprises
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0