 |
|

08-14-2009, 03:48 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
|
|
|
So we can assume that with the supposed link between the Duke of Clarence and Jack the Ripper that Clarence won't be used for the foreseeable future?!
__________________
|

08-14-2009, 04:25 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,527
|
|
|
There is no link between Albert Victor and Jack the Ripper although some have tried to infer as much (along with William Gladstone and even Lewis Carroll).
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

08-14-2009, 01:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 2,406
|
|
|
I'm sure that most people today don't know about the alleged connection to Jack the Ripper. It's going on 120 years, that shouldn't be a problem. After all, they've used Culloden, which I find to be distasteful and inauspicious.
__________________
|

09-05-2009, 09:00 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,155
|
|
Culloden
Quote:
Originally Posted by iowabelle
I'm sure that most people today don't know about the alleged connection to Jack the Ripper. It's going on 120 years, that shouldn't be a problem. After all, they've used Culloden, which I find to be distasteful and inauspicious.
|
I have been reading this thread with great interest and love that more than a century later people have differing views about the poor lamented Prince. Iowabelle, what is the reference to Culloden?
__________________
|

09-06-2009, 09:07 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,527
|
|

Xan, the young son of the Earl and Countess of Ulster and grandson of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester is known as Lord Culloden. Baron Culloden is a subsidiary title of the Duke of Gloucester dating from the current creation in 1928.
The Battle of Culloden spelt the end of hopes for a Stuart restoration when the Jacobite army was routed by Hanoverian forces led by the Duke of Cumberland. To the victor go the spoils; the defeated resent being reminded of it.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

09-07-2009, 05:35 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
|
|
|
You say defeated. The Scots, very rightly, say massacred.
Albert Victor will always be one of the royal family's "might have been"'s.
He's buried at the mausoleum at Frogmore, isn't he?
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 06:18 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 7,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lac2003
You say defeated. The Scots, very rightly, say massacred.
Albert Victor will always be one of the royal family's "might have been"'s.
He's buried at the mausoleum at Frogmore, isn't he?
|
The fact that there were more Scots in the English army than in the Scottish army is often forgotten.
Yes he is buried at Frogmore.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 04:54 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bordertown, Australia
Posts: 76
|
|
|
His tomb is in the Albert Memorial Chapel, St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 05:21 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 1,649
|
|
|
Queen Mary's first boy was called Edward and the second Albert ( future Georges VI).
Was is a remember of Mary's first fiance ?
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 05:56 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bordertown, Australia
Posts: 76
|
|
|
The first child was named Edward after Prince Albert Victor (Eddy) as his father wished. The second child was named Albert as per Queen Victoria's wishes that a child from each family bear the name of her late husband.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 06:02 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,588
|
|
|
Albert Victor per se was a remembrence to Queen Victoria and Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Nearly all of Victoria's grandchildren and greatgrandchildren beared at least one of these names in their full christian names. Lord Louis Mountbattens christian name for example: Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas of Battenberg.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 06:26 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,588
|
|
Albert is indeed a beautiful name, as Victoria and Victor are as well.  I always wondered a bit what would've been if Mary had married Eddie. I think they were much more different characters than George and Mary were.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 06:34 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 2,406
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia
Queen Mary's first boy was called Edward and the second Albert ( future Georges VI).
Was is a remember of Mary's first fiance ?
|
Within the family the future Edward VIII/Duke of Windsor was known as David.
__________________
|

09-07-2009, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, United States
Posts: 123
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia
Queen Mary's first boy was called Edward and the second Albert ( future Georges VI).
Was is a remember of Mary's first fiance ?
|
Queen Mary and George V decided to name King George VI, Albert to appease Queen Victoria since he was born on the anniversary of her husband's death * oops *
__________________
" This coupe is too small! Go back and get the family carriage"
|

09-07-2009, 08:58 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,588
|
|
|
Do we know anything about Eddie's feelings for Mary? Maybe through letters?
__________________
|

09-08-2009, 06:09 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bordertown, Australia
Posts: 76
|
|
|
After the engagement was announced Prince Albert Victor wrote to his aunt Princess Louise and her husband the Marquess of Lorne-
"I wonder if you were surprised when you saw that I was engaged? I daresay you were, for I must say I made up my mind rather suddenly, which I think however was the best thing after all, and it is really time that I thought of getting married, if I ever am to be. Anyway, it is now settled at last, and I think I have done well in my choice, for I feel certain May will make an excellent wife, and you may be certain that I shall do my best to make her a good husband. Your affectionate old nephew Eddy".
__________________
|

09-08-2009, 06:49 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,588
|
|
Thank you for the quote, Roderick! Doesn't sound like a love-story, but I knew before that it was more an arranged engagement. Mary was quite passed around IMO.
__________________
|

09-08-2009, 07:40 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 9,846
|
|
|
I hardly think passed around is a term I would use.
Mary was familiar with both Wales boys and actually took some time to grieve before agreeing to marry George. It turns out that it was a good match as they (King George V and Queen Mary) were quite devoted to each other. Sometimes things happen for a reason.
|

09-08-2009, 07:53 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,588
|
|
Well, you shouldn't weigh up every word, dear Zonk.  I know I have sometimes a bit of a sharp tongue but I never mean any offence by it. And I know it were very different times and very different society circles. I'm happy for Mary that it all turned well with George in later times! They were a good match IMO.
Its just a bit strange from today's view and it came through my mind when I read the quote from Eddie's letter. I have a feeling, George really was the better husband for Mary (not because of the letter but from what I've read and heard about Eddie's and George's characters).
__________________
|

09-12-2009, 06:10 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
|
|
|
I think that "passed around" is a pretty good description of how Mary was treated. The senior royals decided that Mary was good marriage material, and just because one engagement didn't work, that doesn't mean she wasn't still a good candidate.
It seems cruel and inhumane in this day and age, but the whole function of royal women in a hereditary monarchy was (and still is?) to get married and have children. Mary knew that and I think pretty much accepted it.
If Eddy had become king, what do people think he would have styled himself as: Albert I, Victor I, or Edward VIII?
__________________
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|