The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 03-30-2009, 07:38 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,692
Lines of Descent

IMO, nothing compared to having an ancester famous for chopping off his wives' heads, and not going to jail for them.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2009, 07:46 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incas View Post
IMO, nothing compared to having an ancester famous for chopping off his wives' heads, and not going to jail for them.
Who is descended from him?

He had only three legitimate descendents who all died without legitimate issue and I have been unable to locate any descendents of his illegitimate children.

Certainly, as far as my research goes no member of the British royal family are descendents from such a person (assuming you are referring to Henry VIII).
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2009, 08:40 PM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Courtier
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 952
No legitimate descendants definitely, but if you buy into some historians' theories that Catherine Carey, mother of Lettice Knollys (who is a descendant of Diana, Princess of Wales), was actually the daughter of Henry VIII, there could be an illegitimate connection.
__________________

"I have to be seen to be believed."
HM The Queen
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:19 AM
Lady Ann's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: IN THE CITY, United States
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Who is descended from him?

He had only three legitimate descendents who all died without legitimate issue and I have been unable to locate any descendents of his illegitimate children.

Certainly, as far as my research goes no member of the British royal family are descendents from such a person (assuming you are referring to Henry VIII).
Wiki says HM Queen Elizabeth II is descended from The House of Tudor therefore, wouldn't William also be??? I get your point where as they are not descended from Elizabeth I, Mary I, Or Edward VI, but some how they are all still ancesters which is what was stated in the first place .. I am not sure if this is how but Henry VIII's mother was Elizabeth of York daughter of Edward IV. I don't know but they all tie in somewhere I thought maybe this could be where ...

Through Victoria, as well as several other of her great-great-grandparents, Elizabeth is directly descended from many British royals: from the House of Stuart, from Mary Queen of Scots,Robert the Bruce, and earlier Scottish royal houses; from the House of Tudor and earlier English royal houses stretching back as far as the 7th century House of Wessex.
__________________
Lady Ann
Life began with waking up and loving my mother's face…~ George Eliot ~
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2009, 03:04 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,189
Ancestry of Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prince William of Wales - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
x
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-31-2009, 03:55 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
He had only three legitimate descendents who all died without legitimate issue and I have been unable to locate any descendents of his illegitimate children.
No I wasn't referring to blood descendant, only in the historical sense of Henry VIII being a King of England and William as an heir-in-waiting for the same.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-31-2009, 03:58 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Ann View Post
Wiki says HM Queen Elizabeth II is descended from The House of Tudor therefore, wouldn't William also be??? I get your point where as they are not descended from Elizabeth I, Mary I, Or Edward VI, but some how they are all still ancesters which is what was stated in the first place .. I am not sure if this is how but Henry VIII's mother was Elizabeth of York daughter of Edward IV. I don't know but they all tie in somewher I thought maybe this could be were ...

Through Victoria, as well as several other of her great-great-grandparents, Elizabeth is directly descended from many British royals: from the House of Stuart, from Mary Queen of Scots,Robert the Bruce, and earlier Scottish royal houses; from the House of Tudor and earlier English royal houses stretching back as far as the 7th century House of Wessex.
The present Queen, Charles, William etc are all descendents of Henry VII, through his daughter Margaret, not descendents of Henry VIII.

Margaret married James IV of Scotland. Her son was James V of Scotland and his daughter was Mary, Queen of Scots. Her son was James VI of Scotland who became James I of England. From him the line to the present Queen doesn't go through his son and the rest of the Stuart monarchs but through his daughter Elizabeth whose youngest daughter was Sophia of Hanover, mother of George I.

Thus the present royals are descendents of the first of the Tudor monarchs and first of the Stuart monarchs but not through other Tudors or Stuarts. Of course William will be a descendent of Charles II through his mother Diana, who is a descendent through one or more of Charles' illegitmate children.

TUDOR descent to the start of the STUARTS - Henry VII, Elizabeth, James IV, James V, Mary I of Scotland, James VI and I
STUARTS to the present Queen - James I and VI, Elizabeth of Bohemia, Sophia of Hanover, George I, George II, Frederick, Prince of Wales, George III, Edward, Duke of Kent, Victoria, Edward VII, George V, George VI, Elizabeth II.

Since Henry VII - the following monarchs are not ancestors of the present Queen - Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I of England, Elizabeth I, Charles I, Charles II, James II (and VII), Mary II and William III, Anne, George IV, William IV and Edward VIII.

So since Henry VII there have been 22 monarchs and Elizabeth is descended from 9 of them. (1 Tudor, 1 Stuart, first three Georges, Victoria and her successors except Edward VIII).

As Henry VIII's children had no children they have no descendents and therefore are the ancestors of no one.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:08 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella Kay View Post
No legitimate descendants definitely, but if you buy into some historians' theories that Catherine Carey, mother of Lettice Knollys (who is a descendant of Diana, Princess of Wales), was actually the daughter of Henry VIII, there could be an illegitimate connection.
I am going to be picky here but as far as I am aware Diana, Princess of Wales only has two descendents - William and Harry.

I think you mean ancestor.

Diana may very well be a descendent of an illegitimate line from Henry VIII, which is why I was using the word legitimate.

As there is only a theory, which presumably means that Henry didn't acknowledge the child, then there is no evidence to support that claim. Many British people claim descent through illegitmate lines from kings because the wife made the claim that the king was the father rather than admit an affair with the appropriate penalties that a husband could apply to a straying wife. In ancient times the wife/woman claimed to have been impregnated by a god, in the middle ages, depending on the rank of the woman, the claim was a man higher in the social scale and thus unable to be attacked by the husband/father if woman unmarried. A peasant woman would claim the lord of the manor, a lord's wife/daughter would claim his overlord etc up the chain. Thus I don't put a lot of credence in claims that aren't substantiated or acknowledged by the father.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:35 PM
Lady Ann's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: IN THE CITY, United States
Posts: 857
The present Queen, Charles, William etc are all descendents of Henry VII, through his daughter Margaret, not descendents of Henry VIII.


Yes after I posted I read futher into is an relized it was his sister Maraget was the conncetion. Thank you for all your information. Question if you will why is Henry the VII ancestes to then and not henry vIII?
__________________
Lady Ann
Life began with waking up and loving my mother's face…~ George Eliot ~
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-31-2009, 05:55 PM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Courtier
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I am going to be picky here but as far as I am aware Diana, Princess of Wales only has two descendents - William and Harry.

I think you mean ancestor.
Yes, I did -- a simple mistake. I think the meaning was clear regardless.
__________________

"I have to be seen to be believed."
HM The Queen
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-31-2009, 07:22 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Ann View Post
The present Queen, Charles, William etc are all descendents of Henry VII, through his daughter Margaret, not descendents of Henry VIII.


Yes after I posted I read futher into is an relized it was his sister Maraget was the conncetion. Thank you for all your information. Question if you will why is Henry the VII ancestes to then and not henry vIII?

Because they are descendents of Henry VII's daughter not his son.

Think of it this way - you are a descendent of your parents but you are not a descendent of your uncles/aunts. Your siblings are also descendents of your parents. Your children are your descendents but they aren't descendents of your brother/s or sister/s. However the children of your siblings, like your children, are descendents of your parents.

Henry VII was the father of both Henry VII and Margaret and thus all their descendents are descendents of his but Margaret's children aren't descendents of her brother. They are, however, descendents of her father because she is a descendent of her father. Her descendents are related to her brother but not descended from him as they didn't come from him (only his own children are his descendents).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-05-2009, 11:35 AM
HM Queen Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rendsburg, Germany
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Who is descended from him?

He had only three legitimate descendents who all died without legitimate issue and I have been unable to locate any descendents of his illegitimate children.

Certainly, as far as my research goes no member of the British royal family are descendents from such a person (assuming you are referring to Henry VIII).
The hand-written date of the marriage of Francis Knollys and Catherine Carey and the births of their children, found in Francis' Latin dictionary, does seem to support the fact that Catherine was conceived during the time of Henry's affair with Mary Boleyn.

According to historical record, it also shows grants and favors made to Sir William Carey just before and after the birth of Catherine. As King, Henry VIII would have seen no use in acknowledging a bastard daughter, especially when the mother was already respectably married and he was losing interest in the affair, in favor of his affair with her sister Anne.

Whether Henry Carey, 1st Baron Hunsdon, was his son seems debatable. Henry was younger than Catherine, and he was rumored to be the King's son and bore a resemblance to him and to Queen Elizabeth. At the time the rumors surfaced, they were said to have been started by those supporting Queen Catherine (of Aragon). If that is the case, then there must have been some grain of truth to the rumors. Spreading lies would have served no political purpose to Catherine's supporters or her cause.

What is definitely known, is that both Catherine Carey and her brother Henry, were very much confidants of Queen Elizabeth, and held high positions of honor in her household. Both of them were trusted members of her court and never came under any suspicion of disloyalty, nor did they ever fall from her favor.

In fact, when Catherine Carey died, the Queen not only mourned her deeply, but paid over 400 British pounds for her funeral, an extreme sum in those days. She even offered Henry Carey an earldom, which he refused, but one of his sons was made Earl of Monmouth and one of Catherine's sons was ennobled as the Earl of Banbury.

Henry Carey's illegitimate son was the Bishop of Exeter, and his daughters married well too, Philadelphia becoming Lady Scrope of Bolton, Catherine was the Countess of Nottingham, and Mary was Lady Edward Hoby.

Of course, Catherine's daughters also did well; Lettice becoming the Countess of Essex and Leicester, Elizabeth was Lady Thomas Leighton of Feckenham, Anne was the Lady de la Warr, and Catherine was the Lady Offaly in Ireland.

If Catherine Carey is ever finally determined to be the illegitimate daughter of Henry VIII, which it appears she was, then I will be one of his many direct descendants. She was my 12th great-grandmother.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2009, 09:33 PM
Queen_of_Hearts's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abington, United States
Posts: 1
I have Norfolk connections, which ties me to the Careys, but I'm a distant cousin of Anne Boleyn and Queen Elizabeth I.
__________________
Queen of Hearts
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2009, 05:51 PM
king of scotland's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orkney, United Kingdom
Posts: 27
Elizabeth II is somehow related to every monarch of Post William I England, starting with William the Conqueror who is her 22nd Great-Grandfather. She could trace her ancestry back to Cerdic, the first King of Wessex. Not all of them are direct such as King Henry VIII is her 12th Great-Granduncle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_...o_Elizabeth_II
__________________
My favorite Royals, are Prince William, Princess Eugenie, Lady Louise, and Prince Philip.

"A gun is no more dangerous than a cricket bat in the hands of a madman."
- Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-20-2009, 10:53 PM
CarolinaLandgrave's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 368
(8) Any two people with even a drop of English blood are probably at least as close as 30th cousin to each other. It is estimated that anyone with English blood has better than a 99.9% chance of being descended from Edward III, who lived through the black death. He is known to have many descendants in the first few generations at the same time most of his countrymen were dying of plague. The estimate is derived from using known rates of marriage, children, and cousin marriages in later eras.

Does this extend to those of us who descent from the Anglo-Norman families also? What an interesting bit of info..... my interests lies with my great-great-great-great-great grandfather, John Bruce. He was born in Edinburgh in 1757 and immigrated to South Carolina in 1770/71.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-26-2009, 06:34 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
(7) Kate Middleton's family history is not well documented in the 18th century. She may be a descendant of Mary Boleyn. William is descended from both children of Mary Boleyn. Of course, both children are suspected of being fathered by Henry the 8th. If she does become Queen, I suspect that some graves will be interred to do DNA testing.

I can see it now, engagement announced and grave digging commences that night!! Just imagine what a newspaper like The Sun or News of the World would do with that!! I love the silliness of the whole thing!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-02-2009, 05:00 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Las Vegas, United States
Posts: 103
Quote:
Does this extend to those of us who descent from the Anglo-Norman families also? What an interesting bit of info..... my interests lies with my great-great-great-great-great grandfather, John Bruce. He was born in Edinburgh in 1757 and immigrated to South Carolina in 1770/71.
Caroline, you probably are descended from Edward I, II, or III. The time span between their lives and the time you ancestor John Bruce was over 4 centuries.

I am not just pulling these numbers out of my keister. They are the result of some serious study in geneology. I have corresponded with some of the research and shared some of my own work.

Quote:
I can see it now, engagement announced and grave digging commences that night!! Just imagine what a newspaper like The Sun or News of the World would do with that!! I love the silliness of the whole thing!
lac2003. It may seem silly, but I have no doubt that the gravedigging will commence once the engagement is announced. Like I said the family connection between every monarch and their spouse was well known (except Anne Hyde and Wallis Simpson). Curiousity will get the best of people. In Kate Middleton's case, I believe that only one or two graves will need to be exhumed. There is a critical link that they are unsure of. They won't need to dig up whole cemeteries.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-03-2009, 11:37 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacomartin View Post
... I believe that only one or two graves will need to be exhumed. There is a critical link that they are unsure of. They won't need to dig up whole cemeteries.
The amount of red tape they would have to go through, the permissions that would have to be sought (all living descendants that would have to be notified), the chances of nobody objecting would be remote. Were they buried in a single plot each, has it been reused, will it disturb any other graves, will the law allow it, the church etc. The resultant publicity would preclude any such action, IMO.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-31-2009, 07:38 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Las Vegas, United States
Posts: 103
I believe that there is a generally accepted lineage that places that makes Kate a 21xg-granddaughter of Edward III. It has been traced through her (14xg-) great-grandmother, who lived in the early 16th century, Anne Gascoigne Fairfax. This is virtually no suprise since it is estimated that over 99.9% of people with English blood are descended from Edward III. Being English and being descended from the Edwards is virtually synonymous.
---------------
The critical link that would tie Kate Middleton to the Tudors and the Boleyns is the suspicion that her 7xg-grandfather William Davenport (d. 1723) is the son born in 1679 at Worfield in Shropshire to Henry Davenport of Hollon and his wife Elizabeth Talbot. That would establish a much closer link between her and the royal family.
-------------
Of course it all is kind of silly. Logically every two people have a millions or billions of common ancestors. Does it really matter if Kate and Williams most recent common ancestor lived in the 14th century or the 17th century? However, it is one of the oldest obsessions in the world, since geneologies are some of the earliest known writings of man.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-31-2009, 08:24 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Las Vegas, United States
Posts: 103
Prince William of Wales has 2,925 known bloodlines that go back to Edward III that range from 20 to 27 generations. There are 1,934 bloodlines through his father, and 991 through his mother (1934+991=2925). The mathematics of ancestry gets very complex as you keep tracing back to multiple generations. You can only inbreed so far before genetic disease kills you. That's why it is estimated that Edward III has 100 million living descendants alive today.
---------
This bloodline is probably the best known, because over half it's members are sovereigns. It would make Edward his 21g-grandfather.
{ G } Name (Regal #)
{ 0 } Prince William
{ 1 } Prince Charles
{ 2 } Elizabeth II
{ 3 } George VI
{ 4 } George V
{ 5 } Edward VII
{ 6 } Victoria
{ 7 } Edward
{ 8 } George III
{ 9 } Frederick
{ 10 } George II
{ 11 } George I
{ 12 } Sophia
{ 13 } Elizabeth Stuart
{ 14 } James I / James VI
{ 15 } Mary Queen of Scots
{ 16 } James V
{ 17 } Margaret Tudor
{ 18 } Henry VII
{ 19 } Margaret Beaufort
{ 20 } John Beaufort
{ 21 } John Beaufort
{ 22 } John of Gaunt
{ 23 } Edward III
===============
It is also why the idea expressed in the DaVinci Code that Jesus could have a single living descendant alive today is statistically just one step short of impossible. Of anyone from the year zero has a descendant alive today, he is more than likely the ancestor of a large majority of the people on the planet on all the continents. Most scientists think that there is a person who lived as early as 2000-5000 years ago that is in the ancestry of every single living human being alive today. The statistical likelihood favors 2000 years ago.

__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
European Royals of North, Central and/or South American Descent (excluding Brazil) Quin Royalty Past, Present, and Future 8 12-03-2006 09:07 PM




Popular Tags
abdication belgium birth brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events fashion genealogy germany grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king constantine ii king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympic games ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland pregnancy president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen anne-marie queen fabiola queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding william



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]