The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #201  
Old 10-05-2017, 02:42 PM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 534
LOL, I wonder how they would have figured that out, would some poor sap be dispatched to query the newly-widowed, fifty-one year old dowager?

Actually I think the Queen's proclamation did take place on February 6, the same date her father died, but the public proclamation happened a couple days later after Elizabeth returned to England from Kenya
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 10-05-2017, 03:05 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsaritsa View Post
I read, and it may VERY well be apocryphal, that there was a delay in proclaiming Elizabeth as Queen until it was certain that the Queen Mother wasn't pregnant! I offer no opinion on this.
I read it too; in "Royal Romances. Titillating Tales of Passion and Power in the Palaces of Europe" by Leslie Carroll.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 10-05-2017, 04:17 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCBadger View Post
I've also read that. I believe it was in the book "Royal Feud."
YES!!! Indeed it was. Well done and thank-you to both you and Biri for reassuring me that I'm not losing it...............yet.
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 10-05-2017, 10:25 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 595
Lady? Colin Campbell was married for about 15 minutes in the 60s or 70s to Campbell, but she has been using that name ever since. She? has always been on Wallis’s side against the royal family. I wouldnt believe her if she said the sky was blue and the grass was green.
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 10-05-2017, 11:17 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,045
A few points:

Elizabeth was proclaimed Queen in London and Edinburgh on the 6th February.

She didn't take the oath in person until a few days later as she had to return from Kenya.

It wouldn't have mattered if the Queen Mum had been pregnant. The UK is never without a monarch so if she was then Elizabeth would have been Queen until the new child was born (no way of telling the gender of the baby in the womb back then) at which point Elizabeth would have abdicated in favour of her brother and then been Regent until he turned 18.

Lady Colin Campbell - like all other divorced wives in the UK - is entitled to continue to use her husband's name/title just as Diana and Sarah continued to do after their divorces.

The jewels that the various royal ladies have will be either part of the Royal Collection, in which case, they will always be part of the royal family as they belong to the nation; currently in the personal use of the given royal but destined for the Royal Collection on the death of the present user e.g. some of the jewels Sophie was given in the Middle East are hers to use in her lifetime but they they go into the Royal Collection with the expectation that either Louise or James' wife will wear it and then the granddaughter/s who knew Sophie; the third set is that that belongs to the royal personally and forms part of their estate and so can be sold but also has to be valued for death duties as well.
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 10-06-2017, 10:54 AM
duchessrachel's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by padams2359 View Post
Lady? Colin Campbell was married for about 15 minutes in the 60s or 70s to Campbell, but she has been using that name ever since. She? has always been on Wallis’s side against the royal family. I wouldnt believe her if she said the sky was blue and the grass was green.
I almost put quote marks around Lady in my previous post.
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 10-06-2017, 11:20 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,711
But would it be possible that the Queen Mother would have gotten pregnant NATURALLY (and in such an age) if she needed artificial insemination to have Queen Elizabeth and Princess Margaret?
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 10-06-2017, 12:01 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,720
Who said she needed artificial insemination? Oh yes, Kitty Kelley, whose book on the royals had so many errors I noted a dozen in the first couple of chapters, and also, guess who, Lady C again!

By the way, I was reading George VI's bio by Bradford last night and Elizabeth had Margaret naturally, at Glamis, after a six hour labour. No ceasarian.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 10-06-2017, 12:10 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,711
Didn't then exist the rule: "Once a Caesarean, ALWAYS a Caesarean"?
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 10-06-2017, 12:44 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,720
In those days I think they played it by ear if things seemed to be going well, rather than subject the expectant mother to a quite serious operation.

The announcement at the time of Princess Elizabeth's birth was that 'a certain line of treatment had been successfully adopted'. That birth had been induced and perhaps labour was not progressing.

Margaret's birth being a natural one is in Shawcross, and the obstetrician assisting, Frank Reynolds, wrote to his wife of 'everything going smoothly without any trouble'.
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 10-07-2017, 06:22 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Edward has only allegedly had illegitimate children - none were acknowledged or ever verified in any way
Yes I know. I merely pointed out that it was specualative, that mumps had made him sterile and that there are also rumours that he did father a child or 2.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 10-08-2017, 05:27 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
In those days I think they played it by ear if things seemed to be going well, rather than subject the expectant mother to a quite serious operation.


Margaret's birth being a natural one is in Shawcross, and the obstetrician assisting, Frank Reynolds, wrote to his wife of 'everything going smoothly without any trouble'.
OH I thought they were boht caesarians....
But certainly they didn't want to have too many of them, I think the rule was no more than 2 or 3.. so that may account for them not trying for a boy...
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 10-08-2017, 05:28 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by duchessrachel View Post
I almost put quote marks around Lady in my previous post.
She is entitled to use the title "Lady Colin Campbell"..
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 10-08-2017, 08:54 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post

Margaret's birth being a natural one is in Shawcross, and the obstetrician assisting, Frank Reynolds, wrote to his wife of 'everything going smoothly without any trouble'.
Maybe he had in mind "The operation went without complications"? (No heamorrage, no infection, no uterine rupture, etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 10-08-2017, 09:32 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,720
It was 'after a six hour labour' that Margaret was born. (In Shawcross, the authorised biography which is fully footnoted.) You don't have a six hour labour, with everything 'going smoothly without any trouble' and then perform a ceasarian operation. There is no mention of a ceasarian operation in the account of Prss Margaret's birth.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 10-13-2017, 07:17 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 59
Is it true that George VI was prone to fits of rage?
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 10-13-2017, 07:26 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,720
Several royals were and are hot-tempered at times, including George. His tempers were referred to as 'gnashes' by his family. However, for most of the time he was quite even tempered. I wouldn't be surprised if some of his 'gnashes' were caused by frustrations over his stammer.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 10-13-2017, 08:57 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,840
Sounds like a reasonable explanation. You are right about the family "temper" though, many have been noted as being short-tempered. I imagine living in a fishbowl even within your own home must be extremely frustrating at times.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 10-13-2017, 09:02 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Several royals were and are hot-tempered at times, including George. His tempers were referred to as 'gnashes' by his family. However, for most of the time he was quite even tempered. I wouldn't be surprised if some of his 'gnashes' were caused by frustrations over his stammer.
Margaret probably got her moody behaviour from him.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 10-13-2017, 09:08 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,720
George was never seen as a particularly moody person. I think David could be more fairly described as that.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
biography, british history, duke of york, elizabeth bowes-lyon, george vi, pictures, queen elizabeth, queen elizabeth the queen mother, queen mother, royal navy, windsor, world war ii


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George IV (1762-1830) and Caroline of Brunswick (1768-1821) tiaraprin British Royal History 55 10-22-2017 04:04 PM
King George V (1865-1936) elenaris British Royal History 169 10-02-2017 02:51 PM
George III (1738-1820) and Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (1744-1818) Lady Jennifer British Royal History 104 01-31-2017 02:24 AM
Princess Marie (1876-1940), later Grand Duchess Maria Georgievna of Russia George Greek Royal History 23 10-22-2016 08:56 PM
George I (1660-1727) and Sophia Dorothea of Celle (1666-1726) HMTLove23 British Royal History 45 10-19-2016 09:15 AM




Popular Tags
best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events cymry denmark duchess of brabant earl of snowdon fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia italy iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein lord snowdon monarchy news picture of the week prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess mary princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania casual outfit queen silvia soderberg spanish royal family state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge casual wear victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises