The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #501  
Old 05-31-2017, 01:58 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,291
Another episode in the saga of "royals behaving badly" that I'd not heard of before. I had read that Edward VII was hardly "mama's angel" and there were quite a few disreputable fine messes that he got into and this just adds to it.

I guess no matter who you are or where you come from, position and prestige doesn't excuse bad behavior by a long shot.
__________________

__________________
I dream of a better tomorrow, where chickens can cross the road and not be questioned about their motives.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 05-31-2017, 05:06 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,555
Defamation/libel are still big issues today. What lead to the accusation of cheating will always be a bit unclear given the way the events unfolded but it wasn't so much the gambling or playing cards that was the issue but the accusations of cheating that lead to the court case and brought it into the public domain.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 06-03-2017, 03:18 AM
Furienna's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
Posts: 1,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I guess no matter who you are or where you come from, position and prestige doesn't excuse bad behavior by a long shot.
Yes, but Bertie had to learn that the hard way. Even if most people today haven't Heard about this particular scandal, his reputation was almost ruined by it at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 06-03-2017, 05:40 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,021
His reputation wasn't ruined. It didn't do him any good, certainly.. he got involved in a lot of silly behaviour that led to scandals, but his positon DID save him from "ruination". I think a lot of people felt that he did get into stupid situatons because he hadn't enough to do, and the queen kept him out of serious business.
Reply With Quote
  #505  
Old 06-03-2017, 07:42 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 3,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
Oh good lord. Edward slept around because he wanted to. Most men would like to, and he had the opportunity to have loads of women. His wealth and social position and lack of a serious job meant that he had plenty of time and energy and money to spend on pursuit of pleasure.
I don't think it had antying to do with "anger against women"...or that his women were "masculine looking".
He and Alix were fond of each other, but they had married very young and had done so because they were both royal and had to get married.. As a newspaper said at the time there were only about 7 women at that juncture that Ed could marry, so he was lucky that he got one who was nice and charming and very lovely and who appealed to him.. They didn't have much in common esp as Alix got deaf and retired to her home life and over devoted herself to her children. But he loved her.. even if she bored him..
He was fooling around well before she got deaf.. -
I think that she was rather possessive, because that was her nature, she clung to the children.. and she was rather resentful at times of the fact that Edward wanted more amusmetn than she could give him and that he was so VERY unfaithful..
So they had rows and bad times like the best of couples do, and since she could not (and wouldn't want to.. as I don't think she was that sexy) have an affair herself, she hit back, by being rather tiresome (which only drove Edward to spend more time away) and then she would take off for Denmark, to spent more time with her own family (who also bored Edward).. I think that this was a bit of a punishment because it sometimes caused gossip in the papers and he might get a ticking off from his mother for upsetting his wife.
Their marriage was far from perfect, but it was problaby better than a lot of marriages...

Edward's and Alexandra's marriage seems pretty typical of other arranged royal marriages at the time. Nothing really odd in context.

I am far more interested in Edward VII's (controversial) role in foreign policy than in his private sex life. His francophilia and anti-German sentiments (shared BTW by Alexandra for obvious reasons) , in a time when monarchs still had far more influence on government policy, were a relevant factor in the run-up to WWI, which is quite ironic really considering that both Edward and Alexandra were of German ancestry.

Compared to Edward VII, George V , who reigned during the war, distanced himself from politics and was far more subservient to his ministers.
Reply With Quote
  #506  
Old 06-07-2017, 04:47 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,021
It was a different time, by the time George V came to the throne. THe last little bit of "royal influence" had gone.. and in any case George dlsiked foreigers and wasn't someone who enjoyed travelling and mixing with people from differnet places, as his father did. So he wasn't likely to have opinions in the field of foreign affairs. (hmm! rather Freudian there).
And I agree, Edwards marriage and his sex life were similar to most royal men or upper class men at the time.. He married Alix because it was his duty to marry and he was fond of her.. but he didn't feel obliged to be faithful.
Reply With Quote
  #507  
Old 06-07-2017, 05:05 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,669
Edward VII's Francophilia, if not his anti-Germanic feelings, began very early however and were personal. As a young boy he had fallen for the Empress Eugenie and Napoleaon III who were very nice to him when he and his sister Vicky had accompanied their parents on a State visit to France. He hadn't wanted to leave, and that was the beginning of his life-long love affair with Paris and with the French.

Conversely, Edward very much disliked his nephew, the bumptious and vainglorious Kaiser Wilhelm, mostly for the way that individual had treated his mother, Edward's sister, as well as the fact that Willie lost no opportunity to emphasise that he had become an Emperor at the time his uncle was still only Prince of Wales.

He was not alone in his dislike of Wilhelm. Many of his relatives couldn't stand him, including Alix. There was also mistrust of the Germans wanting their 'place in the sun' that Wilhelm was forever trumpeting. So, in Edward's case, personal bias was intertwined with his views on other countries.
Reply With Quote
  #508  
Old 06-08-2017, 10:00 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 185
How did Queen Alexandra and the Princess of Wales get along? A lot of fighting over jewels and sharing the spotlight?
Reply With Quote
  #509  
Old 06-08-2017, 05:57 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 633
I'm sure QM saw her for the overbearing mother that she was.
Reply With Quote
  #510  
Old 06-08-2017, 07:24 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,669
Queen Alexandra could never quite let any of her adult children go. She and her household from the big house at Sandringham visited York Cottage in the grounds quite a lot during George and Mary's honeymoon. She said to Mary (in a kindly way I'm sure) 'Of course you must call me Motherdear, and come to me for everything', but 'of course' Mary didn't! George once answered a letter of his wife's talking about his mother and father with 'Mother is the most selfish person I know'. Which, considering how he adored her was quite a statement!

Mary's relationship with at least one of George's sisters, the bitchy and anti-intellectual Victoria, who would make fun of her cultural interests, was also quite strained. However, Mary did make allowances for her mother in law's deafness and loneliness, praised her good qualities, and there was never any open split or quarrel between the two of them.

Mary knew Alexandra and Edward spoiled their grandchildren to death and were overindulgent, especially Alexandra, but she and George still left them with them at Sandringham for quite a long time when they went on tour abroad.
Reply With Quote
  #511  
Old 06-10-2017, 03:59 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronprinz View Post
How did Queen Alexandra and the Princess of Wales get along? A lot of fighting over jewels and sharing the spotlight?
Not at all, as far as I know. fighting over jewels and sharing the spotilight?? Its not Dallas.
Reply With Quote
  #512  
Old 06-10-2017, 04:03 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Queen Alexandra could never quite let any of her adult children go. She and her household from the big house at Sandringham visited York Cottage in the grounds quite a lot during George and Mary's honeymoon. She said to Mary (in a kindly way I'm sure) 'Of course you must call me Motherdear, and come to me for everything', but 'of course' Mary didn't! George once answered a letter of his wife's talking about his mother and father with 'Mother is the most selfish person I know'. Which, considering how he adored her was quite a statement!

abroad.
Alix was a possessive person, esp as a mother. however, she was essentially a likable woman.. even if selfish in a childish way. And I think her children loved her, even when she was exasperating. Victoria had the most reason to be cross with her because she kept her a companion and would not let her marry. However at the time the idea of a "spinster daughter looking after Mother" was pretty common and was nto regarded as quite as selfish as it mihgt seem nowadays.
I agree that Q Mary did not always get on perfectly with her in laws, who does, but that she got on with them quite well and there were no "big rows" or cat fighting. She was royal and knew the etiquette and knew how to treat her mother in law, the Queen with suitable respect.
Reply With Quote
  #513  
Old 12-21-2017, 03:32 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 3,858
Queen Alexandra attended the West Norfolk Hunt Dog Show and presented prizes in 1922.
Reply With Quote
  #514  
Old 01-11-2018, 07:53 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 185
Is it true that Queen Alexandra demanded to have precedence over Queen Mary at Edward VII's funeral?

She also appeared to be sort of slow in moving out of Buckingham Palace, leaving only in early 1911.
Reply With Quote
  #515  
Old 01-11-2018, 08:01 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 633
I think the consort of the deceased monarch should have precedence at the funeral of her king, then never again.
Reply With Quote
  #516  
Old 01-11-2018, 08:12 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronprinz View Post
Is it true that Queen Alexandra demanded to have precedence over Queen Mary at Edward VII's funeral?

She also appeared to be sort of slow in moving out of Buckingham Palace, leaving only in early 1911.
She was encouraged by her sister - the Dowager Empress of Russia - as that was the tradition in Russia.

Mary didn't want a fuss and so allowed it although in the UK the precedence changed instantly Edward VII died.

One of the scenes I find interesting in the first season of The Crown was when the Queen Mother stopped Margaret from following Elizabeth down the corridor giving Philip that precedence even though he was only a Prince (in fact the Queen had to issue a statement to give him that precedence which she did so that he took precedence immediately after herself, except when specified in law - which actually related to the taking of seats in the House of Lords where Charles, as Duke of Cornwall would automatically take precedence over his father).

As things currently stand, if Philip were to survive The Queen, he wouldn't be the chief mourner at the funeral. That would be Charles - as was seen in 1936 when George V died and Edward VIII was the chief mourner, not Queen Mary and again in 1952 when Elizabeth II was the chief mourner not the Queen Mother and so Philip lead the funeral procession at George VI's funeral and not one of his brothers.
Reply With Quote
  #517  
Old 01-12-2018, 04:02 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,021
I doubt if Alexandra DEMANDED it, she problaby expected it, as his widow.. and Q Mary allowed it as it was her mourning her husband and her last time as first lady. When Alix became queen herself, I understand that she refused to allow people to give her full "royal treatment" in private until Q Victoria had been buried.. because she wanted to treat her late Mohter in law with the utmost respect...
Reply With Quote
  #518  
Old 01-12-2018, 12:57 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
As things currently stand, if Philip were to survive The Queen, he wouldn't be the chief mourner at the funeral. That would be Charles - as was seen in 1936 when George V died and Edward VIII was the chief mourner, not Queen Mary and again in 1952 when Elizabeth II was the chief mourner not the Queen Mother and so Philip lead the funeral procession at George VI's funeral and not one of his brothers.
Hmm I think the Queen gave precedence to her mother at George VI's funeral.

At least from the videos of the casket arriving in London and again on the arrival at St George's Chapel, you can see the Queen Mother leading the procession.
Reply With Quote
  #519  
Old 01-12-2018, 03:24 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 3,858
King Edward VII laid the foundation stone at Dartmouth Naval College.
Reply With Quote
  #520  
Old 01-21-2018, 09:07 PM
duchessrachel's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 537
I am about to read a book on Queen Alexandra by Georgina Battiscombe. On the inside cover in the synopsis of the book, it says that Edward VII and Alexandra's was a true love story and that he only started cheating on her when she became reclusive after having rheumatic fever. Is that true? I just finished reading "Edward the Caresser" by Stanley Weintraub, but it did not strike me from that book that there relationship was a great love story at the beginning. However, that book didn't really spend enough time on their relationship for me to understand how the first few years of there marriage was. Anyway, I am just wondering if this is a true statement that he was faithful to her up until her rheumatic fever because, if it is not, I don't want to waste my time reading it.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
biography, british history, edward vii, hesse-cassel, pictures, prince of wales, princess of wales, queen alexandra, queen consort, queen victoria, queen victoria's children, saxe-coburg-gotha


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence, eldest son of Edward VII (1864-1892) tiaraprin British Royal History 203 04-15-2018 06:24 AM
Princess Victoria ("Toria"), daughter of Edward VII & Queen Alexandra (1868-1935) colynsmomma British Royal History 47 04-03-2014 09:16 PM
"Edward the King" [Edward VII] (1975) - ATV docudrama miniseries BeatrixFan The Electronic Domain 6 06-09-2012 08:55 AM
Ingrid - Queen of Denmark, born Princess of Sweden (1910-2000) Josefine Swedish Royal History 32 01-20-2011 04:48 AM




Popular Tags
books britishroyals camilla canada chris o'neill cristina crown princess victoria current events documentary duchess of cambridge eveningwear duchess of cambridge gala dress duchess of york family fashion general news grand duchess maria teresa grand duke jean guillaume hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta elena infanta leonor infanta margarita infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle news porphyria prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess estelle princess eugenie princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sibilla princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima quizz royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding spain spanish jewels state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family swedish royal registry the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge fashion victoria visit from spain wedding



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises