the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > British Royal History



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2009, 06:52 PM
iowabelle's Avatar
iowabelle iowabelle is offline
Royal Highness
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 2,341
Default

If you expand the definition of heir to include princes of the blood closely related to the monarch, you'll find that George III's brothers and sons also married Englishwomen or Scotswomen (brother the Duke of Gloucester married Maria Walpole, the Dowager Countess of Waldegrave; brother the Duke of Cumberland allegedly married Olive Wilmot and later Anne Horton -- this marriage inspired the Royal Marriages Act of 1772 to keep undesirables out of the family; and sons The Prince of Wales, Mrs. Fitzherbert; Duke of Clarence, later William IV, married Mrs. Jordan; Duke of Sussex, who married Lady Augusta Murray-- possibly Scottish in origin?-- and Lady Cecilia Buggin).

Admittedly, most of these marriages were made in violation of the Royal Marriages Act of 1772, and many of these involved a Catholic partner, so they were not generally recognized.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2009, 07:07 PM
HM Queen Catherine's Avatar
HM Queen Catherine HM Queen Catherine is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rendsburg, Germany
Posts: 58
Default

You're right Iowabelle, there were plenty of British women that married into the Royal Family by way of younger sons.

The original question/statement I was responding to, was specifically about the marriages of heirs apparent and/or reigning monarchs. George IV does fall within this category, since he married Maria FitzHerbert while he was still Prince of Wales.

Had their marriage been allowed, it would have changed history, and it was obvious that their love endured in spite of the dissolution of their marriage.

Last edited by Warren; 06-16-2009 at 11:13 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2009, 03:45 PM
Grace Angel's Avatar
Grace Angel Grace Angel is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iowa, United States
Posts: 458
Send a message via Yahoo to Grace Angel
Default

Did William IV and Mrs. Jordan ever legally marry? I know she was his mistress for many years, ansd basically his common law wife, but I don't recall that they ever legally married.

Last edited by Warren; 06-16-2009 at 11:13 AM. Reason: repeat
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2009, 06:30 PM
Iluvbertie Iluvbertie is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace Angel View Post
Did William IV and Mrs. Jordan ever legally marry? I know she was his mistress for many years, ansd basically his common law wife, but I don't recall that they ever legally married.

They never legally married.

To contract a legal marriage they would have needed the consent of George III or Parliament.

When William finally made a legal marriage (he had the consent of his brother, The Prince Regent) it was when it became a necessity to beget a successor for the throne and by then Mrs Jordan was past child bearing age and the children already born couldn't become heirs to the throne as they weren't the product of a legal marriage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2009, 04:06 PM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Ella Kay Ella Kay is offline
Courtier
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 867
Default

I don't think they ever married, though they produced many, many children (ten or more). I think I remember reading that George III was relatively blase about the relationship, but I don't think that William IV ever took steps to try to make her his wife instead of his mistress.
__________________
"I have to be seen to be believed."
HM The Queen

Royal Romance
Mad Hattery!
The Daily Kate
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2009, 06:52 PM
Grace Angel's Avatar
Grace Angel Grace Angel is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iowa, United States
Posts: 458
Send a message via Yahoo to Grace Angel
Default

Yes, I had thought they never went through any sort of ceremony. You can I suppose use the term common law wife to describe the role of Mrs. Jourdan in William IV's life, but she was basically a mistress more than anything.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2009, 04:40 PM
lac2003 lac2003 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
Default

Diana was actually more English than Charles. Camilla is more English than Charles. Nationality in the royal houses is pretty fluid. Victoria and Edward VII supposedly spoke with German accents, and the Hanovers before them certainly were German. The Duke of Edinburgh is a Greek Prince not a British one, but he's not Greek!
Oh, my husband, born and bred in Scotland, is a Scotsman. He's not Scotch, Scottish, or (heaven forbid!) British!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2009, 05:31 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,954
Default

He is both Scottish and British.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:17 AM
Wisteria's Avatar
Wisteria Wisteria is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maidenhead, United Kingdom
Posts: 286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lac2003 View Post
Oh, my husband, born and bred in Scotland, is a Scotsman. He's not Scotch, Scottish, or (heaven forbid!) British!!
I donīt want to go off subject but I canīt help remark on this Scot and Scotch adjective. Nowadays Scotch is only used for whisky but I have heard from my grandmother that when she was a young girl her grandfather, who came from Edinburgh, always referred to himself as Scotch and everything referring to his homeland as Scotch. When he did a tour of duty in Australia his son attended a school called Scotch College. Does that mean the Scottish adjective is just a fashion?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-08-2009, 11:34 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Mermaid1962 Mermaid1962 is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 2,212
Default

A professor of mine from Scotland (circa 1980) once said that Scottish was more of an English term for the Scots, but that Scotch was acceptable. Perhaps these terms do go in and out of fashion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisteria View Post
I donīt want to go off subject but I canīt help remark on this Scot and Scotch adjective. Nowadays Scotch is only used for whisky but I have heard from my grandmother that when she was a young girl her grandfather, who came from Edinburgh, always referred to himself as Scotch and everything referring to his homeland as Scotch. When he did a tour of duty in Australia his son attended a school called Scotch College. Does that mean the Scottish adjective is just a fashion?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-08-2009, 08:06 PM
lac2003 lac2003 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 34
Default

Not according to him, he's not! Of course, this is a man who wanted to have a circle of Scottish soil surrounding the bed when I gave birth to our son in Germany!
The worst is when we're in the states and people ask him about being English or Irish!!
If Prince Harry had married Chelsey Davies, would he have been the first senior member of the royal family to marry a Zimbabwean?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-08-2009, 12:16 AM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Ella Kay Ella Kay is offline
Courtier
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lac2003 View Post
If Prince Harry had married Chelsey Davies, would he have been the first senior member of the royal family to marry a Zimbabwean?
I would imagine so. In fact, I can't recall any senior British royal ever marrying an African, though I could be wrong.
__________________
"I have to be seen to be believed."
HM The Queen

Royal Romance
Mad Hattery!
The Daily Kate
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-07-2009, 11:45 PM
Vasillisos Markos Vasillisos Markos is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 83
Default

Nationalism is alive and well! What if Scotland, which I believe has its own Parliament, breaks away from the United Kingdom and needs its own ruler-- maybe it can be Prince Andrew once the Queen dies and then the throne will pass down through his line.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-12-2009, 12:37 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos View Post
Nationalism is alive and well! What if Scotland, which I believe has its own Parliament, breaks away from the United Kingdom and needs its own ruler-- maybe it can be Prince Andrew once the Queen dies and then the throne will pass down through his line.
I really can't see Scotland accepting Andrew as their King, even though he is the Earl of Inverness, I can count on one hand the amount of times he has traveled up to the capitol of the Highlands. He has no private home in Scotland and seems to show no interest in the Scots, unlike his brother Charles, who is well thought of, even by the SNP leader Salmond, by all accounts.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-13-2009, 12:20 PM
Vasillisos Markos Vasillisos Markos is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 83
Default



I did not realize Prince Andrew was not fond of Scotland. I thought the entire Royal Family enjoyed their summer vacations in Balmoral. Some day I hope to visit Scotland.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-13-2009, 03:28 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Mermaid1962 Mermaid1962 is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 2,212
Default

There is Scotland's association with golf.

I'd like to visit Scotland someday as well. I expect that there are any number of people there who look like me, because I'd have many, many distant relatives there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos View Post


I did not realize Prince Andrew was not fond of Scotland. I thought the entire Royal Family enjoyed their summer vacations in Balmoral. Some day I hope to visit Scotland.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-16-2009, 03:20 PM
scooter's Avatar
scooter scooter is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos View Post


I did not realize Prince Andrew was not fond of Scotland. I thought the entire Royal Family enjoyed their summer vacations in Balmoral. Some day I hope to visit Scotland.
With the availablity of Balmoral, plus the family 'required' holiday there, I can see why Andrew wouldn't find it necessary to purchase a house of his own in Scotland.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-16-2009, 03:37 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,954
Default


I don't think there is a requirement to holiday at Balmoral, nor do I think Andrew has been there in a while!

If anyone other than Charles, I think the Scots would support Anne, who demonstrates her support for Scotland on a regular basis!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-16-2009, 03:39 PM
lumutqueen's Avatar
lumutqueen lumutqueen is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
With the availablity of Balmoral, plus the family 'required' holiday there, I can see why Andrew wouldn't find it necessary to purchase a house of his own in Scotland.
I don't think the family holliday is required. Not many members of the royal family choose to go up their for summer. I agree that andrew doesn't like scotland, probably too rural.
__________________
The power of imagination makes us INFINTE :)
To dare is to loose oneself for but a moment, not to dare is to loose oneself FOREVER - Prince Frederik to Princess Mary.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-08-2009, 02:03 AM
wbenson's Avatar
wbenson wbenson is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 792
Default

There have only been Zimbabweans since 1980, so there haven't been very many royals that could have married a Zimbabwean.
__________________
TRF rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
commoners, james ii, lady anne hyde, lady diana spencer


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
British Royal First and Second-Cousin Marriages KathyMoore British Royal History 62 Yesterday 02:49 AM
The Royal Marriages Act of 1772 branchg British Royals 39 04-17-2009 04:25 PM
Images of English/British Queen Consorts mknyazev British Royal History 29 03-15-2009 05:02 PM
Shortest Royal Marriages HMTLove23 Royal Weddings General Discussion 4 02-16-2008 07:41 AM
European/Japan royal marriages Australian Imperial Family of Japan 32 05-14-2006 01:37 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0