The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:45 PM
tiaraprin's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,839
The Protestant Religions and Protestant Royals

As we are all learning about Roman Catholicism in the Catholic thread, I saw that some people were confused about which religions were Protestant religions. I felt perhaps there can be a forum of learning and discussing the many Protestant religions that exist today and the Royals who practice them. I would like a forum that is meant for a true exchange of knowledge; not one of a prejudical attack.

The USA, my native land, is more than 50% percent Protestant. Some of the Protestant religions in my country are: Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Anabaptist, Episcopalian, and Born Again Christianity. This is just a short list, there are many more.

Anyone who has questions about any Protestant faiths or have any news relating to religious issues with Protestant Royals, here is a place to ask and share.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:55 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Good idea Tiarapin. I have always been intreseted in the State Churches of Protestent countrys. Is the King of Sweden still the head of the swedish church. Is presbytarian still practiced widley and scotland and how is its role in scotland compare to the anglican church in england.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2005, 07:44 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: toronto, Canada
Posts: 258
a swedish friend of mine told me that as lutheranism is the state religion of sweden everyone who is born there is counted as lutheran at birth except if you specifically indicate that you are not by sending in the proper documentation to the government.Could someone tell me if this is correct.Does this mean that as the state religion the king can not change his faith?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2007, 09:33 AM
Sylvina's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vxj, Sweden
Posts: 15
These days the goverment and the church of sweden is split apart, but i still belive that the king can not change his faith.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:03 AM
norwegianne's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 5,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvina View Post
These days the goverment and the church of sweden is split apart, but i still belive that the king can not change his faith.
I remember reading something from when the church/state split was a reality in Sweden, that the King himself did not want to change that part of the law. He wanted the monarch and the Swedish church to be tied together.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2008, 04:10 AM
Iain's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejohnny25 View Post
Is presbytarian still practiced widley and scotland and how is its role in scotland compare to the anglican church in england.
In Scotland the Church of Scotland (or Kirk as it's usually called) is not the "State Church" but is termed the "National Church." It plays a far bigger role in national life than the Anglican Church does in England but many in Scotland get rather annoyed with it as it fails to speak out on moral issues and there has been a lot of criticism of it in the press because of this. One journalist said that it had lost it's right to be called the National Church and called for that title to pass to the Catholic Church, which has for the past 30 years or so been the largest religion in Scotland, and it is to that Church that the media always turn when it wants comments on various moral issues. The Church of Scotland is now just a shadow of it’s former self. As one newspaper put it “Ask any Scot who the Cardinal is and everyone knows his name, but ask who the Moderator of the Kirk is and you would be lucky if one in thousand could name him.”
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-17-2008, 11:52 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 14,822
The Dutch RF (most of them) are members of the PKN, Protestant Churches Netherlands. The PKN has 3 main branches united, lutherans (smallest one), reformed and the Dutch reformed. The RF traditionally is Dutch reformed, which is based on Calvinism. Note that it took 50 years or so to unite the protestant branches in The Netherlands and that the most orthopdox protestants immidiately split up and started the 'Hersteld gereformeerden', the 'restaured reformed'.

I am not sure but I believe the Prussian RF is also traditionally Calvinist instead of Lutheran (more common in Germany).
__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:49 PM
BryanCornett's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Petersburg, United States
Posts: 155
i believe the canute family of the country Denmark when they were no longer royalty moved to france and became huguenots along with john calvin. and i also believe that John calvin protected the canute family that's how i'm here today. and i believe the Danish Monarchy knows something about this. see in order for the canute family to carry King Canute The Great's personal coat of arms they would have to prove their lineage plus have permission from the Danish Monarchy to carry the Canute Coat of the Arms from Country to country and now the Canute coat of arms is in the hands of the cornett family of the USA and that's how us Canute's still survive today.
__________________
Here is three more links that prove the Canute/Cornett Connection.

http://deltaboogie.com/deltamusicians/hawkinsr/
Read the story before the hawk flew by part IV
http://www.surnameweb.org/cornett/surname-origin.htm

http://boards.ancestry.com/surnames....41.989/mb.ashx

here is another link http://genforum.genealogy.com/cgi-bi...nett::659.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:28 PM
Next Star's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 873
The Norway royals are protestant I think their Lutheran or maybe Angelican I'm
just guessing I don't know really.If I am wrong I hope someone will correct me.
__________________
Patience is a virtue.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-14-2008, 05:23 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 14,822
I think all the Scandinavian monarchies are Lutheran.

The house of Luxembourg (Nassau) used to be protestant until GD Guillaume IV married a Portuguese infanta. The deal was that their sons would be raised as protestants and their daughters as catholics. The couple only got daughters so after thta the GD house was catholic.
__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-23-2008, 06:14 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, United States
Posts: 2,324
This is an Interesting topic thanks for posting it
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2008, 07:26 PM
Viv's Avatar
Viv Viv is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Funen, Denmark
Posts: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo View Post
I think all the Scandinavian monarchies are Lutheran.
They are indeed!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-21-2010, 12:58 PM
Smart's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiaraprin View Post
As we are all learning about Roman Catholicism in the Catholic thread, I saw that some people were confused about which religions were Protestant religions. I felt perhaps there can be a forum of learning and discussing the many Protestant religions that exist today and the Royals who practice them. I would like a forum that is meant for a true exchange of knowledge; not one of a prejudical attack.

The USA, my native land, is more than 50% percent Protestant. Some of the Protestant religions in my country are: Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Anabaptist, Episcopalian, and Born Again Christianity. This is just a short list, there are many more.

Anyone who has questions about any Protestant faiths or have any news relating to religious issues with Protestant Royals, here is a place to ask and share.
Number of problems with this one. In particular, the idea that there are Protestant "religions" and "faiths". The word denomination is used, to denote a community within the Protestant sub-religion of Christianity.

"Protestant" has historically meant "not of Rome or the East" (ie, not Roman Catholic, Eastern or Oriental Orthodox). Thus Anglicanism/Episcopalianism qualifies under this very broad definition.

However, since at least the 1800s, Anglicanism has been very distinct from Protestantism. So has Pentecostalism.

As such, my definition of Protestant: anyone who follows the Reformers post-Luther. (Calvin, Knox, etc)

Thus:
Christianity:
sub-religions: Protestantism - Catholicism - Eastern Orthodox - Oriental Orthodox - Neo-Christianity (cults/sects of the last 200 years)

Protestantism:
All Trinitarian churches that adhere to Calvinistic or Arminian doctrine, such as Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, etc.

Catholicism:
Roman/Eastern - Anglican - Lutheran - Traditional - Old

Eastern Orthodox:
all regional churches that accept Ancient Patriarchates' rulings/teachings.

Oriental Orthodox:
Ethiopian/Eritrean - Coptic - Armenian - others

Neo-Christianity (those originating after 1800, without alignment with prior movements):
Jehovahs Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Christian Science, Pentecostalism/Charismatic, amongst others.

Note - Mormonism excluded, as that is a separate religion from Christianity, despite modern Mormon laymen trying to connect it to Protestantism.
__________________
Supporter of global Republicanism and the Abolition of all Monarchies. With special attention to the Windsors.
Quote:
There! His Majesty can now read my name without glasses. And he can double the reward on my head!
-John Hancock, upon signing the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-21-2010, 05:42 PM
Maura724's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis, United States
Posts: 772
I'm not sure how Luther and Lutheranism can not be considered as Protestant. I would define Protestant as groups which sprang from the Reformation, in protest to the Catholic church and its doctrine. The beginning of the Reformation (although there were certainly "reformers" before this, e.g. Wycliffe) is often dated to 1517, beginning with Martin Luther in Germany. IMO, it's hard not to call that Protestant. The central doctrines that set Protestantism apart in the Reformation era were a rejection of transubstantiation and a rejection of good works having any role in salvation. Lutheranism fits both these.

I agree with the description of Baptists/Presbyterians/Methodists etc. as Protestants, but why do you hang the definition on Calvinism and Arminianism, especially since those are exactly opposite doctrines?

And I'm curious why you exclude Mormonism from Christianity if you include Jehovah's Witnesses and Christian Science?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-25-2010, 12:41 AM
Smart's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maura724 View Post
I'm not sure how Luther and Lutheranism can not be considered as Protestant. I would define Protestant as groups which sprang from the Reformation, in protest to the Catholic church and its doctrine. The beginning of the Reformation (although there were certainly "reformers" before this, e.g. Wycliffe) is often dated to 1517, beginning with Martin Luther in Germany. IMO, it's hard not to call that Protestant. The central doctrines that set Protestantism apart in the Reformation era were a rejection of transubstantiation and a rejection of good works having any role in salvation. Lutheranism fits both these.

I agree with the description of Baptists/Presbyterians/Methodists etc. as Protestants, but why do you hang the definition on Calvinism and Arminianism, especially since those are exactly opposite doctrines?

And I'm curious why you exclude Mormonism from Christianity if you include Jehovah's Witnesses and Christian Science?
Martin Luther died a Catholic. As he put up the 99 theses he was a Catholic. This is an irrefutable fact. He never took the title "Protestant". And all forms of Lutheranism since him and now reflect a strong connection to Roman Catholicism - something Baptists or other Protestant groups completely lack. Lutheranism is a Catholic faith. All Lutherans are Catholics. The difference between them and a Papist is the side of the Tiber River they are on.

Luther never broke from Rome, he condemned the actions of the Papacy at the time. The reason why many Historians (not Theologians) place the Reformation as beginning at 1517 is because this is the first time, ANYONE stood up (in public, unashamed) against the Roman Catholic faith and authority. This was the catalyst which later men - who were Protestant and anti-Catholic (like Calvin, Knox, Wesley, etc) built upon.

Well, I personally would place all non-Calvinists in a completely separate religion, even farther than Rome. But this is not a matter of what is Biblical and what is not - but rather the categorization in modern times.

As Mormonism is Polytheistic (literally an infinite number of gods and universes) it can not be considered part of Christianity, or even a Christianized religion - as it fundamentally denies all tenants of Christianity. (the virgin birth, the incarnation, the sacrifice at Calvary, the Resurrection, etc). This is not the case in Jehovahs Witnesses or Christian Science. Jehovahs Witnesses are Neo-Christian (do not agree with accepted Orthodoxy of 400-1800AD) as it denies the Trinity - albeit affirming some sort of divine status for Jesus (like Arius did). As for Christian Science, it's clearly a cult, but the modern concept of Young-Earth Creationism originated in Christian Science. So it's hard, at least in the case of American Christianity, to separate the Christian Science movement from Christianity.
__________________
Supporter of global Republicanism and the Abolition of all Monarchies. With special attention to the Windsors.
Quote:
There! His Majesty can now read my name without glasses. And he can double the reward on my head!
-John Hancock, upon signing the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-07-2011, 06:56 AM
irishthanhy's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus, United States
Posts: 49
Lutherans aren't Catholic.
__________________
All opinions expressed above are mine & may be wrong.
-Le Phuong Thanh

http://hipsterroyals.tumblr.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-07-2011, 09:22 AM
Maura724's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis, United States
Posts: 772
I very much agree with you, irishthanhy. Regardless of what Martin Luther called himself, the beliefs he held and spread among others, and the beliefs Lutherans hold today, are not the same as the beliefs of the Catholic Church in certain very significant areas. Lutherans are closer to Catholics than, say, Presbyterians are, but they are not Catholic. A rejection of transubstantiation and the mass, and an emphasis on sola fide sola gratia are the crucial doctrines that mark a church or a person as Protestant rather than Catholic. Lutheranism rejects the mass, and its doctrine of consubstantiation is quite different from transubstantiation. And although it places a higher value on baptism than other Protestant denominations, Lutheranism emphasizes a salvation by grace through faith.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
abdication belgium brussels carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events fashion germany grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king carl xvi gustav king constantine ii king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympic games ottoman pieter van vollenhoven poland pregnancy president hollande prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince daniel prince floris prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess ariane princess astrid princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary queen anne-marie queen fabiola queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]