The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 10-07-2015, 01:25 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,582
Who Is Considered Royal?

A reigning monarch and his/her consort, or a former monarch upon abdication and his/her consort, are obviously royal by default. In addition however to the king and queen, or the queen and the prince consort, who else can be considered royal ?

Depending on the definition one adopts, the class of "royals" may include:

1) All persons in the line of succession to a throne and their respective consorts, who, in the UK for example, would mean hundreds of people.

2) All persons in the line of succession to a throne who also hold the title of prince/princess or equivalent (e.g. infante/infanta or archduke/archduchess) and their respective consorts unless untitled (as is the case of many male consorts of royal princesses).

3) All persons holding the style of HRH, who are not necessarily the same group as in (2) above as some princes/princesses are only HHs and there are also sometimes HRHs who are not in the line of succession.

4) All persons who are official members of a Royal House, who again do not necessarily coincide with the group in (3) above as sometimes an HRH may not be a Royal House member (e.g. Felipe VI's sisters).

Personally, I tend to prefer definition # 2, meaning that, to me, Prince Constantijn, Princess Märtha-Louise, Infanta Elena and Princess Anne for example would all be considered "royals", but their respective children and, in the case of Anne or Märtha-Louise, also their husbands would not. On the other hand, both Prince Joachim, Princess Marie and Prince Joachim's children (HHs) would all be royals.

The most controversial issue with definition # 2 is, however, that HRHs or HHs outside the line of succession would not be considered royals, e.g. Irene and Christina of the Netherlands, or Birgitta of Sweden, or Princess Margriet's children. Amedeo of Belgium, on the other hand, although no longer in the line of succession to the Belgian throne, could still be considered royal as an archduke of Austria-Este in the line of succession to the extinct Austro-Hungarian throne.


Anyway, to eliminate the controversy, one could come up with an alternative definition 2.1 where all HRHs and HHs are automatically "royal" regardless of succession rights. Being on the line of succession would still be required though for a royal as defined in 2.1 to be also considered a "dynast".

What do you guys think ?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2015, 02:14 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,047
Who is considered a "royal" ?

Doesn't each country define for itself who is Royal? The website for the British monarchy as an example has a section on the royal family and who is considers as the royal family.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2015, 02:24 PM
Jacknch's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk/Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,742
Isn't it the case is some countries that there is a definition between the Royal House and the Royal Family, such as in the Netherlands? Either way you are still royal or of royal blood.
There is a similar situation in Spain.

It's an interesting question because here in the UK it is generally considered that Zara and Peter Philips are members of the royal family, but it seems ambiguous as to whether they are royal or not - if that makes sense.
__________________
JACK
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2015, 02:29 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 7,012
Well, we can say that Don Felipe de Marichalar y Borbón and his sister Doña Victoria belong to the royal family of Spain, as children of an Infanta, grandchildren of the former King and nephew/niece to the present King. They however have no royal status.

We can say that Bernardo, Nicolás and Juliana Guillermo belong to the royal family of the Netherlands, as children of a Princess, grandchildren to a former Queen, newphew/niece to another former Queen and cousins to the present King. They however have no royal status.

So, the conclusion is: being of royal descent is not enough to be "royal".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-08-2015, 01:28 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: brisbane, Australia
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacknch View Post
Isn't it the case is some countries that there is a definition between the Royal House and the Royal Family, such as in the Netherlands? Either way you are still royal or of royal blood.
There is a similar situation in Spain.

It's an interesting question because here in the UK it is generally considered that Zara and Peter Philips are members of the royal family, but it seems ambiguous as to whether they are royal or not - if that makes sense.
Well I wouldn't consider Zara and Pete as Royal. They have no title to start with and the British Monarchy has never recognised decent through the female line except through a Reigning Monarch. A perfect example was that of the future Queen Mary. She was a Morganatic Royal through her descent from her father, the Duke of Teck, not through her mother who was born a Princess.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2015, 01:45 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacknch View Post
Isn't it the case is some countries that there is a definition between the Royal House and the Royal Family, such as in the Netherlands? Either way you are still royal or of royal blood.
There is a similar situation in Spain.

It's an interesting question because here in the UK it is generally considered that Zara and Peter Philips are members of the royal family, but it seems ambiguous as to whether they are royal or not - if that makes sense.
I will take Princess Margaret's and Princess Anne's view on whether or not they are royal - they aren't.

Margaret first said and then Anne repeated it changing one word:

"My children aren't royal - they just have The Queen for an 'aunt'/'grandmother'."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2015, 01:54 AM
eya eya is online now
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 8,726
What difference with Sweden that children Madeleine is royal. However I agree with someone who said that it is another to being royal descent and another being a royal.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-08-2015, 02:23 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 7,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by eya View Post
What difference with Sweden that children Madeleine is royal. However I agree with someone who said that it is another to being royal descent and another being a royal.
The difference is that her children are created Prince (Princess) of Sweden and that makes that they are royal, while in essence there is no difference between the children of Infanta Elena and the children of Princess Madeleine, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2015, 02:33 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,625
Perhaps King Carl Gustav hoped that his son in law Chris O'Neill would change his mind about accepting a title for himself such as a Dukedom when his children with Princess Madeline were born? When it became clear that Chris was not interested the King moved to make sure his grandchildren were a Prince and Princess. It certainly seems a bit odd to have royals who possess an untitled father.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-08-2015, 03:05 AM
Jacknch's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk/Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 5,742
So there is no clear cut answer to the original question because it is dependent upon the rules of each country/family then. It isn't necessarily the title you have or having royal parentage or marrying a royal that makes you royal. And being a member of a royal family doesn't make you royal either.
__________________

__________________
JACK
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are Ex-Kings Still Considered "Former Head of State"? roimat Royalty Past, Present, and Future 29 10-07-2009 02:24 PM
At what point is making a negative comment considered bashing? Is there a difference sommone Forum Announcements and Admin 6 08-20-2004 04:00 AM




Popular Tags
best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark duchess of cambridge eveningwear fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín james bond jewels king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news noice november 2016 october 2016 picture of the week prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harken in canada prince nicholas prince oscar prince sebastian princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess mary hats princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia suits queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen silvia rohan family state visit state visit from argentina stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises