 |
|

04-30-2006, 01:31 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 176
|
|
Infanta Cristina and iñaki visiting the Pope

from corbis
|

05-02-2006, 03:29 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: moved to, Spain
Posts: 762
|
|
|

05-21-2006, 05:31 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator Picture of the Month Representative - Norway & Spain Royal Blogger
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bochum, Germany
Posts: 8,482
|
|
Queen Margrethe II visiting Pope Benedikt XVI in Rome (may 2006)
from http://danishroyalwatchers.blogspot.com/ ( you can find some more there)
__________________
|

05-22-2006, 07:46 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 662
|
|
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/5236/drws18lz.jpg
Why is Queen Margrethe no wearing black as protocol dicktates
__________________
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 59 Years of Dedicated and Devoted Service
God Save The Queen!
|

05-22-2006, 08:59 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seremban, Malaysia
Posts: 304
|
|
|
A Catholic Head of State or Head of Government need to wear white whereas a non-Catholic Head of State or Head of Government need to wear black when visiting the Pope at the Vatican.This rule does not apply when the Pope visits a Head of State or Head of Government at his or her country.
|

05-24-2006, 05:56 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 662
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by srivishnu
A Catholic Head of State or Head of Government need to wear white whereas a non-Catholic Head of State or Head of Government need to wear black when visiting the Pope at the Vatican.This rule does not apply when the Pope visits a Head of State or Head of Government at his or her country.
|
I understand that bit but Queen Margrethe II is in the Vatican and not wearing black. Does anyone understand why.
__________________
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 59 Years of Dedicated and Devoted Service
God Save The Queen!
|

05-24-2006, 11:13 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,465
|
|
|
Good question...even QEII wore black when meeting Pope John Paul II with a tiara and veil attached to it, I believe..
There has to be some loophole to this as I cannot imagine MII breaching protocol on purpose.
|

05-24-2006, 02:04 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 833
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyalProtocol
|
When Queen Margrethe became queen in 1972 she and PrinceConsort Henrik was in a audience/stats wisit with the Pope.
They both was in black and Queen Margrethe was wearing a tiara,so she has not brocke the protocol...sadly i can´t finde any pic. of her and the Pope...not even on polfoto.dk :(
__________________
Long live the royal family in Denmark
|

05-25-2006, 05:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 662
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by H.M. Margrethe
When Queen Margrethe became queen in 1972 she and PrinceConsort Henrik was in a audience/stats wisit with the Pope.
They both was in black and Queen Margrethe was wearing a tiara,so she has not brocke the protocol...sadly i can´t finde any pic. of her and the Pope...not even on polfoto.dk :(
|
Whenever Elizabeth II visited the 1st time she wore veil, tiara etc. The second time there was a new Pope so she repeated the formal dress code, the third time however it was still JPII and she still wore black lace, eventhough it was just a suite and hat. So does that not point to the fact that perhaps Margrethe II should still have worn black?
__________________
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 59 Years of Dedicated and Devoted Service
God Save The Queen!
|

05-27-2006, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 833
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyalProtocol
Whenever Elizabeth II visited the 1st time she wore veil, tiara etc. The second time there was a new Pope so she repeated the formal dress code, the third time however it was still JPII and she still wore black lace, eventhough it was just a suite and hat. So does that not point to the fact that perhaps Margrethe II should still have worn black?
|
I don´t think so but you also have to know that thes 2 queens are from 2 diffrent kinde of generation and they migth have 2 diffrent opinions about what to wear.
__________________
Long live the royal family in Denmark
|

05-27-2006, 08:12 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: paris, France
Posts: 2,101
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lyle
Wow, Letizia looked so beautiful during that visit!
|
You are totaly right, one proof more :
( from cover )
|

05-27-2006, 10:52 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 422
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by H.M. Margrethe
I don´t think so but you also have to know that thes 2 queens are from 2 diffrent kinde of generation and they migth have 2 diffrent opinions about what to wear.
|
When it comes to the conventions and dress protocol associated with the Vatican (which is quite strict and rather clear), it falls without the monarch's discretion to decide which colour they wear. The personalities of the monarchs are irrelevant when adhering to established procedure.
[Edit: refer to post #21].
__________________
Thy choicest gifts in store, on her be pleased to pour, long may she reign. May she defend our laws, and ever give us cause, to sing with heart and voice, GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.
|

05-29-2006, 09:38 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 662
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Von Schlesian
When it comes to the conventions and dress protocol associated with the Vatican (which is quite strict and rather clear), it falls without the monarch's discretion to decide which colour they wear. The personalities of the monarchs are irrelevant when adhering to established procedure.
[Edit: refer to post #21].
|
I quite agree, when Protocol makes clear what one should wear then you should stick to it, its like turning up to a white tie gala dinner in your jeans.
Wear black to meet the Pope in the Vatican if your not a Catholic Queen or the Grand Duchess of Luxemburg!!
__________________
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 59 Years of Dedicated and Devoted Service
God Save The Queen!
|

06-12-2006, 08:45 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,646
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jelka
No, they should only wear white if he/she is king/queen, and since Letitia is Crownprinsess, but not yet a queen, she has to wear black.
|
only female catholic monarchs and female consorts are allowed to wear white when meeting the Holy Father:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_privilege_(royalty)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kittencrews
Why did Rainier,Caroline, and Albert wear black they are Catholic?
|
while they are catholic, caroline is not a reigning monarch or a consort and the men must still wear black.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by A.C.C.
The princesses of Monaco are not given le privelege du blanc, which is the right to wear white to the Vatican. The only women who can wear white to the Vatican are the Queens of Spain and Belgium, the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg, the Princesses of Savioa, and the Archduchesses of Habsburg. All other royal women, Catholic or not must wear black to the Vatican.
|
this almost correct - all female reigning monarchs or female consorts are permitted to wear white when meeting the Pope as long as they're catholic. at present, these are the only women who fit that criteria. if there are women from other countries, then they too would be allowed to wear white.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by A.C.C.
Actually, when Princess Grace of Monaco visited the Vatican, she always wore black, and i believe thats for the Liechtenstein princesses as well.
|
since Princess Grace was not a Queen or a consort she would not be permitted to wear white to the Vatican.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyalProtocol
I understand that bit but Queen Margrethe II is in the Vatican and not wearing black. Does anyone understand why.
|
although there is protocol with regards to dress colour, many people no longer practice it. i think it means more to a catholic than someone from another religion.
__________________
Duchess
|

06-13-2006, 11:54 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,465
|
|
|
Umm...Princess Grace was a consort to a ruling monarch..
I also seem to remember Marina Doria wearing white to visit the Pope..
|

06-13-2006, 03:18 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: paris, France
Posts: 2,101
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade
Umm...Princess Grace was a consort to a ruling monarch..
I also seem to remember Marina Doria wearing white to visit the Pope..
|
Yes, I saw it too and I'm not sure according the rules that Marina Doria was right to do it because she is not a queen reigning. More as her husband had signed that he is giving up at his royal prerogatives on the italian crown to go into Italy, she never will be catholic queen.
I don't know how we have to interprate this way of doing !
|

06-13-2006, 07:28 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,646
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade
Umm...Princess Grace was a consort to a ruling monarch..
I also seem to remember Marina Doria wearing white to visit the Pope..
|
according to the dictionary a monarch is a sovereign such as a king or empress. Prince Ranier was a ruling prince but he wasn't a ruling monarch so that means that Grace wasn't eligible to wear white when meeting the Pope.
as for this other lady, marina doria, wearing white - well if she isn't a reigning catholic monarch then she broke protocol.
__________________
Duchess
|

06-13-2006, 07:51 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,646
|
|
|
with regards to the black/white issue...as with many old traditions in the catholic church dressing in black/white when meeting the Holy Father is becoming less common. the white/black issue probably means more to a roman catholic (and a traditional roman catholic at that) than it does to people from other faiths. while it is protocol and does show respect for his postion, i don't think the Holy Father would hold it against anyone if they chose to wear white or any other colour.
__________________
Duchess
|

06-15-2006, 11:31 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 304
|
|
Quote:
|
Prince Ranier was a ruling prince but he wasn't a ruling monarch
|
Rainier was a monarch. A monarch doesn't just have to be a king or queen, If a country is ruled by a prince, a grand duke, a sultan or a sheik then that person is the monarch.
|

06-15-2006, 06:49 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,646
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iain
Rainier was a monarch. A monarch doesn't just have to be a king or queen, If a country is ruled by a prince, a grand duke, a sultan or a sheik then that person is the monarch.
|
here is the White Privilege according to Wikipedia:
The White Privilege, or Privilege du blanc, is a privilege held by female Catholic Monarchs whether a consort or a regnant, wherein they are allowed to wear white when in an audience with the Pope.
my aplologies about the ranier error.
so to round out the discussion - only a catholic queen or consort or regnant is permitted to wear white...not a princess. the reason princess grace did not wear white is because she is not a queen or a consort or a regnant.
__________________
Duchess
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|