The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #121  
Old 07-16-2016, 02:30 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: philadelphia, United States
Posts: 1,397
One question:

An example of marriage between Prince Ioann of Russia and Princess Helen of Serbia.

Who would take precedence in Russian court?

All princes and princesses of Imperial blood were His/Her Highness,while in this example a wife of a Highness is Royal Highness.

Would she outrank her husband and all princes and princesses of imperial blood?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 07-16-2016, 03:34 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,953
I would suspect that in the Russian court she would have taken her precedence from her husband, not her father. She may have taken a higher precedence when in Serbia or when traveling to other countries without her husband.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 07-16-2016, 03:34 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,187
You must not look to the form of address (Your Highness, Your Excellency, Your Eminence, Your Honour, etc.). You must look to the position one has. A president and an ambassador have the same form of address (His Excellency) but a president always outranks an ambassador.

As female spouses take the title and corresponding rank of their husbands you need to know the consanguinity to the Sovereign (is the husband a son, a grandson, an uncle, a cousin to the Sovereign?). The closer the consanguinity, the higher in the pecking order. Etc. A royal can also have precedence because he holds a prestigious Order like Golden Fleece or the Garter. He can have anciennity, he can have a high rank (the Duke of Kent is Field Marshal of the British Army and outranks almost all at military events. It is a fine web, more than just HSH or HH, which are often wrong British interpretations of the German system.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 07-16-2016, 03:51 PM
duke of poliganc's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: cairo, Egypt
Posts: 611
she would retain her title and precedence as a royal highness the same as grand duchess maria alexandrovna of russia retained and was a accordance with the precedence of imperial highness and royal highness she outranked all the princesses in the british court except the princess of wales
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 07-16-2016, 04:17 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,953
Maria Alexandrovna was the wife of the second son of the Queen. That's why she outranked all the other princesses in the British court, except the Princess of Wales (the wife of the first son).

The British order of precedence for women is:
1. The Sovereign (regardless of gender)
2. The Queen (if not the sovereign)
3. The Dowager Queens
4. The wife of the sovereign's eldest son
5. The wives of the sovereign's younger sons (in order of the sons' birth)
6. The daughters of the sovereign (in order of birth)
7. The wives of the sovereign's grandsons (in the order of the grandson's precedences)
8. The granddaughters of the sovereign (in the order of primogeniture)
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 07-16-2016, 04:41 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,913
Precisely. She did though retain her own rank, she was Her imperial and royal highness, but her rank as third lady behind Victoria and Alexandra was due to her husband.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 08-18-2016, 03:11 PM
HRHPrinceD.J.H.W.G's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Windsor, United Kingdom
Posts: 19
Monarchs are more powerful. Especially the British Monarch. The Queen holds the power passed on the her Ministers of the Crown. However the Armed Forces and the British people are loyal to her not the government of the day. In other countries, a President will not have the same affection from his people or the military. The Queen technically can declare war on her own, the US President cannot. Furthermore politicians come and go, a Monarch has continuous loyalty and affection by his/her people. The death of a British Monarch would cause more global grief than the death of a former US President I'm sure, although of course there would still be much grieving for a US President and rightly so.
__________________
HRH Prince Daniel James Henry William George of the United Kingdom. Heir Presumptive.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 08-19-2016, 11:30 AM
Suzzanah's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hallsville, United States
Posts: 35
This is not exactly correct. Equality in leadership of countries is tough. Some are democracy, autocracy,oligarchy and so on. Additionally anyone knighted has a rank below HRH.
__________________
Suzzanah
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 08-19-2016, 12:58 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHPrinceD.J.H.W.G View Post
Monarchs are more powerful. Especially the British Monarch. The Queen holds the power passed on the her Ministers of the Crown. However the Armed Forces and the British people are loyal to her not the government of the day. In other countries, a President will not have the same affection from his people or the military. The Queen technically can declare war on her own, the US President cannot. Furthermore politicians come and go, a Monarch has continuous loyalty and affection by his/her people. The death of a British Monarch would cause more global grief than the death of a former US President I'm sure, although of course there would still be much grieving for a US President and rightly so.
Can QEII order the destruction of the entire planet in a matter of minutes with the push of a set of nuclear codes? The American president can.

And nope, he does not need the consent of Congress to do so.

The British monarch will almost always command prestige, affection and respect but to claim that any monarch, British or otherwise, is more powerful than the elected President of the United States is folly imo.

The sudden sad and unexpected passing of King George VI caused much global mourning, but I don't think it caused more grief than the sudden death of Franklin Roosevelt did in the spring of 1945, or the truly shocking murder of JFK in 1963 that sent the entire civilized world into shock and grief for months.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 08-19-2016, 02:43 PM
moby's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHPrinceD.J.H.W.G View Post
Monarchs are more powerful. Especially the British Monarch. The Queen holds the power passed on the her Ministers of the Crown. However the Armed Forces and the British people are loyal to her not the government of the day. In other countries, a President will not have the same affection from his people or the military. The Queen technically can declare war on her own, the US President cannot. Furthermore politicians come and go, a Monarch has continuous loyalty and affection by his/her people. The death of a British Monarch would cause more global grief than the death of a former US President I'm sure, although of course there would still be much grieving for a US President and rightly so.
Er no, saying monarchs are more powerful than presidents, which has been repeatedly said in this thread makes no sense. Leaders' "power" or positions in protocolar discussions are based on the legitimacy of their countries and the mandate granted to them by their people, that's why they're ranked based on their length of rule. If you want to get a sense of which leader is more powerful, take a look at the UN. Technically, one country = one vote but then you have the UNSC Permanent Members which have veto powers. Of course there are other issues at play when you talk about power like gravitas from force of personality (QEII, King Juan Carlos, Vladimir Putin, Bill Clinton), but those have nothing to do protocol which, although complicated, for the most part would have clear rules.

On what Duc_et_Pair said about Ambassadors and Heads of State with the same title of "Your Excellency," I know that few people observe this but supposedly, if the President is in the same place as his Ambassador in the latter's host country, say if a President is there for a State Visit, you're not supposed to address the Ambassador as "Excellency," only "Ambassador" with the "Excellency" address reserved for the President. The Ambassador gets his Excellency title only because he is the highest ranking representative of his country in his host government, so if his President is there, then he it's not appropriate to address him as "Excellency".
__________________
It seems to me that origination is perhaps instinct, not intellect. -Joe Strummer

Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 09-06-2016, 05:03 PM
Suzzanah's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hallsville, United States
Posts: 35
This is truly a complicated matter indeed. It depends on the country you are in and if your president is a knight or decorated by the other country. In most places a royal in any country would be an honored guest in that country. The president would be the host and they would meet as equal diplomats. In some countries the president would treat guests from other countries as less than equal but still as diplomats from another country. A royal within their realm visiting, might out rank the president of the country but it is all within the same realm. a good example is provinces, islands and territories. a good rule of thumb is this.... honor anyone older than you and anyone female if you are male. acknowledge anyone else that is royal whether you bow or not. Speak when spoken to, and break the ice in conversation if necessary. When in doubt think of everyone like an old auntie and treat them accordingly.
__________________
Suzzanah
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 09-06-2016, 07:50 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 3,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
Can QEII order the destruction of the entire planet in a matter of minutes with the push of a set of nuclear codes? The American president can.

And nope, he does not need the consent of Congress to do so.

The British monarch will almost always command prestige, affection and respect but to claim that any monarch, British or otherwise, is more powerful than the elected President of the United States is folly imo.

The sudden sad and unexpected passing of King George VI caused much global mourning, but I don't think it caused more grief than the sudden death of Franklin Roosevelt did in the spring of 1945, or the truly shocking murder of JFK in 1963 that sent the entire civilized world into shock and grief for months.
Well, back in the early decades at least of Queen Victoria's reign, the British Empíre was still far more powerful and wealthier than the United States, so the British PM, if not the Queen herself, were conceivably more influential than the POTUS at that time.

Nowadays, I'd say the most powerful person in the world is probably Wladimir Putin as, although Russia is not particularly wealthy, he still can destroy the world without the same kinds of checks and balances that the POTUS has.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 08-17-2017, 09:15 AM
Feologild's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Agder, Norway
Posts: 23
Does an Emperor Rank Higher than a King?

Or am i wrong in saying that an Emperor is ranked over a king ?





I did look but i could not find this question asked.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 08-17-2017, 09:30 AM
Muhler's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 10,970
An emperor is a ruler of an empire, which may include several kingdoms. So an emperor is higher up the ranks.

Napoleon is a fine example. You may question how royal he really was, but he made himself emperor and since France de facto ruled more or less directly over quite a number of client states, some of which even had French/Corsican kings, Napoleon was by every definition an emperor.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 08-17-2017, 02:42 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,913
It doesn't really apply today as there is only one emperor and he rules only one country.......

But traditionally a king would rule but one kingdom. An emperor though ruled over a vaster area. In the case of emperors, there were commonly kings as well. They were a step below the emperor, owing their fealty and obedience to the emperor while governing their particular lands. Where the emperor owed loyalty and fealty to no one.

Besides Napoleon there is the obvious example of the Holy Roman Empire. The kingdoms of the empire had their own rulers but those answered to the emperor. The emperor had lesser titles, usually king of a kingdom or two as well.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 08-17-2017, 03:05 PM
maria-olivia's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 4,852
Your Imperial Highnesses are for Japan and the Habsbourg descendents. More ?
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 08-17-2017, 03:30 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by maria-olivia View Post
Your Imperial Highnesses are for Japan and the Habsbourg descendents. More ?
The Romanovs. Grand Duchess Maria uses the title HIH. Of course her right to do so is disputed.

The hapsburgs use a combined imperial and royal highness.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 08-17-2017, 03:32 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,187
He is not higher ranked. In a group of heads of state he will be ranked according the anciennity of his position. Compare it with the Grand-Duke of Luxembourg who will have precedence over Don Felipe, Willem-Alexander and his cousin Philippe because he is head of state for 17 years now.

When Prince Naruhito becomes Emperor next year, he will close the row after the new King of Thailand. The most senior position is for Queen Elizabeth, purely because she is the doyenne of all heads-of-state, republican and royal.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 03-20-2018, 04:45 AM
kbk kbk is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 296
An example (and a proof) that princesses by blood take precedence over those who are married into the Royal Family (if without their husbands) is a recently published Court Circular about the 2018 Commonwealth Day Observance Service:

12 March 2018
Buckingham Palace

The Queen this afternoon attended the Commonwealth Day Observance Service in Westminster Abbey and was received by the Dean of Westminster (the Very Reverend Dr. John Hall) and the Chairman of the Council of Commonwealth Societies (the Lord Howell of Guildford).

The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall, The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Prince Henry of Wales, The Duke of York, The Princess Royal, Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy, The Countess of Wessex and The Duchess of Gloucester were also present.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
antony armstrong-jones british royal family camilla charles chris o'neill crown princess victoria current events current events thread duchess of brabant duchess of cambridge cocktail dresses duchessofsussex dutch royal family family fashion felipe vi general news helena hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hereditary prince alois infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia ińaki urdangarín king carl gustaf king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle news opening of parliament pablo urdangarín porphyria prince charles prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince jean prince nicholas prince oscar prince sebastian princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess of belgium princess victoria queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima hats royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding smith state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family tony armstrong-jones van belgië victoria video games wedding wedding of prince harry



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises